Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Run server logging in the server process #20909

Merged

Conversation

jrafanie
Copy link
Member

@jrafanie jrafanie commented Dec 18, 2020

This change benefits pods by having this logging all in the same log file,
like appliances, by making the same server process log these messages.
This doesn't affect appliances much but will make finding these log
message much easier in pods.

Followup to #20904

@jrafanie jrafanie force-pushed the run_other_schedule_jobs_in_server_process branch from 79baa4a to 79a1ced Compare December 18, 2020 21:15
@jrafanie jrafanie marked this pull request as ready for review December 18, 2020 21:16
This change benefits pods by having this logging all in the same log file,
like appliances, by making the same server process log these messages.
This doesn't affect  appliances much but will make finding these log
message much easier in pods.

Followup to ManageIQ#20904
@jrafanie jrafanie force-pushed the run_other_schedule_jobs_in_server_process branch from 79a1ced to 05e095d Compare December 18, 2020 21:23
@jrafanie jrafanie changed the title Run other server logging in the server process Run server logging in the server process Dec 18, 2020
@miq-bot
Copy link
Member

miq-bot commented Dec 18, 2020

Checked commit jrafanie@05e095d with ruby 2.6.3, rubocop 0.82.0, haml-lint 0.35.0, and yamllint
2 files checked, 0 offenses detected
Everything looks fine. 🍪

@Fryguy Fryguy merged commit 35b003b into ManageIQ:master Jan 4, 2021
@Fryguy Fryguy self-assigned this Jan 4, 2021
@jrafanie jrafanie deleted the run_other_schedule_jobs_in_server_process branch January 4, 2021 20:01
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants