Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Add missing fields to Middleware views #14115

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Mar 2, 2017

Conversation

cfcosta
Copy link

@cfcosta cfcosta commented Mar 1, 2017

Bugzilla Ticket: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1422584

The fields were not being shown because the associations were not being
loaded. This fixes this, effectively adding data to those columns:

Middleware Servers:

  • Provider

Middleware Domains:

  • Server

Middleware Deployments:

  • Server
  • Hostname

Middleware Datasources:

  • Server
  • Hostname

Middleware Messagings:

  • Server

The fields were not being shown because the associations were not being
loaded. This fixes this, effectively adding data to those columns:

Middleware Servers:
 - Provider
Middleware Domains:
 - Server
Middleware Deployments:
 - Server
 - Hostname
Middleware Datasources:
 - Server
 - Hostname
Middleware Messagings:
 - Server
@miq-bot
Copy link
Member

miq-bot commented Mar 1, 2017

Checked commit cfcosta@c0ad2e8 with ruby 2.2.6, rubocop 0.47.1, and haml-lint 0.20.0
0 files checked, 0 offenses detected
Everything looks good. 🏆

@martinpovolny
Copy link
Member

@kbrock : Please, take a look. Is this ok with regard to #13675 ?

@kbrock
Copy link
Member

kbrock commented Mar 2, 2017

@martinpovolny huh - didn't think I removed any includes that were not in the actual report

I'll scan through that PR again to see if this happened anywhere else

this seems to work from a data layer for me. researching

Copy link
Member

@kbrock kbrock left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LGTM

@kbrock
Copy link
Member

kbrock commented Mar 2, 2017

I don't see why these are necessary. not sure why it is not deriving the proper includes automatically

@cfcosta
Copy link
Author

cfcosta commented Mar 2, 2017

@kbrock what do you think we should do then? Add the includes and then try to fix the bug (in that case defining includes make them a no-op), or try to fix the bug and not merge this?

@kbrock kbrock merged commit 8bd667e into ManageIQ:master Mar 2, 2017
@kbrock kbrock added this to the Sprint 56 Ending Mar 13, 2017 milestone Mar 2, 2017
@kbrock
Copy link
Member

kbrock commented Mar 24, 2017

FYI - I'm rolling back these changes on all views until I can fix underlying problem in the report files. Thank you for bring up this issue and bringing up the fix.

@cfcosta cfcosta deleted the 1422584-add-missing-fields branch March 28, 2017 00:07
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

5 participants