fix obviously_disjoint for Union Types (#49177)

JuliaLang · Mar 30, 2023 · 2092000 · 2092000
1 parent e5c2c51
commit 2092000
Show file tree

Hide file tree

Showing 2 changed files with 10 additions and 0 deletions.
diff --git a/src/subtype.c b/src/subtype.c
@@ -393,6 +393,12 @@ static int obviously_disjoint(jl_value_t *a, jl_value_t *b, int specificity)
  return 1;
  if (jl_is_unionall(a)) a = jl_unwrap_unionall(a);
  if (jl_is_unionall(b)) b = jl_unwrap_unionall(b);
+ if (jl_is_uniontype(a))
+ return obviously_disjoint(((jl_uniontype_t *)a)->a, b, specificity) &&
+ obviously_disjoint(((jl_uniontype_t *)a)->b, b, specificity);
+ if (jl_is_uniontype(b))
+ return obviously_disjoint(a, ((jl_uniontype_t *)b)->a, specificity) &&
+ obviously_disjoint(a, ((jl_uniontype_t *)b)->b, specificity);
  if (jl_is_datatype(a) && jl_is_datatype(b)) {
  jl_datatype_t *ad = (jl_datatype_t*)a, *bd = (jl_datatype_t*)b;
  if (ad->name != bd->name) {

diff --git a/test/subtype.jl b/test/subtype.jl
@@ -2474,3 +2474,7 @@ let a = [TypeVar(:V, Union{}, Function) for i in 1:32]
  T = foldr((v, d) -> UnionAll(v, d), b; init = foldl((i, j) -> F49127{i, j}, b))
  @test S <: T
 end
+
+# requires assertions enabled (to test union-split in `obviously_disjoint`)
+@test !<:(Tuple{Type{Int}, Int}, Tuple{Type{Union{Int, T}}, T} where T<:Union{Int8,Int16})
+@test <:(Tuple{Type{Int}, Int}, Tuple{Type{Union{Int, T}}, T} where T<:Union{Int8,Int})