-
-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 14.3k
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
kernel: fix passthru.tests #247520
Merged
Merged
kernel: fix passthru.tests #247520
Changes from all commits
Commits
Show all changes
2 commits
Select commit
Hold shift + click to select a range
File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
There are no files selected for viewing
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
iirc this code is used by both
release.nix
andnixosTests
, and it has to deal with all tests, which are still written in a number of styles.So this is hard to review; can't really tell the implications without a lot of manual testing.
In my opinion
release.nix
should be rewritten to follow the more easily understood structure ofnixosTests
, but until that's done, we need to consider that both code paths used this ill-conceived semi-generic code.All that aside, we should really try to avoid the proliferation of the term "passthru". Unfortunately it's the mechanism we have to use with
mkDerivation
, but it is by itself meaningless, and its presence in the package attribute set is an implementation detail. So if we're going to accept a fix for the problem it would be great for it not to use thepassthru
attribute.As for rewriting
release.nix
, ideally we'd have something like #176557 which has a nice and general solution for this particular problem of overriding a test to use a specific package. But the actual implementation was a bit messy, which is why I think it should be rewritten. It would probably still resemble the documented example.There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I agree this isn't a great solution. It's really more of a workaround and I don't like adding special cases like this but I don't really see another way without refactoring the entire tests infrastructure which I don't feel comfortable doing and even you doing it would take quite some time (see #176557).
By using "passthru" as the special attribute's name, I hope to make it somewhat clear that it's intended for passing through values rather than exposing tests. Do you have a better name for it?
All this should change is that anything organised under a
passthru
isn't discovered as a test. My hope is that no Nixpkgs contributor, knowing the meaning of passthru in mkDerivation, would organise an actual test under "passthru", only values for, well, passing through.