Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

[DOC] Improving clarity of docs and figures #419

Merged
merged 56 commits into from
Nov 8, 2019

Conversation

dowdlelt
Copy link
Collaborator

@dowdlelt dowdlelt commented Nov 6, 2019

Closes #83, .

Changes proposed in this pull request:

  • Adds live plots to the publications page
  • Publication page is renamed to reflect new focus on reporting average parameters
  • Reorganized main what is multiecho page
  • edited outputs to reflect .gz of nifti files
  • Adding details of output to approach page

@emdupre emdupre changed the title [DOC] Improving clarity of docs and figures [WIP, DOC] Improving clarity of docs and figures Nov 6, 2019
@codecov
Copy link

codecov bot commented Nov 6, 2019

Codecov Report

Merging #419 into master will not change coverage.
The diff coverage is n/a.

Impacted file tree graph

@@           Coverage Diff           @@
##           master     #419   +/-   ##
=======================================
  Coverage   82.17%   82.17%           
=======================================
  Files          41       41           
  Lines        2552     2552           
=======================================
  Hits         2097     2097           
  Misses        455      455

Continue to review full report at Codecov.

Legend - Click here to learn more
Δ = absolute <relative> (impact), ø = not affected, ? = missing data
Powered by Codecov. Last update d2e1fc6...33e4675. Read the comment docs.

@dowdlelt dowdlelt added documentation issues related to improving documentation for the project hackathon Issues to tackle in the NIH hackathon labels Nov 7, 2019
Copy link
Member

@emdupre emdupre left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

This looks great ! A few comments.

The only structural one (and the most nitpicky) is it would be great if we could start new sentences on new lines !!

docs/approach.rst Show resolved Hide resolved
docs/approach.rst Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
docs/approach.rst Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
@@ -165,24 +183,18 @@ These components are subjected to component selection, the specifics of which
vary according to algorithm.

In the simplest approach, ``tedana`` uses Minka’s MLE to estimate the
dimensionality of the data, which disregards low-variance components.
dimensionality of the data, which disregards low-variance components. (the `mle` option in for `--tedpca`).
Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Suggested change
dimensionality of the data, which disregards low-variance components. (the `mle` option in for `--tedpca`).
dimensionality of the data, which disregards low-variance components (the `mle` option in for `--tedpca`).

Copy link
Collaborator Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I agree - Unacceptable.
image

docs/approach.rst Show resolved Hide resolved
docs/considerations.rst Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
docs/considerations.rst Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
docs/faq.rst Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
docs/faq.rst Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
docs/publications.rst Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
@dowdlelt
Copy link
Collaborator Author

dowdlelt commented Nov 8, 2019

#290 and #336 addressed, I think. lemme know!

@emdupre emdupre changed the title [WIP, DOC] Improving clarity of docs and figures [DOC] Improving clarity of docs and figures Nov 8, 2019
docs/approach.rst Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
docs/approach.rst Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
docs/approach.rst Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
docs/approach.rst Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
docs/approach.rst Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved

A minimum of 3 echoes is required for running the current implementation fo TE-dependent denoising in
``tedana``.
While there are successful studies that don’t follow this rule,
Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Can we invert this sentence ? I'm still a little confused on first read-through, personally 😕

Copy link
Collaborator Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I've removed the not follow language - and just say we need three echoes, but left in the note that dual echo is not what we are talking about here.

docs/faq.rst Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
docs/faq.rst Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
docs/faq.rst Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
docs/faq.rst Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
dowdlelt and others added 9 commits November 8, 2019 15:23
Co-Authored-By: Elizabeth DuPre <emd222@cornell.edu>
Co-Authored-By: Elizabeth DuPre <emd222@cornell.edu>
Co-Authored-By: Elizabeth DuPre <emd222@cornell.edu>
Co-Authored-By: Elizabeth DuPre <emd222@cornell.edu>
@emdupre
Copy link
Member

emdupre commented Nov 8, 2019

I'm so excited !!!!

Final check: Is this ready to merge ?

@dowdlelt
Copy link
Collaborator Author

dowdlelt commented Nov 8, 2019

I believe i have addressed all of your concerns - I believe it is ready to go.

Copy link
Member

@emdupre emdupre left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

But why is the math broken ?! 😭

Copy link
Member

@emdupre emdupre left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Small patches to trigger a new build ?

docs/considerations.rst Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
docs/considerations.rst Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
Co-Authored-By: Elizabeth DuPre <emd222@cornell.edu>
@emdupre emdupre self-requested a review November 8, 2019 21:29
@emdupre
Copy link
Member

emdupre commented Nov 8, 2019

@dowdlelt dowdlelt merged commit 9f62169 into ME-ICA:master Nov 8, 2019
@emdupre
Copy link
Member

emdupre commented Jul 19, 2020

@all-contributors please add @mvaziri for documentation !

@allcontributors
Copy link
Contributor

@emdupre

I've put up a pull request to add @mvaziri! 🎉

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
documentation issues related to improving documentation for the project hackathon Issues to tackle in the NIH hackathon
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

Add acquisition documentation
3 participants