-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 1
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Update imports #4
Conversation
Warning Rate limit exceeded@JarbasAl has exceeded the limit for the number of commits or files that can be reviewed per hour. Please wait 4 minutes and 22 seconds before requesting another review. How to resolve this issue?After the wait time has elapsed, a review can be triggered using the We recommend that you space out your commits to avoid hitting the rate limit. How do rate limits work?CodeRabbit enforces hourly rate limits for each developer per organization. Our paid plans have higher rate limits than the trial, open-source and free plans. In all cases, we re-allow further reviews after a brief timeout. Please see our FAQ for further information. WalkthroughA set of new GitHub Actions workflows has been introduced to automate various aspects of the software development lifecycle, including license compliance checks, release proposals, alpha version publishing, stable release publishing, and unit testing. Additionally, updates have been made to the Changes
Poem
Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media? TipsChatThere are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:
Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments. CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)
Other keywords and placeholders
CodeRabbit Configuration File (
|
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Actionable comments posted: 1
Outside diff range, codebase verification and nitpick comments (2)
.github/workflows/publish_release.yml (1)
3-13
: Critical Issue: Referenced Workflow File Does Not ExistThe workflow in
.github/workflows/publish_release.yml
references a non-existent file.github/workflows/publish_stable_release.yml
. This will cause the workflow to fail. Please ensure that the referenced file is created or update the reference to point to an existing, valid workflow.
- File Missing:
.github/workflows/publish_stable_release.yml
Analysis chain
Workflow setup looks good; verify the referenced workflow.
The setup of this workflow is standard and appropriate for publishing releases. However, ensure that the referenced workflow (
publish_stable_release.yml
) is stable and well-maintained to avoid disruptions.Run the following script to verify the stability and updates of the referenced workflow:
Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Check the commit history of the referenced workflow to ensure it is stable. # Test: Search for recent commits to the referenced workflow. Expect: No frequent or breaking changes. git log --since="6 months ago" -- .github/workflows/publish_stable_release.ymlLength of output: 80
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Check if the referenced workflow file exists if [ -f ".github/workflows/publish_stable_release.yml" ]; then echo "File exists." # Check the full commit history of the file to understand its update frequency git log -- .github/workflows/publish_stable_release.yml else echo "File does not exist." fiLength of output: 108
.github/workflows/publish_alpha.yml (1)
3-18
: Workflow setup is appropriate; reconsider ignored paths.The setup of this workflow is well-suited for alpha releases. However, reconsider ignoring changes to
version.py
andtest/**
as these files might contain relevant changes that could impact the build process.
Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
Files selected for processing (8)
- .github/workflows/license_tests.yml (1 hunks)
- .github/workflows/propose_release.yml (1 hunks)
- .github/workflows/publish_alpha.yml (1 hunks)
- .github/workflows/publish_release.yml (1 hunks)
- .github/workflows/unit_tests.yml (1 hunks)
- ovos_PHAL_plugin_mk2_v6_fan_control/init.py (3 hunks)
- setup.py (1 hunks)
- version.py (1 hunks)
Files skipped from review due to trivial changes (3)
- .github/workflows/license_tests.yml
- .github/workflows/unit_tests.yml
- version.py
Additional comments not posted (4)
.github/workflows/propose_release.yml (1)
1-32
: Workflow setup looks good; verify the referenced workflow.The setup of this workflow is well-designed for proposing releases based on user input. However, ensure that the referenced workflow (
propose_semver_release.yml
) is stable and well-maintained to avoid disruptions.Run the following script to verify the stability and updates of the referenced workflow:
ovos_PHAL_plugin_mk2_v6_fan_control/__init__.py (3)
44-47
: Approve formatting improvements for clarity.The reformatting of the temperature settings in the
__init__
method enhances code readability and maintainability. This change is approved as it makes the configuration values more accessible and understandable.
30-30
: Validate new hardware check logic.The integration of
is_sj201_v6
into the validation logic appears correct. It's crucial to ensure that this function behaves as expected under different hardware conditions to avoid false positives or negatives in hardware detection.
8-8
: Approve updated import for hardware validation.The update from
is_mycroft_sj201
tois_sj201_v6
is a positive change, reflecting a more targeted hardware validation approach. Ensure that the new functionis_sj201_v6
is thoroughly tested to confirm its reliability and accuracy.
Summary by CodeRabbit
New Features
Run License Tests
for license compliance checks.Propose Stable Release
for structured release proposals.Publish Alpha
for automating alpha build distributions to PyPI.Publish Build and GitHub Release
for seamless release distributions.Unit Tests
for automated unit testing.version.py
file for structured version management.Bug Fixes
ovos_PHAL_plugin_mk2_v6_fan_control
module for improved validation.Chores
setup.py
to includeovos-i2c-detection
.