Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Autocomplete should be able to support concept scheme/group information #1335

Closed
kouralex opened this issue Jun 8, 2022 · 1 comment · Fixed by #1380
Closed

Autocomplete should be able to support concept scheme/group information #1335

kouralex opened this issue Jun 8, 2022 · 1 comment · Fixed by #1380

Comments

@kouralex
Copy link
Contributor

kouralex commented Jun 8, 2022

At which URL did you encounter the problem?

https://dev.finto.fi/mts/fi/page/m3547

What steps will reproduce the problem?

  1. Go to the URL above (or any URL under the MTS vocabulary)
  2. Search for (in Finnish) "opettaja" and wait for the autocomplete to return results

What is the expected output? What do you see instead?

See image below. I see multiple "opettaja" search results accompanied with their alternative label presentations. Even though it is a bit problematic to have same preferred labels (there is a reason for them in this vocabulary), the persistent issue here is that one cannot visually distinguish between the preferred label hits. I'd expect to be able to add a vocabulary-wide configuration setting that would enable me to see, e.g., the closest group(s) after the autocompleted search result in (in addition to the "Käsite" type information!). In some other vocabulary it could include concept scheme(s) [to which the concept the concept belongs to], for instance.
opettaja

@kouralex kouralex added this to the Next Tasks milestone Jun 8, 2022
@kouralex
Copy link
Contributor Author

kouralex commented Jun 8, 2022

It just came to my mind that one solution could be that the setting takes in the required (unprefixed) SPARQL property path (as a string). However, if this solution is to be applied one would miss the opportunity to query for anything fancier.

kouralex added a commit that referenced this issue Oct 18, 2022

Verified

This commit was signed with the committer’s verified signature. The key has expired.
…red labels; fixes #1335
@osma osma closed this as completed in #1380 Nov 1, 2023
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging a pull request may close this issue.

1 participant