Conversation
|
Caution Review failedThe pull request is closed. WalkthroughThis change comments out direct database query methods for thread retrieval in both the Changes
Sequence Diagram(s)sequenceDiagram
participant Client
participant AgentRpcDO
participant mainDo (Driver)
Client->>AgentRpcDO: listThreads(params)
AgentRpcDO->>mainDo (Driver): list(params)
mainDo (Driver)-->>AgentRpcDO: threads list
AgentRpcDO-->>Client: threads list
Client->>AgentRpcDO: getThread(threadId)
AgentRpcDO->>mainDo (Driver): get(threadId)
mainDo (Driver)-->>AgentRpcDO: thread data
AgentRpcDO-->>Client: thread data
Possibly related PRs
Poem
📜 Recent review detailsConfiguration used: CodeRabbit UI 📒 Files selected for processing (1)
✨ Finishing Touches
Thanks for using CodeRabbit! It's free for OSS, and your support helps us grow. If you like it, consider giving us a shout-out. 🪧 TipsChatThere are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:
SupportNeed help? Create a ticket on our support page for assistance with any issues or questions. Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments. CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)
Other keywords and placeholders
CodeRabbit Configuration File (
|
This stack of pull requests is managed by Graphite. Learn more about stacking. |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
PR Summary
Simplified email thread handling in apps/server/src/routes/chat.ts by removing local database caching layer and directly using mail driver operations.
- Removed
getThreadFromDBandgetThreadsFromDBfunctions to eliminate duplicate caching logic - Updated
listThreads()to directly usemainDo.list()for thread retrieval - Modified
getThread()to usemainDo.get()instead of local cache - Improves maintainability by removing potential sync issues between cache and mail provider
1 file reviewed, no comments
Edit PR Review Bot Settings | Greptile
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Bug: API Contract Violation: Data Source Change
The getThread method now calls this.mainDo.get(threadId) instead of this.mainDo.getThreadFromDB(threadId). This fundamentally changes the data source from a local database cache to a direct external mail API call. The original getThreadFromDB method returned structured IGetThreadResponse data, leveraging database-first caching and fallback sync logic. The new get method returns raw driver data, bypassing this cache. This breaks the API contract, degrades performance due to increased external calls, and impacts data consistency by removing the expected database-first behavior.
apps/server/src/routes/chat.ts#L185-L188
Zero/apps/server/src/routes/chat.ts
Lines 185 to 188 in 4b34a41
BugBot free trial expires on July 22, 2025
You have used $0.00 of your $50.00 spend limit so far. Manage your spend limit in the Cursor dashboard.
Was this report helpful? Give feedback by reacting with 👍 or 👎

READ CAREFULLY THEN REMOVE
Remove bullet points that are not relevant.
PLEASE REFRAIN FROM USING AI TO WRITE YOUR CODE AND PR DESCRIPTION. IF YOU DO USE AI TO WRITE YOUR CODE PLEASE PROVIDE A DESCRIPTION AND REVIEW IT CAREFULLY. MAKE SURE YOU UNDERSTAND THE CODE YOU ARE SUBMITTING USING AI.
Description
Please provide a clear description of your changes.
Type of Change
Please delete options that are not relevant.
Areas Affected
Please check all that apply:
Testing Done
Describe the tests you've done:
Security Considerations
For changes involving data or authentication:
Checklist
Additional Notes
Add any other context about the pull request here.
Screenshots/Recordings
Add screenshots or recordings here if applicable.
By submitting this pull request, I confirm that my contribution is made under the terms of the project's license.
Summary by CodeRabbit