Skip to content
This repository has been archived by the owner on Mar 28, 2024. It is now read-only.

Implement different way to associate service points to entitlements #83

Closed
jeremi opened this issue Jun 22, 2023 · 7 comments · Fixed by #110
Closed

Implement different way to associate service points to entitlements #83

jeremi opened this issue Jun 22, 2023 · 7 comments · Fixed by #110
Assignees

Comments

@jeremi
Copy link
Member

jeremi commented Jun 22, 2023

When a program is created, we need to be able to define how an entitlement is associated with a service point, if necessary.

For clarifications:

  • Link service points to registrants - add a field in the registrant model to identify the assigned service point.
  • Copy the service point assigned to the registrant when generating entitlements
@dasunhegoda
Copy link

  • The service points will be at the program-level
  • The service points can be a top-up retailer

@gonzalesedwin1123
Copy link
Member

gonzalesedwin1123 commented Jul 12, 2023

Is this an ACF specific feature @jeremi @dasunhegoda ?

@dasunhegoda
Copy link

At 1st, it's ACF specific, then to general OpenSPP if suitable.

@gonzalesedwin1123
Copy link
Member

Currently, this only provides a way to specify if service points with disabled and inactive contracts can be added to entitlements during generation.

@dasunhegoda
Copy link

Hi @jeremi

  1. Could you please elaborate more on the different approaches we should take?
  2. Do we need a config to associate service points differently?

@adriancris
Copy link

QA Passed
Working as expected

@adriancris
Copy link

tested and approved without comments

Sign up for free to subscribe to this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in.
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging a pull request may close this issue.

5 participants