-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 898
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Don't retire load balancers #18443
Don't retire load balancers #18443
Conversation
@miq-bot add_label bug |
We should also remove https://github.com/ManageIQ/manageiq/blob/master/app/models/load_balancer.rb#L5 and check for other retirement references on this object. |
38eb29b
to
4940668
Compare
@d-m-u if this can be backported, can you add the hammer/yes label. |
@miq-bot add_label hammer/yes |
Don't retire load balancers (cherry picked from commit d8a6ba0) https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1678476
Hammer backport details:
|
sorry, i messed up, this should be hammer/no |
…nt_check" This reverts commit 2aa3228.
Reverted the backport:
|
Presently system_context retirement only checks to see if the
evm_owner_id
is present on the object, it doesn't check that that id is that of a valid user. In order to make the check run onevm_owner
we will need to remove load balancers from the list of things to retire in the retirement manager per #18437 (comment) since load balancers don't have owners.Fixes https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1673143. (it doesn't fix it but the related PR does and this is required for the related PR)
related to
#18437