Revert "add 'ᵀ postfix operator for transpose (#38062)" #40075
Merged
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This reverts commit 665279a.
simeonschaub
approved these changes
Mar 17, 2021
KristofferC
added a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Mar 23, 2021
KristofferC
added a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Mar 23, 2021
KristofferC
added a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Apr 4, 2021
ElOceanografo
pushed a commit
to ElOceanografo/julia
that referenced
this pull request
May 4, 2021
…iaLang#40075) This reverts commit 665279a.
antoine-levitt
pushed a commit
to antoine-levitt/julia
that referenced
this pull request
May 9, 2021
…iaLang#40075) This reverts commit 665279a.
staticfloat
pushed a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Dec 23, 2022
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
This reverts commit 665279a.
There has been some discussion about whether #38062 was such a good idea in hindsight (#40070, #38062 (comment)). It might make sense to go back on this feature to give us some more time to think about it, before locking it in into 1.6.
Fixes #40070