-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 12
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Allows multiple versions of the Information Model (IM) to be validate… #312
Conversation
…d in the same run and optionally report a warning in the report 1. Added resource github188 to src/test/resources 2. Added resource github210 to src/test/resources 3. Add new class to keep a list of unique IMs processed in LabelUtil.java 4. Add logic to register IM version for each label to LocationUtil.java and many debugs to find the bug in LabelValidator.java 5. Fix bug by setting schemaLocation for each label to allow multiple versions of the IM to be processed in LabelValidationRule.java 6. Consolidate long functions into shorter functions for readability in LabelValidationRule.java 7. Add debug logging to SchemaValidator.java 8. Add logic to report warning if requested for labels processed if multiple versions of IM processed in ValidateLauncher.java 9. Add new parameter PREFER_ALL_LABELS_SAME_INFORMATION_MODEL_VERSION to ConfigKey.java 10. Add new parameter PREFER_ALL_LABELS_SAME_INFORMATION_MODEL_VERSION to Flag.java 11. Add new parameter PREFER_ALL_LABELS_SAME_INFORMATION_MODEL_VERSION to FlagOptions.java 12. Add github188 and github210 tests to feature file validate.feature Refs: #188 As a user, I want to validate a bundle that uses multiple versions of the Information Model / Discipline LDDs #210 As a user, I want validate to raise a WARNING when differing versions of IM are used within a bundle
@qchaupds apologies for the confusion. we want this WARNING to show all of the time. there does not need to be a flag. |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
for #210, per #312 (comment), there should not be flag. instead we should always throw a WARNING.
for #188, this looks great. but does this test case actually add any value?
validate --skip-content-validation \
-r report_github188_label_valid_both_with_non_existent_file.json
-s json
-t src/test/resources/github188/bundle_cassini-huygens-coradar.xml
src/test/resources/github188/this_file_does_not_exist.xml
if not, if it is difficult to come up with a good failure test case, you can skip it. we want to try wherever it makes sense, but we don't want to do it just for the sake of doing it.
…back because report of WARNING is now default 1. Remove references to optional flag to report WARNING for multiple IM version in ConfigKey.java 2. Remove references to optional flag to report WARNING for multiple IM version in Flag.java 3. Remove references to optional flag to report WARNING for multiple IM version in FlagOptions.java 4. Modify failed test cases due to the WARNING messages are now automatic from feature file validate.feature 5. Remove some tests that are not as useful from feature file validate.feature Refs: #188 As a user, I want to validate a bundle that uses multiple versions of the Information Model / Discipline LDDs #210 As a user, I want validate to raise a WARNING when differing versions of IM are used within a bundle
…d in the same run and optionally report a warning in the report
Closes #188
Closes #210
This pull request resolves two issues: bug occurred when multiple IM versions are used in the labels and to optionally allows the user to get a WARNING
message of multiple versions of IM are used in a bundle. The additional flag is provided for #210: --prefer-all-labels-same-information-model-version
Tested in DEV for #188:
Previously, the user reported the following two labels below did not pass, now it does.
% validate --skip-content-validation -r report_github188_label_valid_both.json -s json -t src/test/resources/github188/bundle_cassini-huygens-coradar.xml src/test/resources/github188/BILQH07S314_D065_T008S02_V02_without_Missing_Area_tag.xml
This test below should not pass for the 2nd label since it does not exist.
validate --skip-content-validation -r report_github188_label_valid_both_with_non_existent_file.json -s json -t src/test/resources/github188/bundle_cassini-huygens-coradar.xml src/test/resources/github188/this_file_does_not_exist.xml
Tested in DEV for #210:
This test will get a WARNING in the report:
% validate --prefer-all-labels-same-information-model-version --skip-content-validation -r report_github210_label_valid_both_with_warning.json
-s json -t src/test/resources/github210/bundle_cassini-huygens-coradar.xml src/test/resources/github210/BILQH07S314_D065_T008S02_V02_without_Missing_Area_tag.xml
This test will not get a WARNING in the report (This is the default mode for validate):
% validate --skip-content-validation -r report_github210_label_valid_both_without_warning.json -s json -t src/test/resources/github210/bundle_cassini-huygens-coradar.xml
src/test/resources/github210/BILQH07S314_D065_T008S02_V02_without_Missing_Area_tag.xml