-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 17
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
merge_cubes: resample implicitly #402
Comments
This feature could also be considered for the |
m-mohr
added a commit
that referenced
this issue
Feb 3, 2023
…be resampled implicitly instead of throwing an error. #402
m-mohr
added a commit
that referenced
this issue
Feb 3, 2023
…be resampled implicitly instead of throwing an error. #402
m-mohr
added a commit
that referenced
this issue
Mar 14, 2023
…clarifications (#405) * `mask` and `merge_cubes`: The spatial dimensions `x` and `y` can now be resampled implicitly instead of throwing an error. #402 * Clarify descriptions #379 * Improve wording as suggested by @soxofaan * Update merge_cubes.json * Slim down description * Default parameters of resample_cube_spatial apply
This was referenced May 4, 2023
Merged
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Process ID: merge_cubes
Describe the issue:
@jdries wrote at https://discuss.eodc.eu/t/terrascope-backend-upgrade/542:
This is not ideal wrt reproducibility, I think. Different back-ends behave differently then.
It's non breaking as it purely adds behavior for what before just threw an error.
Proposed solution:
We discussed this in the PSC and it seems reasonable here to be user-friendly and implicitly add the resampling to the merge_cubes process in general. It would be described just as an implicit call to
resample_cube_spatial
where the first cube is always the baseline.The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: