Conversation
- 지원서 전체 타입 추가 Co-Authored-By: 김준서 Junseo Kim <semiwest2@gmail.com>
Co-Authored-By: 김준서 Junseo Kim <semiwest2@gmail.com>
Co-Authored-By: 김준서 Junseo Kim <semiwest2@gmail.com>
Co-Authored-By: 김준서 Junseo Kim <semiwest2@gmail.com>
Co-Authored-By: 김준서 Junseo Kim <semiwest2@gmail.com>
Co-Authored-By: 김준서 Junseo Kim <semiwest2@gmail.com>
Co-Authored-By: 김준서 Junseo Kim <semiwest2@gmail.com>
Co-Authored-By: 김준서 Junseo Kim <semiwest2@gmail.com>
Co-Authored-By: 김준서 Junseo Kim <semiwest2@gmail.com>
Co-Authored-By: 김준서 Junseo Kim <semiwest2@gmail.com>
- LONG_TEXT case추가 Co-Authored-By: 김준서 Junseo Kim <semiwest2@gmail.com>
Co-Authored-By: 김준서 Junseo Kim <semiwest2@gmail.com>
Co-Authored-By: 김준서 Junseo Kim <semiwest2@gmail.com>
Co-Authored-By: 김준서 Junseo Kim <semiwest2@gmail.com>
- 지원서 제목 추가 - 제목 수정 onChange추가 - 질문 리스트 Container스타일 추가 Co-Authored-By: 김준서 Junseo Kim <semiwest2@gmail.com>
Co-Authored-By: 김준서 Junseo Kim <semiwest2@gmail.com>
✅ Deploy Preview for moadong ready!
To edit notification comments on pull requests, go to your Netlify project configuration. |
|
Warning
|
| 파일/경로 요약 | 변경 요약 |
|---|---|
| frontend/src/App.tsx | 라우트 컴포넌트 및 import를 CreateForm에서 CreateApplicationForm으로 변경 |
| frontend/src/constants/INITIAL_FORM_DATA.ts | INITIAL_FORM_DATA 상수 추가 및 export (초기 폼 데이터 정의) |
| frontend/src/mocks/api/apply.ts | GET /apply/:clubId 응답 필드명 form_title로 수정 |
| frontend/src/mocks/data/mockData.ts | ApplicationFormData 타입 적용, title → form_title로 변경, 질문 ID 일련번호화, 불필요한 인터페이스 제거 |
| frontend/src/pages/AdminPage/application/CreateApplicationForm.styles.ts | FormTitle, QuestionContainer styled-components 추가 |
| frontend/src/pages/AdminPage/application/CreateApplicationForm.tsx | CreateApplicationForm 컴포넌트 신설(상태 관리 및 UI 렌더링, 핸들러 포함), default export |
| frontend/src/pages/AdminPage/application/CreateForm.tsx | 기존 CreateForm 컴포넌트 파일 삭제 |
| frontend/src/pages/AdminPage/application/components/QuestionBuilder/QuestionBuilder.styles.ts | QuestionFieldContainer styled-component 추가 |
| frontend/src/pages/AdminPage/application/components/QuestionBuilder/QuestionBuilder.tsx | 지원하지 않는 질문 타입 시 렌더링 차단, LONG_TEXT 처리 추가, 스타일 컨테이너로 감쌈 |
| frontend/src/types/application.ts | QUESTION_TYPE_LIST 상수 및 ApplicationFormData 인터페이스 추가, QuestionType 타입 개선 |
Sequence Diagram(s)
sequenceDiagram
participant Admin as AdminPage
participant CreateForm as CreateApplicationForm
participant State as useState
participant QuestionBuilder as QuestionBuilder
Admin->>CreateForm: 렌더링 요청
CreateForm->>State: INITIAL_FORM_DATA로 상태 초기화
loop 질문 목록 렌더링
CreateForm->>QuestionBuilder: 각 질문 데이터 및 핸들러 전달
QuestionBuilder-->>CreateForm: 변경 이벤트 발생 시 콜백 호출
CreateForm->>State: 상태 업데이트
end
Assessment against linked issues
| Objective | Addressed | Explanation |
|---|---|---|
/adminPage/application 페이지 기본 틀 구현 (FE-127) |
✅ | |
| 탭 구조 또는 구획 구분에 따라 UI 배치 완료 (FE-127) | ✅ | |
| 전체 섹션 구조 (질문 목록, 미리보기 등) 정리 (FE-127) | ✅ | |
| 질문 추가 삭제 기능 및 UI 추가 (FE-127) | ❓ | 질문 추가/삭제 기능의 구체적 구현이 코드에서 명확히 드러나지 않음 |
Assessment against linked issues: Out-of-scope changes
해당 변경사항 중 목표(issue)와 무관한 기능적 코드 변경은 발견되지 않았습니다.
Possibly related PRs
- Moadong/moadong#445: 기존
CreateForm컴포넌트 및 라우팅 구조 도입 PR로, 현재 PR의 컴포넌트 대체 및 구조 개선과 직접적으로 연관됨. - Moadong/moadong#450:
CreateForm및QuestionBuilder컴포넌트 타입 리팩토링 PR로, 본 PR과 타입 및 컴포넌트 관련 코드 변경에서 연관성 있음.
Suggested labels
🎨 Design
Suggested reviewers
- oesnuj
"""
✨ Finishing Touches
- 📝 Generate Docstrings
Thanks for using CodeRabbit! It's free for OSS, and your support helps us grow. If you like it, consider giving us a shout-out.
🪧 Tips
Chat
There are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:
- Review comments: Directly reply to a review comment made by CodeRabbit. Example:
I pushed a fix in commit <commit_id>, please review it.Explain this complex logic.Open a follow-up GitHub issue for this discussion.
- Files and specific lines of code (under the "Files changed" tab): Tag
@coderabbitaiin a new review comment at the desired location with your query. Examples:@coderabbitai explain this code block.@coderabbitai modularize this function.
- PR comments: Tag
@coderabbitaiin a new PR comment to ask questions about the PR branch. For the best results, please provide a very specific query, as very limited context is provided in this mode. Examples:@coderabbitai gather interesting stats about this repository and render them as a table. Additionally, render a pie chart showing the language distribution in the codebase.@coderabbitai read src/utils.ts and explain its main purpose.@coderabbitai read the files in the src/scheduler package and generate a class diagram using mermaid and a README in the markdown format.@coderabbitai help me debug CodeRabbit configuration file.
Support
Need help? Create a ticket on our support page for assistance with any issues or questions.
Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments.
CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)
@coderabbitai pauseto pause the reviews on a PR.@coderabbitai resumeto resume the paused reviews.@coderabbitai reviewto trigger an incremental review. This is useful when automatic reviews are disabled for the repository.@coderabbitai full reviewto do a full review from scratch and review all the files again.@coderabbitai summaryto regenerate the summary of the PR.@coderabbitai generate docstringsto generate docstrings for this PR.@coderabbitai generate sequence diagramto generate a sequence diagram of the changes in this PR.@coderabbitai resolveresolve all the CodeRabbit review comments.@coderabbitai configurationto show the current CodeRabbit configuration for the repository.@coderabbitai helpto get help.
Other keywords and placeholders
- Add
@coderabbitai ignoreanywhere in the PR description to prevent this PR from being reviewed. - Add
@coderabbitai summaryto generate the high-level summary at a specific location in the PR description. - Add
@coderabbitaianywhere in the PR title to generate the title automatically.
Documentation and Community
- Visit our Documentation for detailed information on how to use CodeRabbit.
- Join our Discord Community to get help, request features, and share feedback.
- Follow us on X/Twitter for updates and announcements.
Codecov ReportAttention: Patch coverage is 📢 Thoughts on this report? Let us know! |
![coderabbitai[bot]](https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/in/347564?s=60&v=4){kind=small}
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 1
🔭 Outside diff range comments (1)
frontend/src/mocks/data/mockData.ts (1)
29-92: 🛠️ Refactor suggestion질문 ID 일관성 문제 수정 필요
질문 ID가 일부만 순차적으로 변경되어 일관성이 부족합니다. 1-6번은 순차적이지만, 마지막 두 질문(105, 106번)은 여전히 비순차적입니다.
모든 질문 ID를 순차적으로 변경해주세요:
{ - id: 105, + id: 7, title: '전화번호 입력', description: '휴대전화 번호를 입력해주세요.', type: 'PHONE_NUMBER', options: { required: false, }, items: [{ value: '' }], }, { - id: 106, + id: 8, title: '이름 입력', description: '이름을 입력해주세요.', type: 'NAME', options: { required: true, }, items: [{ value: '' }], },
♻️ Duplicate comments (1)
frontend/src/pages/AdminPage/application/CreateApplicationForm.tsx (1)
108-108: 컴포넌트명 불일치 문제가 export에서도 나타납니다.앞서 언급한 컴포넌트명 수정과 함께 export 부분도 수정이 필요합니다.
🧹 Nitpick comments (3)
frontend/src/constants/INITIAL_FORM_DATA.ts (1)
3-22: 초기 폼 데이터 구조가 적절하게 정의되었습니다.
INITIAL_FORM_DATA상수는 새로운 지원서 생성 시 사용할 기본 구조를 잘 제공합니다. 다양한 질문 타입(SHORT_TEXT, CHOICE)의 예시가 포함되어 있고ApplicationFormData타입과 일치합니다.향후 개선 고려사항:
- 질문 ID를 하드코딩하는 대신 동적 생성 방식 검토
- CHOICE 타입 질문의 items에 placeholder 텍스트 추가로 사용자 경험 개선
frontend/src/pages/AdminPage/application/components/QuestionBuilder/QuestionBuilder.tsx (1)
45-45: LONG_TEXT 케이스 처리 개선 검토
LONG_TEXT타입이ShortText컴포넌트로 렌더링되고 있습니다. 장문형 텍스트의 경우 별도의 컴포넌트나 다른 UI가 필요할 수 있습니다.장문형 텍스트를 위한 별도의 컴포넌트 생성을 고려해보세요:
case 'LONG_TEXT': return ( <LongText id={id} title={title} required={options?.required} description={description} mode='builder' onTitleChange={onTitleChange} onDescriptionChange={onDescriptionChange} /> );frontend/src/pages/AdminPage/application/CreateApplicationForm.tsx (1)
39-46: 커링 패턴을 사용한 핸들러들입니다.현재 구현은 정확하지만, 매 렌더링마다 새로운 함수가 생성됩니다. 성능 최적화를 위해
useCallback사용을 고려해보세요.예시:
+import { useState, useCallback } from 'react'; -const handleTitleChange = (id: number) => (value: string) => - updateQuestionField(id, 'title', value); +const handleTitleChange = useCallback( + (id: number) => (value: string) => updateQuestionField(id, 'title', value), + [] +);
📜 Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro
📒 Files selected for processing (10)
frontend/src/App.tsx(2 hunks)frontend/src/constants/INITIAL_FORM_DATA.ts(1 hunks)frontend/src/mocks/api/apply.ts(1 hunks)frontend/src/mocks/data/mockData.ts(7 hunks)frontend/src/pages/AdminPage/application/CreateApplicationForm.styles.ts(1 hunks)frontend/src/pages/AdminPage/application/CreateApplicationForm.tsx(1 hunks)frontend/src/pages/AdminPage/application/CreateForm.tsx(0 hunks)frontend/src/pages/AdminPage/application/components/QuestionBuilder/QuestionBuilder.styles.ts(1 hunks)frontend/src/pages/AdminPage/application/components/QuestionBuilder/QuestionBuilder.tsx(4 hunks)frontend/src/types/application.ts(2 hunks)
💤 Files with no reviewable changes (1)
- frontend/src/pages/AdminPage/application/CreateForm.tsx
🧰 Additional context used
🧬 Code Graph Analysis (4)
frontend/src/mocks/api/apply.ts (1)
frontend/src/mocks/data/mockData.ts (1)
mockData(25-122)
frontend/src/constants/INITIAL_FORM_DATA.ts (1)
frontend/src/types/application.ts (1)
ApplicationFormData(55-58)
frontend/src/mocks/data/mockData.ts (1)
frontend/src/types/application.ts (1)
ApplicationFormData(55-58)
frontend/src/pages/AdminPage/application/components/QuestionBuilder/QuestionBuilder.tsx (1)
frontend/src/types/application.ts (2)
QUESTION_TYPE_LIST(3-11)QuestionType(13-13)
🔇 Additional comments (22)
frontend/src/pages/AdminPage/application/components/QuestionBuilder/QuestionBuilder.styles.ts (1)
10-12: 새로운 컨테이너 스타일 컴포넌트가 적절하게 추가되었습니다.
QuestionFieldContainer는 질문 필드를 감싸는 컨테이너로서 적절한 스타일링(width: 100%)을 가지고 있으며, 기존 스타일 컴포넌트들과 일관된 패턴을 유지하고 있습니다.frontend/src/App.tsx (2)
18-18: 컴포넌트 이름이 더 명확하게 변경되었습니다.
CreateForm에서CreateApplicationForm으로의 변경은 컴포넌트의 목적을 더 구체적으로 나타내며, 지원서 작성 기능임을 명확히 표현합니다.
76-79: 라우트 설정이 올바르게 업데이트되었습니다.import 변경과 일관되게 JSX 엘리먼트도
CreateApplicationForm으로 정확히 업데이트되었습니다.frontend/src/mocks/api/apply.ts (1)
28-28: 속성명 불일치 문제가 올바르게 수정되었습니다.
mockData.title에서mockData.form_title로 변경하여 목 데이터의 실제 속성명과 일치시켰습니다. 이는frontend/src/mocks/data/mockData.ts에서 정의된ApplicationFormData타입의form_title속성과 일관성을 유지합니다.frontend/src/constants/INITIAL_FORM_DATA.ts (2)
19-19: 선택 질문의 초기값이 사용자 친화적으로 설정되었습니다.CHOICE 타입 질문에 두 개의 빈 옵션을 제공하여 사용자가 바로 편집할 수 있도록 구성했습니다.
24-24: 적절한 export 패턴을 사용했습니다.default export를 사용하여 상수를 명확하게 내보내고 있습니다.
frontend/src/mocks/data/mockData.ts (2)
1-1: 타입 안전성 개선을 위한 import 변경 승인
ApplicationFormData타입을 사용하여 타입 안전성이 개선되었습니다.
25-26: form_title 필드명 변경 승인일관성 있는 네이밍을 위해
title을form_title로 변경한 것이 적절합니다.frontend/src/pages/AdminPage/application/components/QuestionBuilder/QuestionBuilder.tsx (3)
8-8: 중앙화된 상수 import 승인
QUESTION_TYPE_LIST상수를 사용하여 타입 관리가 중앙화되었습니다.
23-25: 타입 검증 로직 추가 승인지원되지 않는 질문 타입에 대한 early return 로직이 추가되어 안전성이 향상되었습니다.
133-135: 컨테이너 래핑 승인
QuestionFieldContainer로 래핑하여 일관된 스타일링이 적용되었습니다.frontend/src/pages/AdminPage/application/CreateApplicationForm.styles.ts (2)
3-18: FormTitle 스타일링 승인폼 제목을 위한 깔끔한 스타일링이 적용되었습니다. 특히 포커스 시 placeholder가 페이드아웃되는 효과가 좋습니다.
20-24: QuestionContainer 레이아웃 승인질문들을 세로로 배치하고 적절한 간격(83px)을 제공하는 레이아웃이 잘 구성되었습니다.
frontend/src/types/application.ts (3)
3-11: 중앙화된 질문 타입 상수 추가 승인
QUESTION_TYPE_LIST상수를 통해 질문 타입이 중앙화되어 유지보수성이 향상되었습니다.
13-13: 타입 파생 방식 개선 승인
typeof과 인덱스 접근을 사용한 타입 파생 방식으로 타입 안전성이 향상되었습니다.
55-58: ApplicationFormData 인터페이스 추가 승인폼 데이터 구조를 명확히 정의한 인터페이스가 잘 작성되었습니다.
form_title필드명도 명확합니다.frontend/src/pages/AdminPage/application/CreateApplicationForm.tsx (6)
1-13: 임포트 구조가 깔끔하게 정리되어 있습니다.필요한 의존성들이 모두 적절히 임포트되어 있고, TODO 주석으로 향후 개발 계획을 명시한 것도 좋습니다.
19-30: 제네릭을 활용한 타입 안전한 업데이트 함수입니다.제네릭
<K extends keyof Question>을 사용하여 컴파일 타임에 타입 안전성을 보장하고, 불변성을 유지하면서 상태를 업데이트하는 깔끔한 구현입니다.
32-37: 간단하고 명확한 폼 제목 업데이트 핸들러입니다.
form_title필드명 변경사항이 적절히 반영되어 있고, 구현이 정확합니다.
48-65: 선택형 질문의 items 배열을 적절히 처리하는 복잡한 로직입니다.질문 타입 변경 시 선택형(
CHOICE,MULTI_CHOICE)일 때만 items 배열을 관리하고, 최소 2개 항목을 보장하는 로직이 잘 구현되어 있습니다. 기존 items가 있으면 유지하는 것도 좋은 UX입니다.
67-74: 중첩된 options 객체를 적절히 업데이트하는 핸들러입니다.
options.required필드를 업데이트할 때 기존options객체를 스프레드하여 불변성을 유지하는 구현이 정확합니다.
76-106: 깔끔한 렌더링 구조와 적절한 props 전달입니다.
PageContainer로 레이아웃을 감싸고 스타일드 컴포넌트를 활용한 구조가 좋습니다.map을 사용하여 질문들을 렌더링하면서QuestionBuilder에 필요한 모든 props를 적절히 전달하고 있습니다.key로question.id를 사용하는 것도 올바른 접근입니다.
frontend/src/pages/AdminPage/application/CreateApplicationForm.tsx
Outdated
Show resolved
Hide resolved
Co-Authored-By: 김준서 Junseo Kim <semiwest2@gmail.com>
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 0
🧹 Nitpick comments (4)
frontend/src/pages/AdminPage/application/CreateApplicationForm.tsx (4)
3-3: TODO 코멘트 추적을 위한 이슈 생성을 고려해보세요.질문 삭제 및 추가 기능이 아직 구현되지 않았습니다. 이러한 핵심 기능들을 체계적으로 추적하기 위해 별도 이슈를 생성하는 것을 권장합니다.
이 TODO 항목들을 위한 이슈를 생성하거나 구현 계획을 도와드릴까요?
39-46: 핸들러 최적화를 고려해보세요.현재 핸들러들이 컴포넌트 렌더링마다 새로 생성됩니다. 성능 최적화를 위해
useCallback을 사용하는 것을 고려해보세요.+import { useState, useCallback } from 'react'; -const handleTitleChange = (id: number) => (value: string) => - updateQuestionField(id, 'title', value); +const handleTitleChange = useCallback((id: number) => (value: string) => + updateQuestionField(id, 'title', value), []); -const handleDescriptionChange = (id: number) => (value: string) => - updateQuestionField(id, 'description', value); +const handleDescriptionChange = useCallback((id: number) => (value: string) => + updateQuestionField(id, 'description', value), []); -const handleItemsChange = (id: number) => (items: { value: string }[]) => - updateQuestionField(id, 'items', items); +const handleItemsChange = useCallback((id: number) => (items: { value: string }[]) => + updateQuestionField(id, 'items', items), []);🧰 Tools
🪛 GitHub Check: codecov/patch
[warning] 39-40: frontend/src/pages/AdminPage/application/CreateApplicationForm.tsx#L39-L40
Added lines #L39 - L40 were not covered by tests
[warning] 42-43: frontend/src/pages/AdminPage/application/CreateApplicationForm.tsx#L42-L43
Added lines #L42 - L43 were not covered by tests
[warning] 45-46: frontend/src/pages/AdminPage/application/CreateApplicationForm.tsx#L45-L46
Added lines #L45 - L46 were not covered by tests
48-65: 타입 변경 로직의 복잡성을 개선할 수 있습니다.현재 로직은 정확하지만 가독성 향상을 위해 리팩토링을 고려해보세요.
const handleTypeChange = (id: number) => (newType: QuestionType) => { + const isChoiceType = newType === 'CHOICE' || newType === 'MULTI_CHOICE'; + const getDefaultItems = (currentItems: { value: string }[] | undefined) => { + if (!isChoiceType) return undefined; + return currentItems && currentItems.length >= 2 + ? currentItems + : [{ value: '' }, { value: '' }]; + }; + setFormData((prev) => ({ ...prev, questions: prev.questions.map((q) => { if (q.id !== id) return q; - const isChoice = newType === 'CHOICE' || newType === 'MULTI_CHOICE'; return { ...q, type: newType, - items: isChoice - ? q.items && q.items.length >= 2 - ? q.items - : [{ value: '' }, { value: '' }] - : undefined, + items: getDefaultItems(q.items), }; }), })); };🧰 Tools
🪛 GitHub Check: codecov/patch
[warning] 48-49: frontend/src/pages/AdminPage/application/CreateApplicationForm.tsx#L48-L49
Added lines #L48 - L49 were not covered by tests
[warning] 54-54: frontend/src/pages/AdminPage/application/CreateApplicationForm.tsx#L54
Added line #L54 was not covered by tests
1-109: 테스트 커버리지 개선이 필요합니다.정적 분석에서 지적한 대로 새로운 컴포넌트에 대한 테스트 커버리지가 부족합니다. 핵심 기능들에 대한 단위 테스트 작성을 권장합니다.
이 컴포넌트의 주요 기능들(상태 업데이트, 핸들러 동작 등)에 대한 테스트 코드 작성을 도와드릴까요?
🧰 Tools
🪛 GitHub Check: codecov/patch
[warning] 4-5: frontend/src/pages/AdminPage/application/CreateApplicationForm.tsx#L4-L5
Added lines #L4 - L5 were not covered by tests
[warning] 8-8: frontend/src/pages/AdminPage/application/CreateApplicationForm.tsx#L8
Added line #L8 was not covered by tests
[warning] 10-12: frontend/src/pages/AdminPage/application/CreateApplicationForm.tsx#L10-L12
Added lines #L10 - L12 were not covered by tests
[warning] 14-15: frontend/src/pages/AdminPage/application/CreateApplicationForm.tsx#L14-L15
Added lines #L14 - L15 were not covered by tests
[warning] 19-19: frontend/src/pages/AdminPage/application/CreateApplicationForm.tsx#L19
Added line #L19 was not covered by tests
[warning] 24-24: frontend/src/pages/AdminPage/application/CreateApplicationForm.tsx#L24
Added line #L24 was not covered by tests
[warning] 32-33: frontend/src/pages/AdminPage/application/CreateApplicationForm.tsx#L32-L33
Added lines #L32 - L33 were not covered by tests
[warning] 39-40: frontend/src/pages/AdminPage/application/CreateApplicationForm.tsx#L39-L40
Added lines #L39 - L40 were not covered by tests
[warning] 42-43: frontend/src/pages/AdminPage/application/CreateApplicationForm.tsx#L42-L43
Added lines #L42 - L43 were not covered by tests
[warning] 45-46: frontend/src/pages/AdminPage/application/CreateApplicationForm.tsx#L45-L46
Added lines #L45 - L46 were not covered by tests
[warning] 48-49: frontend/src/pages/AdminPage/application/CreateApplicationForm.tsx#L48-L49
Added lines #L48 - L49 were not covered by tests
[warning] 54-54: frontend/src/pages/AdminPage/application/CreateApplicationForm.tsx#L54
Added line #L54 was not covered by tests
[warning] 67-68: frontend/src/pages/AdminPage/application/CreateApplicationForm.tsx#L67-L68
Added lines #L67 - L68 were not covered by tests
[warning] 76-76: frontend/src/pages/AdminPage/application/CreateApplicationForm.tsx#L76
Added line #L76 was not covered by tests
[warning] 82-82: frontend/src/pages/AdminPage/application/CreateApplicationForm.tsx#L82
Added line #L82 was not covered by tests
[warning] 87-87: frontend/src/pages/AdminPage/application/CreateApplicationForm.tsx#L87
Added line #L87 was not covered by tests
[warning] 108-108: frontend/src/pages/AdminPage/application/CreateApplicationForm.tsx#L108
Added line #L108 was not covered by tests
📜 Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro
📒 Files selected for processing (1)
frontend/src/pages/AdminPage/application/CreateApplicationForm.tsx(1 hunks)
🧰 Additional context used
🪛 GitHub Check: codecov/patch
frontend/src/pages/AdminPage/application/CreateApplicationForm.tsx
[warning] 4-5: frontend/src/pages/AdminPage/application/CreateApplicationForm.tsx#L4-L5
Added lines #L4 - L5 were not covered by tests
[warning] 8-8: frontend/src/pages/AdminPage/application/CreateApplicationForm.tsx#L8
Added line #L8 was not covered by tests
[warning] 10-12: frontend/src/pages/AdminPage/application/CreateApplicationForm.tsx#L10-L12
Added lines #L10 - L12 were not covered by tests
[warning] 14-15: frontend/src/pages/AdminPage/application/CreateApplicationForm.tsx#L14-L15
Added lines #L14 - L15 were not covered by tests
[warning] 19-19: frontend/src/pages/AdminPage/application/CreateApplicationForm.tsx#L19
Added line #L19 was not covered by tests
[warning] 24-24: frontend/src/pages/AdminPage/application/CreateApplicationForm.tsx#L24
Added line #L24 was not covered by tests
[warning] 32-33: frontend/src/pages/AdminPage/application/CreateApplicationForm.tsx#L32-L33
Added lines #L32 - L33 were not covered by tests
[warning] 39-40: frontend/src/pages/AdminPage/application/CreateApplicationForm.tsx#L39-L40
Added lines #L39 - L40 were not covered by tests
[warning] 42-43: frontend/src/pages/AdminPage/application/CreateApplicationForm.tsx#L42-L43
Added lines #L42 - L43 were not covered by tests
[warning] 45-46: frontend/src/pages/AdminPage/application/CreateApplicationForm.tsx#L45-L46
Added lines #L45 - L46 were not covered by tests
[warning] 48-49: frontend/src/pages/AdminPage/application/CreateApplicationForm.tsx#L48-L49
Added lines #L48 - L49 were not covered by tests
[warning] 54-54: frontend/src/pages/AdminPage/application/CreateApplicationForm.tsx#L54
Added line #L54 was not covered by tests
[warning] 67-68: frontend/src/pages/AdminPage/application/CreateApplicationForm.tsx#L67-L68
Added lines #L67 - L68 were not covered by tests
[warning] 76-76: frontend/src/pages/AdminPage/application/CreateApplicationForm.tsx#L76
Added line #L76 was not covered by tests
[warning] 82-82: frontend/src/pages/AdminPage/application/CreateApplicationForm.tsx#L82
Added line #L82 was not covered by tests
[warning] 87-87: frontend/src/pages/AdminPage/application/CreateApplicationForm.tsx#L87
Added line #L87 was not covered by tests
[warning] 108-108: frontend/src/pages/AdminPage/application/CreateApplicationForm.tsx#L108
Added line #L108 was not covered by tests
🔇 Additional comments (4)
frontend/src/pages/AdminPage/application/CreateApplicationForm.tsx (4)
15-17: 상태 초기화 로직이 잘 구현되었습니다.mock 데이터가 있으면 사용하고, 없으면 INITIAL_FORM_DATA로 폴백하는 로직이 적절합니다. nullish coalescing 연산자 사용도 좋습니다.
19-30: 타입 안전한 제네릭 함수가 잘 구현되었습니다.
updateQuestionField함수는 제네릭을 활용하여 타입 안전성을 보장하면서도 재사용 가능한 유틸리티 함수로 잘 설계되었습니다.🧰 Tools
🪛 GitHub Check: codecov/patch
[warning] 19-19: frontend/src/pages/AdminPage/application/CreateApplicationForm.tsx#L19
Added line #L19 was not covered by tests
[warning] 24-24: frontend/src/pages/AdminPage/application/CreateApplicationForm.tsx#L24
Added line #L24 was not covered by tests
76-105: 렌더링 로직이 잘 구조화되어 있습니다.컴포넌트 구조가 명확하고 props 전달도 적절합니다. QuestionBuilder 컴포넌트에 필요한 모든 데이터와 핸들러를 올바르게 전달하고 있습니다.
🧰 Tools
🪛 GitHub Check: codecov/patch
[warning] 76-76: frontend/src/pages/AdminPage/application/CreateApplicationForm.tsx#L76
Added line #L76 was not covered by tests
[warning] 82-82: frontend/src/pages/AdminPage/application/CreateApplicationForm.tsx#L82
Added line #L82 was not covered by tests
[warning] 87-87: frontend/src/pages/AdminPage/application/CreateApplicationForm.tsx#L87
Added line #L87 was not covered by tests
67-74:Details
❌ Incorrect review comment
옵션 객체 안전성을 검증해보세요.
q.options이 undefined일 가능성을 고려하여 안전한 접근을 보장해야 합니다.다음 스크립트로 Question 타입의 options 필드가 optional인지 확인해보겠습니다:
🏁 Script executed:
#!/bin/bash # Question 타입에서 options 필드가 optional인지 확인 ast-grep --pattern 'interface Question { $$$ options$_: $$$ }'Length of output: 68
다음 스크립트를 실행하여
Question타입 정의와options필드의 optional 여부를 확인해 주세요:
🏁 Script executed:
#!/bin/bash # Question 타입 정의와 options 필드 확인 rg -n "interface Question" -A 10Length of output: 6197
불필요한 안전성 검증 제안입니다.
frontend/src/types/application.ts와frontend/src/mocks/data/mockData.ts에서Question.options필드는 옵셔널이 아닌 필수 필드로 정의되어 있어(options: { required: boolean }), 런타임에undefined가 될 일이 없습니다. 해당 접근은 안전하며 추가 검증은 불필요합니다.Likely an incorrect or invalid review comment.
🧰 Tools
🪛 GitHub Check: codecov/patch
[warning] 67-68: frontend/src/pages/AdminPage/application/CreateApplicationForm.tsx#L67-L68
Added lines #L67 - L68 were not covered by tests
2 participants
#️⃣연관된 이슈
📝작업 내용
추가된 것
updateQuestionField함수 추가QuestionContainer추가변경사항
중점적으로 리뷰받고 싶은 부분(선택)
논의하고 싶은 부분(선택)
🫡 참고사항
Summary by CodeRabbit
신규 기능
버그 수정
리팩터링
스타일