Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Subclass CinderManagers under Openstack #553

Merged
merged 2 commits into from
Jan 21, 2021

Conversation

agrare
Copy link
Member

@agrare agrare commented Jan 18, 2021

Follow-up to #543 but for the CinderManager.

ManageIQ/manageiq#20959

Copy link
Member

@kbrock kbrock left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

This looks like it will work as designed.

This is addressing an invalid use case. So there shouldn't be any.
I don't think this is necessary but understand a little why it was done.

@kbrock
Copy link
Member

kbrock commented Jan 18, 2021

ok, was clarified - it was a generic CinderManager before, now it is one specific to openstack.

Not all `ManageIQ::Providers::Openstack::StorageManager::CinderManager`
should become `ManageIQ::Providers::StorageManager::CinderManager` if we
migrate down.
@miq-bot
Copy link
Member

miq-bot commented Jan 19, 2021

Checked commits agrare/manageiq-schema@beac96f~...6b1e4dc with ruby 2.6.3, rubocop 0.82.0, haml-lint 0.35.0, and yamllint
2 files checked, 0 offenses detected
Everything looks fine. 🏆

@Fryguy Fryguy added the data label Jan 21, 2021
@Fryguy Fryguy merged commit 88aff12 into ManageIQ:master Jan 21, 2021
@agrare agrare deleted the subclass_cinder_manager_openstack branch January 21, 2021 19:28
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants