feat: support AMS log-like symbols #2429
Conversation
Codecov Report
@@ Coverage Diff @@
## master #2429 +/- ##
==========================================
+ Coverage 93.97% 94.01% +0.03%
==========================================
Files 84 84
Lines 5444 5476 +32
Branches 961 964 +3
==========================================
+ Hits 5116 5148 +32
Misses 297 297
Partials 31 31
Continue to review full report at Codecov.
|
ronkok
changed the title
|
Oh, I forgot to list the symbol names. They are: |
| defineMacro("\\injlim", "\\DOTSB\\operatorname*{int\\,lim}"); | ||
| defineMacro("\\projlim", "\\DOTSB\\operatorname*{proj\\,lim}"); | ||
| defineMacro("\\varlimsup", "\\DOTSB\\operatorname*{\\overline{lim}}"); | ||
| defineMacro("\\varliminf", "\\DOTSB\\operatorname*{\\underline{lim}}"); | ||
| defineMacro("\\varinjlim", "\\DOTSB\\operatorname*{\\underrightarrow{lim}}"); | ||
| defineMacro("\\varprojlim", "\\DOTSB\\operatorname*{\\underleftarrow{lim}}"); |
docs/supported.md
Outdated
|
|
||
| Functions on the right column of this table can take `\limits`. | ||
| Functions in the right column and bottom three rows of this table can take `\limits`. |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Can \argmax take limits as well?. Maybe an asterisk or something to indicate which items can take \limits would be easier to maintain.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
You know, I should review this table and that statement about the right hand column. I wrote that statement many revisions ago and I am no longer positive that it is still true. I'll spend some time with it tomorrow.
I once considered asterisks, but that would be confusing since asterisks are a part of some LaTeX functions, like \operatorname*. So far, I have not thought of any better way to convey the limits idea.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
I'll mark this PR as a draft for further changes.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
I have revised the Math Operators table in the documentation. This PR is once again ready for review.
This is super exciting. We still load MathJax as a fallback on khanacademy.org. I'll be nice to only load KaTeX. 🙂 |
ylemkimon
changed the title
This PR checks off six items in the effort to reach function parity with MathJax. That list is dwindling.
Here's a screenshot:
... which compares to the same code in quicklatex.com:
