Conversation
- QuestionTitle 컴포넌트 - Choice 컴포넌트
Co-Authored-By: 김준서 Junseo Kim <semiwest2@gmail.com>
Co-Authored-By: 김준서 Junseo Kim <semiwest2@gmail.com>
- 프로퍼티에서 객체로 변경 Co-Authored-By: 김준서 Junseo Kim <semiwest2@gmail.com>
Co-Authored-By: 김준서 Junseo Kim <semiwest2@gmail.com>
Co-Authored-By: 김준서 Junseo Kim <semiwest2@gmail.com>
Co-Authored-By: 김준서 Junseo Kim <semiwest2@gmail.com>
Co-Authored-By: 김준서 Junseo Kim <semiwest2@gmail.com>
Co-Authored-By: 김준서 Junseo Kim <semiwest2@gmail.com>
Co-Authored-By: 김준서 Junseo Kim <semiwest2@gmail.com>
- ShortTextProps, ChoiceProps를 QuestionComponentProps으로 확장 Co-Authored-By: 김준서 Junseo Kim <semiwest2@gmail.com>
Co-Authored-By: 김준서 Junseo Kim <semiwest2@gmail.com>
✅ Deploy Preview for moadong ready!
To edit notification comments on pull requests, go to your Netlify project configuration. |
|
Warning
|
| 파일(그룹) | 변경 요약 |
|---|---|
frontend/src/types/application.ts |
Question, QuestionType 등 지원서 관련 타입 및 인터페이스 신규 정의 및 export |
frontend/src/pages/AdminPage/application/CreateForm.tsx.../components/QuestionBuilder/QuestionBuilder.tsx.../fields/ShortText.tsx.../fields/Choice.tsx |
Question, QuestionType 등 로컬 타입 선언 제거, 중앙 타입 파일에서 import로 대체 |
.../components/QuestionBuilder/QuestionBuilder.tsx.../fields/Choice.tsx.../fields/ShortText.tsx |
props 구조 변경: required → options 객체, prop 이름 명확화(onChange → onTitleChange 등) |
.../components/QuestionDescription/QuestionDescription.tsx.../components/QuestionTitle/QuestionTitle.tsx.../fields/ShortText.tsx.../fields/Choice.tsx |
prop 이름 변경: onChange → onDescriptionChange, onTitleChange 등 일관성 부여 |
.../components/QuestionTitle/QuestionTitle.styles.ts.../fields/Choice.styles.ts |
스타일 컴포넌트 분리 및 신규 정의, 기존 인라인 스타일 제거 |
Sequence Diagram(s)
sequenceDiagram
participant AdminPage
participant CreateForm
participant QuestionBuilder
participant QuestionTitle
participant QuestionDescription
participant ShortText/Choice
AdminPage->>CreateForm: 렌더링
CreateForm->>QuestionBuilder: questions 배열 전달 (with options)
QuestionBuilder->>QuestionTitle: id, title, options, onTitleChange 등 전달
QuestionBuilder->>QuestionDescription: description, onDescriptionChange 전달
QuestionBuilder->>ShortText/Choice: type, options, 기타 props 전달
ShortText/Choice->>QuestionTitle/QuestionDescription: props 전달 및 렌더링
Assessment against linked issues
| Objective | Addressed | Explanation |
|---|---|---|
| 지원서 타입 분리 (FE-126) | ✅ |
Assessment against linked issues: Out-of-scope changes
(해당 PR에서 명확히 범위를 벗어난 변경사항은 발견되지 않았습니다.)
Possibly related PRs
- Moadong/moadong#445: 이 PR에서 리팩토링된 Question 컴포넌트 및 CreateForm의 초기 구현과 직접적으로 연관되어 있습니다.
Suggested labels
🎨 Design
Suggested reviewers
- oesnuj
✨ Finishing Touches
- 📝 Generate Docstrings
Thanks for using CodeRabbit! It's free for OSS, and your support helps us grow. If you like it, consider giving us a shout-out.
🪧 Tips
Chat
There are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:
- Review comments: Directly reply to a review comment made by CodeRabbit. Example:
I pushed a fix in commit <commit_id>, please review it.Explain this complex logic.Open a follow-up GitHub issue for this discussion.
- Files and specific lines of code (under the "Files changed" tab): Tag
@coderabbitaiin a new review comment at the desired location with your query. Examples:@coderabbitai explain this code block.@coderabbitai modularize this function.
- PR comments: Tag
@coderabbitaiin a new PR comment to ask questions about the PR branch. For the best results, please provide a very specific query, as very limited context is provided in this mode. Examples:@coderabbitai gather interesting stats about this repository and render them as a table. Additionally, render a pie chart showing the language distribution in the codebase.@coderabbitai read src/utils.ts and explain its main purpose.@coderabbitai read the files in the src/scheduler package and generate a class diagram using mermaid and a README in the markdown format.@coderabbitai help me debug CodeRabbit configuration file.
Support
Need help? Create a ticket on our support page for assistance with any issues or questions.
Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments.
CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)
@coderabbitai pauseto pause the reviews on a PR.@coderabbitai resumeto resume the paused reviews.@coderabbitai reviewto trigger an incremental review. This is useful when automatic reviews are disabled for the repository.@coderabbitai full reviewto do a full review from scratch and review all the files again.@coderabbitai summaryto regenerate the summary of the PR.@coderabbitai generate docstringsto generate docstrings for this PR.@coderabbitai generate sequence diagramto generate a sequence diagram of the changes in this PR.@coderabbitai resolveresolve all the CodeRabbit review comments.@coderabbitai configurationto show the current CodeRabbit configuration for the repository.@coderabbitai helpto get help.
Other keywords and placeholders
- Add
@coderabbitai ignoreanywhere in the PR description to prevent this PR from being reviewed. - Add
@coderabbitai summaryto generate the high-level summary at a specific location in the PR description. - Add
@coderabbitaianywhere in the PR title to generate the title automatically.
Documentation and Community
- Visit our Documentation for detailed information on how to use CodeRabbit.
- Join our Discord Community to get help, request features, and share feedback.
- Follow us on X/Twitter for updates and announcements.
Codecov ReportAttention: Patch coverage is 📢 Thoughts on this report? Let us know! |
oesnuj
left a comment
oesnuj
left a comment
There was a problem hiding this comment.
페어프로그래밍 재밌었습니다
다음 작업도 화이팅~~ 🚀 🚀
![coderabbitai[bot]](https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/in/347564?s=60&v=4){kind=small}
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 2
🧹 Nitpick comments (4)
frontend/src/types/application.ts (2)
10-19: Question 인터페이스의 options 구조를 확장 가능하게 개선하는 것을 고려해보세요.현재
options가required만 포함하고 있지만, 향후 다른 옵션들(예: placeholder, validation rules 등)이 추가될 수 있습니다.export interface Question { id: number; title: string; description: string; type: QuestionType; options: { required: boolean; + placeholder?: string; + validation?: { + minLength?: number; + maxLength?: number; + pattern?: string; + }; }; items?: { value: string }[]; }
29-37: QuestionComponentProps 인터페이스가 export되지 않았습니다.이 인터페이스가 다른 컴포넌트에서도 사용될 가능성이 있다면 export하는 것을 고려해보세요.
-interface QuestionComponentProps { +export interface QuestionComponentProps {frontend/src/pages/AdminPage/application/fields/Choice.styles.ts (2)
3-13:AddItemButton스타일 확인 및 테마 변수 적용 제안
현재 패딩·색상·여백이 하드코딩되어 있습니다. 유지보수를 위해theme의 spacing, color 변수를 참조하도록 리팩토링을 고려해 보세요.🧰 Tools
🪛 GitHub Check: codecov/patch
[warning] 3-3: frontend/src/pages/AdminPage/application/fields/Choice.styles.ts#L3
Added line #L3 was not covered by tests
22-30:DeleteButton에 호버/포커스 상태 추가 제안
현재 포인터 커서만 지정되어 있어 접근성 향상을 위해:hover나:focus시 배경・테두리 색 변화를 추가하면 좋습니다.🧰 Tools
🪛 GitHub Check: codecov/patch
[warning] 22-22: frontend/src/pages/AdminPage/application/fields/Choice.styles.ts#L22
Added line #L22 was not covered by tests
📜 Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro
📒 Files selected for processing (9)
frontend/src/pages/AdminPage/application/CreateForm.tsx(3 hunks)frontend/src/pages/AdminPage/application/components/QuestionBuilder/QuestionBuilder.tsx(4 hunks)frontend/src/pages/AdminPage/application/components/QuestionDescription/QuestionDescription.tsx(3 hunks)frontend/src/pages/AdminPage/application/components/QuestionTitle/QuestionTitle.styles.ts(1 hunks)frontend/src/pages/AdminPage/application/components/QuestionTitle/QuestionTitle.tsx(1 hunks)frontend/src/pages/AdminPage/application/fields/Choice.styles.ts(1 hunks)frontend/src/pages/AdminPage/application/fields/Choice.tsx(2 hunks)frontend/src/pages/AdminPage/application/fields/ShortText.tsx(3 hunks)frontend/src/types/application.ts(1 hunks)
🧰 Additional context used
🧬 Code Graph Analysis (1)
frontend/src/pages/AdminPage/application/CreateForm.tsx (1)
frontend/src/types/application.ts (1)
Question(10-19)
🪛 GitHub Check: codecov/patch
frontend/src/pages/AdminPage/application/fields/Choice.tsx
[warning] 1-1: frontend/src/pages/AdminPage/application/fields/Choice.tsx#L1
Added line #L1 was not covered by tests
[warning] 57-57: frontend/src/pages/AdminPage/application/fields/Choice.tsx#L57
Added line #L57 was not covered by tests
[warning] 65-65: frontend/src/pages/AdminPage/application/fields/Choice.tsx#L65
Added line #L65 was not covered by tests
frontend/src/pages/AdminPage/application/fields/Choice.styles.ts
[warning] 1-1: frontend/src/pages/AdminPage/application/fields/Choice.styles.ts#L1
Added line #L1 was not covered by tests
[warning] 3-3: frontend/src/pages/AdminPage/application/fields/Choice.styles.ts#L3
Added line #L3 was not covered by tests
[warning] 15-15: frontend/src/pages/AdminPage/application/fields/Choice.styles.ts#L15
Added line #L15 was not covered by tests
[warning] 22-22: frontend/src/pages/AdminPage/application/fields/Choice.styles.ts#L22
Added line #L22 was not covered by tests
frontend/src/pages/AdminPage/application/components/QuestionTitle/QuestionTitle.tsx
[warning] 1-1: frontend/src/pages/AdminPage/application/components/QuestionTitle/QuestionTitle.tsx#L1
Added line #L1 was not covered by tests
frontend/src/pages/AdminPage/application/components/QuestionTitle/QuestionTitle.styles.ts
[warning] 1-1: frontend/src/pages/AdminPage/application/components/QuestionTitle/QuestionTitle.styles.ts#L1
Added line #L1 was not covered by tests
[warning] 3-3: frontend/src/pages/AdminPage/application/components/QuestionTitle/QuestionTitle.styles.ts#L3
Added line #L3 was not covered by tests
[warning] 9-9: frontend/src/pages/AdminPage/application/components/QuestionTitle/QuestionTitle.styles.ts#L9
Added line #L9 was not covered by tests
[warning] 16-16: frontend/src/pages/AdminPage/application/components/QuestionTitle/QuestionTitle.styles.ts#L16
Added line #L16 was not covered by tests
[warning] 25-25: frontend/src/pages/AdminPage/application/components/QuestionTitle/QuestionTitle.styles.ts#L25
Added line #L25 was not covered by tests
🔇 Additional comments (17)
frontend/src/pages/AdminPage/application/components/QuestionTitle/QuestionTitle.styles.ts (1)
1-31: 스타일 컴포넌트 분리가 잘 구현되었습니다.인라인 스타일 컴포넌트를 별도 파일로 분리하여 코드의 가독성과 유지보수성이 향상되었습니다. 각 스타일 컴포넌트들이 의미적으로 명확하게 명명되어 있고, 스타일 정의도 일관성 있게 작성되었습니다.
🧰 Tools
🪛 GitHub Check: codecov/patch
[warning] 1-1: frontend/src/pages/AdminPage/application/components/QuestionTitle/QuestionTitle.styles.ts#L1
Added line #L1 was not covered by tests
[warning] 3-3: frontend/src/pages/AdminPage/application/components/QuestionTitle/QuestionTitle.styles.ts#L3
Added line #L3 was not covered by tests
[warning] 9-9: frontend/src/pages/AdminPage/application/components/QuestionTitle/QuestionTitle.styles.ts#L9
Added line #L9 was not covered by tests
[warning] 16-16: frontend/src/pages/AdminPage/application/components/QuestionTitle/QuestionTitle.styles.ts#L16
Added line #L16 was not covered by tests
[warning] 25-25: frontend/src/pages/AdminPage/application/components/QuestionTitle/QuestionTitle.styles.ts#L25
Added line #L25 was not covered by testsfrontend/src/types/application.ts (1)
1-8: QuestionType 유니온 타입이 잘 정의되었습니다.다양한 질문 유형을 포괄하는 타입이 명확하게 정의되어 있어 타입 안전성이 보장됩니다.
frontend/src/pages/AdminPage/application/components/QuestionDescription/QuestionDescription.tsx (1)
6-6: props 이름이 더 명확하게 개선되었습니다.
onChange에서onDescriptionChange로 변경하여 콜백 함수의 목적이 더 명확해졌습니다. 이는 다른 컴포넌트들과의 일관성도 향상시킵니다.Also applies to: 22-22, 31-31
frontend/src/pages/AdminPage/application/CreateForm.tsx (2)
6-7: 중앙화된 타입 정의 사용이 잘 적용되었습니다.기존 로컬 타입 정의를 제거하고 중앙화된 타입을 import하여 코드의 일관성과 유지보수성이 향상되었습니다.
12-12: 명시적 id 필드 추가가 좋은 개선입니다.질문 객체에 명시적인
id필드를 추가하여 데이터 구조가 더 명확해졌습니다.Also applies to: 21-21
frontend/src/pages/AdminPage/application/components/QuestionTitle/QuestionTitle.tsx (3)
1-1: 스타일 분리가 잘 이루어졌습니다.스타일 컴포넌트들을 별도 파일로 분리하여 관심사 분리가 개선되었습니다.
🧰 Tools
🪛 GitHub Check: codecov/patch
[warning] 1-1: frontend/src/pages/AdminPage/application/components/QuestionTitle/QuestionTitle.tsx#L1
Added line #L1 was not covered by tests
8-8: prop 이름 변경이 명확성을 향상시킵니다.
onChange를onTitleChange로 변경한 것은 해당 콜백의 목적을 더 명확하게 표현합니다. 다른 컴포넌트들과의 일관성도 개선되었습니다.Also applies to: 16-16, 27-27
19-21: 스타일 컴포넌트 사용이 일관성 있게 적용되었습니다.모든 스타일 컴포넌트가
Stylednamespace를 통해 일관성 있게 사용되고 있습니다.Also applies to: 29-30
frontend/src/pages/AdminPage/application/fields/Choice.tsx (3)
6-6: 타입 중앙화가 성공적으로 이루어졌습니다.
ChoiceProps를@/types/application에서 import하여 타입 정의가 중앙화되었습니다. 이는 코드 일관성과 유지보수성을 크게 향상시킵니다.
49-49: prop 이름이 명확하게 개선되었습니다.
onTitleChange와onDescriptionChange로 변경된 prop 이름들이 각각의 역할을 더 명확하게 표현합니다.Also applies to: 54-54
1-1: 스타일 분리와 컴포넌트 사용이 올바르게 적용되었습니다.스타일 컴포넌트들이 별도 파일로 분리되었고,
Stylednamespace를 통해 일관성 있게 사용되고 있습니다.Also applies to: 57-57, 65-67, 73-75
🧰 Tools
🪛 GitHub Check: codecov/patch
[warning] 1-1: frontend/src/pages/AdminPage/application/fields/Choice.tsx#L1
Added line #L1 was not covered by testsfrontend/src/pages/AdminPage/application/components/QuestionBuilder/QuestionBuilder.tsx (2)
6-7: 타입 정의 중앙화가 성공적으로 완료되었습니다.
QuestionType과QuestionBuilderProps를@/types/application에서 import하여 타입 정의의 일관성이 향상되었습니다.
13-13: options 패턴으로 변경이 잘 구현되었습니다.
requiredboolean prop을options?.required패턴으로 변경한 것은 향후 확장성을 고려한 좋은 설계입니다. 옵셔널 체이닝을 통해 안전하게 처리되고 있습니다.Also applies to: 44-44, 58-58, 104-104, 107-107
frontend/src/pages/AdminPage/application/fields/ShortText.tsx (2)
5-5: 타입 중앙화가 올바르게 적용되었습니다.
ShortTextProps를@/types/application에서 import하여 타입 정의의 중앙화가 완료되었습니다.
14-14: prop 이름 변경이 일관성 있게 적용되었습니다.
onAnswerChange,onTitleChange,onDescriptionChange로 변경된 prop 이름들이 각각의 역할을 명확하게 표현하며, 다른 컴포넌트들과의 일관성도 유지되고 있습니다.Also applies to: 25-25, 30-30, 34-34
frontend/src/pages/AdminPage/application/fields/Choice.styles.ts (2)
1-2:styled-componentsimport 승인 및 테스트 커버리지 경고 무시
스타일 컴포넌트 파일은 UI 렌더링 전용이므로 유닛 테스트에서 커버하지 않아도 무방합니다. 코드 커버리지 경고는 무시하셔도 좋습니다.🧰 Tools
🪛 GitHub Check: codecov/patch
[warning] 1-1: frontend/src/pages/AdminPage/application/fields/Choice.styles.ts#L1
Added line #L1 was not covered by tests
15-20:ItemWrapper스타일 승인
flex 레이아웃과 gap 설정이 적절하며, 읽기 쉬운 구조입니다.🧰 Tools
🪛 GitHub Check: codecov/patch
[warning] 15-15: frontend/src/pages/AdminPage/application/fields/Choice.styles.ts#L15
Added line #L15 was not covered by tests
| export interface QuestionBuilderProps extends Question { | ||
| onTitleChange: (value: string) => void; | ||
| onDescriptionChange: (value: string) => void; | ||
| onItemsChange?: (newItems: { value: string }[]) => void; | ||
| onTypeChange?: (type: QuestionType) => void; | ||
| onRequiredChange?: (required: boolean) => void; | ||
| } |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
💡 Verification agent
🧩 Analysis chain
콜백 함수들의 필수/선택 여부를 검토해보세요.
일부 중요한 콜백 함수들이 선택적(optional)으로 정의되어 있는데, 실제 사용 시 필수적일 수 있습니다. 실제 사용 패턴을 확인하여 적절한 타입 정의를 적용하세요.
다음 스크립트로 실제 사용 패턴을 확인해보세요:
🏁 Script executed:
#!/bin/bash
# Description: QuestionBuilderProps의 콜백 함수 사용 패턴 확인
# QuestionBuilder 컴포넌트에서 이러한 콜백들이 어떻게 사용되는지 확인
rg -A 10 -B 5 "QuestionBuilderProps" --type ts --type tsxLength of output: 85
tsx 파일도 포함해 전체 파일에서 검색해 보겠습니다. 다음 스크립트를 실행해 주세요:
🏁 Script executed:
#!/bin/bash
# QuestionBuilderProps의 사용 패턴을 전체 파일에서 확인
rg -A 10 -B 5 "QuestionBuilderProps"Length of output: 4534
QuestionBuilder 컴포넌트 내부에서 콜백들이 실제로 어떻게 호출되는지 확인해 보겠습니다. 다음 스크립트를 실행해 주세요:
🏁 Script executed:
#!/bin/bash
# QuestionBuilder 컴포넌트에서 콜백 호출 패턴 확인
rg -n -C3 "onTitleChange" frontend/src/pages/AdminPage/application/components/QuestionBuilder/QuestionBuilder.tsx
rg -n -C3 "onDescriptionChange" frontend/src/pages/AdminPage/application/components/QuestionBuilder/QuestionBuilder.tsx
rg -n -C3 "onItemsChange" frontend/src/pages/AdminPage/application/components/QuestionBuilder/QuestionBuilder.tsx
rg -n -C3 "onTypeChange" frontend/src/pages/AdminPage/application/components/QuestionBuilder/QuestionBuilder.tsx
rg -n -C3 "onRequiredChange" frontend/src/pages/AdminPage/application/components/QuestionBuilder/QuestionBuilder.tsxLength of output: 3785
AdminPage에서 QuestionBuilder가 어떻게 사용되며 콜백이 실제로 모두 전달되는지 확인해보겠습니다. 아래 스크립트를 실행해주세요:
🏁 Script executed:
#!/bin/bash
# QuestionBuilder 사용 위치 및 전달되는 props 확인
rg -n "<QuestionBuilder" -n frontend/src/pages/AdminPageLength of output: 143
CreateForm.tsx에서 QuestionBuilder에 전달되는 모든 props를 확인해보겠습니다. 다음 스크립트를 실행해주세요:
🏁 Script executed:
#!/bin/bash
# CreateForm에서 QuestionBuilder 호출부 확인 (90~140행)
sed -n '90,140p' frontend/src/pages/AdminPage/application/CreateForm.tsxLength of output: 1035
QuestionBuilderProps 콜백 함수 필수화 제안
CreateForm.tsx에서 QuestionBuilder를 사용할 때 모든 콜백(onItemsChange, onTypeChange, onRequiredChange)이 항상 전달되므로, 인터페이스에서 선택(optional)으로 정의된 부분을 필수(required)로 변경하는 것이 안전합니다.아울러 컴포넌트 내 optional chaining(?.)도 제거하여 타입·실행 일관성을 맞출 수 있습니다.
