Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Add stac opacity control #62

Merged
merged 3 commits into from
Jun 8, 2023
Merged

Add stac opacity control #62

merged 3 commits into from
Jun 8, 2023

Conversation

emmalu
Copy link
Collaborator

@emmalu emmalu commented Jun 6, 2023

Added an opacity slider associated with the STAC layer to address the 3rd item in these review notes brought up by @jjfrench.

Still need to update a corresponding image in the maap-documentation, if/when approved.

@wildintellect
Copy link
Collaborator

wildintellect commented Jun 6, 2023

@emmalu Can you drop the screenshot in the comments here?

@emmalu
Copy link
Collaborator Author

emmalu commented Jun 6, 2023

@emmalu Can you drop the screenshot in the comments here?

STAC Opacity Slider

cc @heidimok

@emmalu
Copy link
Collaborator Author

emmalu commented Jun 6, 2023

Quick demo video

Copy link
Collaborator

@wildintellect wildintellect left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

This might be a question for @jjfrench - now that 0.2.0 is released, do we need to bump the version or somehow otherwise indicate this is now the next version in progress?

@jjfrench
Copy link
Contributor

jjfrench commented Jun 7, 2023

Could bump the version, especially if you plan on including it in the UWG presentation. Otherwise do you do a beta version?

@emmalu emmalu merged commit 5de6f94 into main Jun 8, 2023
@wildintellect wildintellect deleted the add-stac-opacity-control branch September 27, 2023 22:12
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants