-
-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 1.1k
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Bump @metamask/keyring-controller
from v6 to v7
#8180
Labels
Comments
13 tasks
plasmacorral
pushed a commit
that referenced
this issue
Jan 6, 2024
## **Description** This PR bumps the `@metamask/keyring-controller` version from `6.0.0` to `7.5.0`. These are the relevant changes to take into consideration during review, - **BREAKING**: Remove `keyringTypes` property from the KeyringController state ([#1441](MetaMask/core#1441)) - **BREAKING**: Constructor `KeyringControllerOptions` type changed ([#1441](MetaMask/core#1441)) - The `KeyringControllerOptions.state` accepted type is now `{ vault?: string }` - The `KeyringControllerOptions.keyringBuilders` type is now `{ (): Keyring<Json>; type: string }[]` - **BREAKING**: The `address` type accepted by the `removeAccount` method is now `Hex` ([#1441](MetaMask/core#1441)) - **BREAKING**: The `signTypedMessage` method now returns a `Promise<string>` ([#1441](MetaMask/core#1441)) - **BREAKING**: The `signTransaction` method now requires a `TypedTransaction` from `@ethereumjs/tx@^4` for the `transaction` argument, and returns a `Promise<TxData>` ([#1441](MetaMask/core#1441)) - **BREAKING:** Rename `Keyring` type to `KeyringObject` ([#1441](MetaMask/core#1441)) - **BREAKING:** `addNewAccount` now throws if address of new account is not a hex string ([#1441](MetaMask/core#1441)) - **BREAKING:** `exportSeedPhrase` now throws if first keyring does not have a mnemonic ([#1441](MetaMask/core#1441)) - **BREAKING:** `verifySeedPhrase` now throws if HD keyring does not have a mnemonic ([#1441](MetaMask/core#1441)) ## **Related issues** Fixes: #8180 ## **Manual testing steps** Use cases or flows to verify, 1. Onboarding 2. Import SRP 3. Import private key 4. Reveal SRP 5. Reveal private key 6. Add new account 7. Connect QR wallet 8. Signed type messages 9. Remove imported account 10. Lock and unlock wallet ## **Screenshots/Recordings** <!-- If applicable, add screenshots and/or recordings to visualize the before and after of your change. --> ### **Before** <!-- [screenshots/recordings] --> ### **After** <!-- [screenshots/recordings] --> ## **Pre-merge author checklist** - [ ] I’ve followed [MetaMask Coding Standards](https://github.com/MetaMask/metamask-mobile/blob/main/.github/guidelines/CODING_GUIDELINES.md). - [ ] I've clearly explained what problem this PR is solving and how it is solved. - [ ] I've linked related issues - [ ] I've included manual testing steps - [ ] I've included screenshots/recordings if applicable - [ ] I’ve included tests if applicable - [ ] I’ve documented my code using [JSDoc](https://jsdoc.app/) format if applicable - [ ] I’ve applied the right labels on the PR (see [labeling guidelines](https://github.com/MetaMask/metamask-mobile/blob/main/.github/guidelines/LABELING_GUIDELINES.md)). Not required for external contributors. - [ ] I’ve properly set the pull request status: - [ ] In case it's not yet "ready for review", I've set it to "draft". - [ ] In case it's "ready for review", I've changed it from "draft" to "non-draft". ## **Pre-merge reviewer checklist** - [X ] I've manually tested the PR (e.g. pull and build branch, run the app, test code being changed). - [X ] I confirm that this PR addresses all acceptance criteria described in the ticket it closes and includes the necessary testing evidence such as recordings and or screenshots.
metamaskbot
added
the
release-7.15.0
Issue or pull request that will be included in release 7.15.0
label
Jan 6, 2024
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Labels
What is this about?
Bump
@metamask/keyring-controller
from v6 to v7Scenario
No response
Design
No response
Technical Details
No response
Threat Modeling Framework
No response
Acceptance Criteria
No response
Stakeholder review needed before the work gets merged
References
No response
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: