-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 146
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Improvements to radiation code #514
Merged
Merged
Changes from 9 commits
Commits
Show all changes
12 commits
Select commit
Hold shift + click to select a range
dc843a5
Initial commit
dustinswales e23d4a8
Use common cloud-overlap routines in RRTMG
dustinswales a8cc769
Remove distinct lw/sw cloud-overlap options in RRTMG.
dustinswales b145f63
Remove distinct lw/sw cloud-overlap options in RRTMGP.
dustinswales ae2472f
New cloud-overlap assumptions in RRTMGP. Replaced magic numbers with …
dustinswales 01ad186
Removed instanced of physparam in RRTMGP scheme. Information passed d…
dustinswales 573d922
Assumulated changes. Cleanup GP setup module, remove GP dependecies o…
dustinswales 7e88b16
Merge branch 'master' of https://github.com/NCAR/ccpp-physics into ma…
dustinswales 0d22b36
Synced with NCAR master
dustinswales 7cef35e
Removed redundant importing of kind_phys
dustinswales 53619d8
add units to index_for_diagnostic_printout metadata
dustinswales 0ecf50b
Bugfix in GP sampling routines.
dustinswales File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
There are no files selected for viewing
Large diffs are not rendered by default.
Oops, something went wrong.
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Oops, something went wrong.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Why remove this generality?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
@SMoorthi-emc It was decided that we didn't need this ability.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Does this meaning the sw and lw will always be called in same frequency?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
This switch is not about frequency, but about the choice of cloud overlap method. The change that the radiation groups (who was involved, @dustinswales ?) agreed on means that the same cloud overlap method is used for both LW and SW radiation. Makes a lot of sense to me, not sure how physical it would be to use different methods between them.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
This was discussed with @Qingfu-Liu @lisa-bengtsson @dustinswales @mjiacono Bao and Pincus in early October. The radiation developers recommended using the same cloud overlap for SW and LW because it is unphysical to assume otherwise. Also, @qingfu mentioned that the operational models at NCEP also use the same cloud overlap for SW and LW, so it was understood that the generality was not necessary.