python311Packages.xnd: fix python311 build with upstream patch

[ghost]

Fix renamed functions and moved header file. package builds and unit tests pass. Patch submitted and merged upstream as
https://github.com/xnd-project/xnd/pull/48

ZHF #265948
https://hydra.nixos.org/build/239056417
Result of nixpkgs-review pr 268058 run on x86_64-linux 1

8 packages built:

• python310Packages.gumath
• python310Packages.gumath.dist
• python310Packages.xnd
• python310Packages.xnd.dist
• python311Packages.gumath
• python311Packages.gumath.dist
• python311Packages.xnd
• python311Packages.xnd.dist

Description of changes

Things done

• Built on platform(s)
  • x86_64-linux
  • aarch64-linux
  • x86_64-darwin
  • aarch64-darwin
• For non-Linux: Is sandboxing enabled in nix.conf? (See Nix manual)
  • sandbox = relaxed
  • sandbox = true
• Tested, as applicable:
  • NixOS test(s) (look inside nixos/tests)
  • and/or package tests
  • or, for functions and "core" functionality, tests in lib/tests or pkgs/test
  • made sure NixOS tests are linked to the relevant packages
• Tested compilation of all packages that depend on this change using nix-shell -p nixpkgs-review --run "nixpkgs-review rev HEAD". Note: all changes have to be committed, also see nixpkgs-review usage
• Tested basic functionality of all binary files (usually in ./result/bin/)
• 23.11 Release Notes (or backporting 23.05 Release notes)
  • (Package updates) Added a release notes entry if the change is major or breaking
  • (Module updates) Added a release notes entry if the change is significant
  • (Module addition) Added a release notes entry if adding a new NixOS module
• Fits CONTRIBUTING.md.

[risicle]

Nicely done. nixpkgs-review happy, nixos x86_64 & aarch64-linux. Ofborg shows success on macos.

[pbsds]

The package itself seems to build and run fine, but i cannot create a python environment with it. This is my tests in nixpkgs-review:

$ nix-shell -I nixpkgs=nixpkgs/ -p 'python311.withPackages (ps: [ ps.xnd ps.pdoc ])' --run 'pdoc xnd'
error: collision between `/nix/store/zqwgj0cwr7ssi3jqh3jhbbsjv1kadmvf-python3.11-ndtypes-unstable-2019-08-01/include/docstrings.h' and `/nix/store/cvcwci3iplx07ln9k288ddaw7px29r23-python3.11-xnd-unstable-2019-08-01/include/docstrings.h'

I'd like to move the header into the dev output, but creating it will pull with it the propagated inputs, so i am at a loss.

It seems this just got merged as i am writing this, so i'll look into it myself

[ghost]

The package itself seems to build and run fine, but i cannot create a python environment with it. This is my tests in nixpkgs-review:

$ nix-shell -I nixpkgs=nixpkgs/ -p 'python311.withPackages (ps: [ ps.xnd ps.pdoc ])' --run 'pdoc xnd'
error: collision between `/nix/store/zqwgj0cwr7ssi3jqh3jhbbsjv1kadmvf-python3.11-ndtypes-unstable-2019-08-01/include/docstrings.h' and `/nix/store/cvcwci3iplx07ln9k288ddaw7px29r23-python3.11-xnd-unstable-2019-08-01/include/docstrings.h'

I'd like to move the header into the dev output, but creating it will pull with it the propagated inputs, so i am at a loss.

It seems this just got merged as i am writing this, so i'll look into it myself

hmm. ndtypes and xnd are part of the same xnd-project ecosystem. this collision seems like it's been an issue since they were added in 2018. i am a little cloudy on the differences of out, lib, dev -- would have to grep around a little to see how to prevent the propogatedBuildInputs from going in dev -- i assume that dev should just contain headers?

[pbsds]

Generally libraries goes in lib, and built-time headers go in dev. I'm working on a PR which should fix it. It is intentional that propagated inputs go to dev, but this has an effect on the end user trying to make a shell with python packages, since then the dev output is not neccesarily fetched.

UPDATE: #268337