Skip to content

Update README.md#462

Merged
nizzyabi merged 1 commit intostagingfrom
nizzyabi-patch-5
Mar 17, 2025
Merged

Update README.md#462
nizzyabi merged 1 commit intostagingfrom
nizzyabi-patch-5

Conversation

@nizzyabi
Copy link
Collaborator

@nizzyabi nizzyabi commented Mar 17, 2025

READ CAREFULLY THEN REMOVE

Remove bullet points that are not relevant.

PLEASE REFRAIN FROM USING AI TO WRITE YOUR CODE AND PR DESCRIPTION. IF YOU DO USE AI TO WRITE YOUR CODE PLEASE PROVIDE A DESCRIPTION AND REVIEW IT CAREFULLY. MAKE SURE YOU UNDERSTAND THE CODE YOU ARE SUBMITTING USING AI.

  • Pull requests that do not follow these guidelines will be closed without review or comment.
  • If you use AI to write your PR description your pr will be close without review or comment.
  • If you are unsure about anything, feel free to ask for clarification.

Description

Please provide a clear description of your changes.


Type of Change

Please delete options that are not relevant.

  • 🐛 Bug fix (non-breaking change which fixes an issue)
  • ✨ New feature (non-breaking change which adds functionality)
  • 💥 Breaking change (fix or feature with breaking changes)
  • 📝 Documentation update
  • 🎨 UI/UX improvement
  • 🔒 Security enhancement
  • ⚡ Performance improvement

Areas Affected

Please check all that apply:

  • Email Integration (Gmail, IMAP, etc.)
  • User Interface/Experience
  • Authentication/Authorization
  • Data Storage/Management
  • API Endpoints
  • Documentation
  • Testing Infrastructure
  • Development Workflow
  • Deployment/Infrastructure

Testing Done

Describe the tests you've done:

  • Unit tests added/updated
  • Integration tests added/updated
  • Manual testing performed
  • Cross-browser testing (if UI changes)
  • Mobile responsiveness verified (if UI changes)

Security Considerations

For changes involving data or authentication:

  • No sensitive data is exposed
  • Authentication checks are in place
  • Input validation is implemented
  • Rate limiting is considered (if applicable)

Checklist

  • I have read the CONTRIBUTING document
  • My code follows the project's style guidelines
  • I have performed a self-review of my code
  • I have commented my code, particularly in complex areas
  • I have updated the documentation
  • My changes generate no new warnings
  • I have added tests that prove my fix/feature works
  • All tests pass locally
  • Any dependent changes are merged and published

Additional Notes

Add any other context about the pull request here.

Screenshots/Recordings

Add screenshots or recordings here if applicable.


By submitting this pull request, I confirm that my contribution is made under the terms of the project's license.

Summary by CodeRabbit

  • Documentation
    • Updated the project documentation to indicate that the application now requires Bun version 1.2 or higher instead of version 1.0 or higher.

@vercel
Copy link

vercel bot commented Mar 17, 2025

The latest updates on your projects. Learn more about Vercel for Git ↗︎

Name Status Preview Comments Updated (UTC)
0 🔄 Building (Inspect) Visit Preview 💬 Add feedback Mar 17, 2025 5:35am

@nizzyabi nizzyabi merged commit 4cf53ae into staging Mar 17, 2025
2 of 5 checks passed
@coderabbitai
Copy link
Contributor

coderabbitai bot commented Mar 17, 2025

Caution

Review failed

The pull request is closed.

Walkthrough

The update modifies the application's documentation by changing the required Bun runtime version. The README now specifies that Bun version 1.2 or higher is required, replacing the previous requirement of version 1.0 or higher. This ensures that users reference the correct version dependency for the project.

Changes

File Change Summary
README.md Updated Bun runtime requirement from "v1.0 or higher" to "v1.2 or higher"

Suggested Reviewers

  • zerodotemail

Poem

Hopping through docs with a cheerful pace,
I've updated Bun's version in this coding space.
From v1.0 to v1.2, a small leap so fine,
Now the runtime awaits, all in a straight line.
With a twitch of my nose, I celebrate our pace!
🐇✨

Tip

⚡🧪 Multi-step agentic review comment chat (experimental)
  • We're introducing multi-step agentic chat in review comments. This experimental feature enhances review discussions with the CodeRabbit agentic chat by enabling advanced interactions, including the ability to create pull requests directly from comments.
    - To enable this feature, set early_access to true under in the settings.

📜 Recent review details

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between 260cd8b and c51c259.

📒 Files selected for processing (1)
  • README.md (1 hunks)

🪧 Tips

Chat

There are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:

  • Review comments: Directly reply to a review comment made by CodeRabbit. Example:
    • I pushed a fix in commit <commit_id>, please review it.
    • Generate unit testing code for this file.
    • Open a follow-up GitHub issue for this discussion.
  • Files and specific lines of code (under the "Files changed" tab): Tag @coderabbitai in a new review comment at the desired location with your query. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai generate unit testing code for this file.
    • @coderabbitai modularize this function.
  • PR comments: Tag @coderabbitai in a new PR comment to ask questions about the PR branch. For the best results, please provide a very specific query, as very limited context is provided in this mode. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai gather interesting stats about this repository and render them as a table. Additionally, render a pie chart showing the language distribution in the codebase.
    • @coderabbitai read src/utils.ts and generate unit testing code.
    • @coderabbitai read the files in the src/scheduler package and generate a class diagram using mermaid and a README in the markdown format.
    • @coderabbitai help me debug CodeRabbit configuration file.

Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments.

CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)

  • @coderabbitai pause to pause the reviews on a PR.
  • @coderabbitai resume to resume the paused reviews.
  • @coderabbitai review to trigger an incremental review. This is useful when automatic reviews are disabled for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai full review to do a full review from scratch and review all the files again.
  • @coderabbitai summary to regenerate the summary of the PR.
  • @coderabbitai generate docstrings to generate docstrings for this PR.
  • @coderabbitai resolve resolve all the CodeRabbit review comments.
  • @coderabbitai configuration to show the current CodeRabbit configuration for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai help to get help.

Other keywords and placeholders

  • Add @coderabbitai ignore anywhere in the PR description to prevent this PR from being reviewed.
  • Add @coderabbitai summary to generate the high-level summary at a specific location in the PR description.
  • Add @coderabbitai anywhere in the PR title to generate the title automatically.

CodeRabbit Configuration File (.coderabbit.yaml)

  • You can programmatically configure CodeRabbit by adding a .coderabbit.yaml file to the root of your repository.
  • Please see the configuration documentation for more information.
  • If your editor has YAML language server enabled, you can add the path at the top of this file to enable auto-completion and validation: # yaml-language-server: $schema=https://coderabbit.ai/integrations/schema.v2.json

Documentation and Community

  • Visit our Documentation for detailed information on how to use CodeRabbit.
  • Join our Discord Community to get help, request features, and share feedback.
  • Follow us on X/Twitter for updates and announcements.

@nizzyabi nizzyabi deleted the nizzyabi-patch-5 branch March 17, 2025 05:35
@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot mentioned this pull request May 6, 2025
34 tasks
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant