Update Gemfile.lock #567
Update Gemfile.lock #567
Conversation
|
@agrare Could we also update
We can do it as a separate PR as well if people prefer. |
| @@ -360,25 +354,26 @@ GEM | |||
| sync (0.5.0) | |||
| sysexits (1.2.0) | |||
| temple (0.8.2) | |||
| thin (1.7.2) | |||
| thin (1.8.1) | |||
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Absolutely @NickLaMuro ☝️
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Oh! You did a generic bundle update, not just for celluloid. Cool beans. Thanks!
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Yeah celluloid was the only one which was failing on the latest version so I limited it to the prior version.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
celluloid was all the rage for a while but died out after sidekick rewrote to not include it.
TBH, kinda surprised to see it.
agrare
force-pushed
the
update_gemfile_lock
branch
from
0a217b0 to
2820b28
Compare
Fixes `Cannot proxy frozen objects, rspec-mocks relies on proxies for method stubbing and expectations.`
agrare
force-pushed
the
update_gemfile_lock
branch
from
2820b28 to
214e43f
Compare
|
Checked commits agrare/miq_bot@4bb209b~...214e43f with ruby 2.6.3, rubocop 1.13.0, haml-lint 0.35.0, and yamllint |
No description provided.