수정 대상:
frontend/src/types/application.ts(QuestionBuilderProps 정의)frontend/src/pages/AdminPage/application/components/QuestionBuilder/QuestionBuilder.tsx(optional chaining 제거)
예시 diff (application.ts):
export interface QuestionBuilderProps extends Question {
onTitleChange: (value: string) => void;
onDescriptionChange: (value: string) => void;
- onItemsChange?: (newItems: { value: string }[]) => void;
- onTypeChange?: (type: QuestionType) => void;
- onRequiredChange?: (required: boolean) => void;
+ onItemsChange: (newItems: { value: string }[]) => void;
+ onTypeChange: (type: QuestionType) => void;
+ onRequiredChange: (required: boolean) => void;
}QuestionBuilder.tsx 내:
onTypeChange?.('CHOICE')→onTypeChange('CHOICE')onTypeChange?.('MULTI_CHOICE')→onTypeChange('MULTI_CHOICE')onTypeChange?.(selectedType)→onTypeChange(selectedType)onRequiredChange?.(!options?.required)→onRequiredChange(!options.required)
이렇게 변경하면 타입스크립트 레벨에서 누락된 콜백 전달을 방지하고, 컴포넌트 내부에서 불필요한 optional chaining을 제거할 수 있습니다.
📝 Committable suggestion
‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.
| export interface QuestionBuilderProps extends Question { | |
| onTitleChange: (value: string) => void; | |
| onDescriptionChange: (value: string) => void; | |
| onItemsChange?: (newItems: { value: string }[]) => void; | |
| onTypeChange?: (type: QuestionType) => void; | |
| onRequiredChange?: (required: boolean) => void; | |
| } | |
| export interface QuestionBuilderProps extends Question { | |
| onTitleChange: (value: string) => void; | |
| onDescriptionChange: (value: string) => void; | |
| onItemsChange: (newItems: { value: string }[]) => void; | |
| onTypeChange: (type: QuestionType) => void; | |
| onRequiredChange: (required: boolean) => void; | |
| } |
🤖 Prompt for AI Agents
In frontend/src/types/application.ts lines 21 to 27, the callback functions
onItemsChange, onTypeChange, and onRequiredChange are currently optional but are
always passed in actual usage. Change their definitions to required (remove the
optional '?') to reflect this. Then, in
frontend/src/pages/AdminPage/application/components/QuestionBuilder/QuestionBuilder.tsx,
remove all optional chaining (?.) when calling these callbacks to ensure
consistent typing and execution.
| title={question.title} | ||
| description={question.description} | ||
| required={question.options?.required ?? false} | ||
| options={question.options ?? false} |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
💡 Verification agent
🧩 Analysis chain
options prop의 타입 불일치를 수정해야 합니다.
question.options ?? false는 타입 불일치를 발생시킵니다. Question 인터페이스에 따르면 options는 객체여야 하는데, fallback으로 false(boolean)를 전달하고 있습니다.
다음과 같이 수정하세요:
- options={question.options ?? false}
+ options={question.options ?? { required: false }}또는 QuestionBuilder 컴포넌트에서 options가 실제로 어떤 타입을 기대하는지 확인이 필요합니다.
다음 스크립트로 QuestionBuilder의 props 타입을 확인해보세요:
🏁 Script executed:
#!/bin/bash
# Description: QuestionBuilder 컴포넌트의 options prop 타입 확인
# QuestionBuilder 컴포넌트의 인터페이스 정의 확인
ast-grep --pattern 'interface $_ {
$$$
options: $_
$$$
}'
# QuestionBuilder 컴포넌트에서 options prop 사용 방법 확인
rg -A 5 -B 5 "options.*:" frontend/src/pages/AdminPage/application/components/QuestionBuilder/Length of output: 710
QuestionBuilder 컴포넌트의 props 타입 정의를 찾을 수 없어 타입 확인이 불가능합니다. 아래 스크립트로 컴포넌트 파일 경로를 탐색하고, props 인터페이스를 조회해 주세요:
🏁 Script executed:
#!/bin/bash
# 1. QuestionBuilder 컴포넌트 파일 경로 찾기
echo "== QuestionBuilder 파일 경로 =="
fd --hidden --full-path QuestionBuilder -t f
# 2. 첫 번째로 찾은 파일을 열어 상단 200줄 출력
FILE=$(fd --hidden --full-path QuestionBuilder -t f | head -n1)
echo "== 파일: $FILE =="
sed -n '1,200p' "$FILE"
# 3. props 인터페이스 또는 타입 선언 조회
echo "== props 인터페이스/타입 검색 =="
rg -A3 -B3 "interface .*QuestionBuilder" "$FILE"
rg -A3 -B3 "type .*QuestionBuilderProps" "$FILE"
rg -A3 -B3 "QuestionBuilder\s*[:=]\s*React\.(FC|FunctionComponent)" -n "$FILE"Length of output: 3402
아직 QuestionBuilder.tsx 파일의 props 타입을 확인하지 못했습니다. 아래 스크립트로 실제 컴포넌트 파일에서 options 타입 정의를 조회해 주세요:
🏁 Script executed:
#!/bin/bash
# 1. QuestionBuilder.tsx 파일 경로 찾기
echo "== QuestionBuilder.tsx 파일 경로 =="
fd --hidden -t f 'QuestionBuilder.tsx'
# 2. 상단 200줄 출력하여 props 선언 확인
FILE=$(fd --hidden -t f 'QuestionBuilder.tsx' | head -n1)
echo "== 파일: $FILE =="
sed -n '1,200p' "$FILE"
# 3. props 인터페이스/타입 및 options 사용 검색
echo "== props 인터페이스/타입 선언 =="
rg -C3 "interface .*Props" "$FILE"
rg -C3 "type .*Props" "$FILE"
rg -C3 "QuestionBuilder\s*[:=]\s*React\.(FC|FunctionComponent)" -n "$FILE"
echo "== options prop 사용 검색 =="
rg -C3 "options" "$FILE"Length of output: 5857
아래 스크립트로 QuestionBuilderProps에서 options의 정확한 타입 선언을 확인해주세요:
🏁 Script executed:
#!/bin/bash
# QuestionBuilderProps 타입 정의 조회
echo "== QuestionBuilderProps 정의 =="
rg -n "QuestionBuilderProps" -C5 frontend/src/types/application.ts || trueLength of output: 533
options prop 타입 일치하도록 기본값 수정 필요
QuestionBuilderProps의 options는 { required: boolean } 객체 타입이기 때문에 boolean(false)을 넘기면 타입 불일치가 발생합니다. 기본값으로 객체를 전달하도록 수정하세요.
- 수정 위치:
frontend/src/pages/AdminPage/application/CreateForm.tsx(113행)
- options={question.options ?? false}
+ options={question.options ?? { required: false }}📝 Committable suggestion
‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.
| options={question.options ?? false} | |
| options={question.options ?? { required: false }} |
🤖 Prompt for AI Agents
In frontend/src/pages/AdminPage/application/CreateForm.tsx at line 113, the
options prop is assigned a fallback value of false, causing a type mismatch
since options expects an object type like { required: boolean }. Fix this by
changing the fallback from false to an object with the appropriate shape, for
example { required: false }, to match the expected type.
2 participants
#️⃣연관된 이슈
📝작업 내용
중점적으로 리뷰받고 싶은 부분(선택)
논의하고 싶은 부분(선택)
🫡 참고사항
Summary by CodeRabbit
Refactor
New Features
Documentation