Update imports

[builderjer]

Summary by CodeRabbit

• New Features

  • Introduced multiple GitHub Actions workflows for automated processes:
    • Run License Tests for license compliance checks.
    • Propose Stable Release for structured release proposals.
    • Publish Alpha for automating alpha build distributions to PyPI.
    • Publish Build and GitHub Release for seamless release distributions.
    • Unit Tests for automated unit testing.
  • Added a new version.py file for structured version management.

• Bug Fixes

  • Updated hardware detection method in the ovos_PHAL_plugin_mk2_v6_fan_control module for improved validation.

• Chores

  • Updated dependencies in setup.py to include ovos-i2c-detection.

[coderabbitai]

Warning

Rate limit exceeded

@JarbasAl has exceeded the limit for the number of commits or files that can be reviewed per hour. Please wait 4 minutes and 22 seconds before requesting another review.

How to resolve this issue?

After the wait time has elapsed, a review can be triggered using the @coderabbitai review command as a PR comment. Alternatively, push new commits to this PR.

We recommend that you space out your commits to avoid hitting the rate limit.

How do rate limits work?

CodeRabbit enforces hourly rate limits for each developer per organization.

Our paid plans have higher rate limits than the trial, open-source and free plans. In all cases, we re-allow further reviews after a brief timeout.

Please see our FAQ for further information.

Commits

Files that changed from the base of the PR and between 0c81313 and 66bef44.

Walkthrough

A set of new GitHub Actions workflows has been introduced to automate various aspects of the software development lifecycle, including license compliance checks, release proposals, alpha version publishing, stable release publishing, and unit testing. Additionally, updates have been made to the ovos_PHAL_plugin_mk2_v6_fan_control module, including changes to import statements and validation logic, along with modifications to the setup.py file to include a new dependency.

Changes

Files	Change Summary
.github/workflows/license_tests.yml, .github/workflows/propose_release.yml, .github/workflows/publish_alpha.yml, .github/workflows/publish_release.yml, .github/workflows/unit_tests.yml	New workflows introduced for license tests, release proposals, alpha and stable publishing, and unit testing.
ovos_PHAL_plugin_mk2_v6_fan_control/__init__.py	Updated import statement and validation logic; improved readability in the initialization method.
setup.py	Added a new dependency on ovos-i2c-detection with a version constraint.
version.py	Introduced a new file to manage versioning with major, minor, build, and alpha components.

Poem

🐰 In the garden where code does bloom,
New workflows sprout, dispelling gloom.
With tests and releases, all in a row,
Our project grows, watch it glow!
Hopping along, we celebrate,
Changes so bright, oh, isn’t it great? 🌼

---

Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media?

Share

• X
• Mastodon
• Reddit
• LinkedIn

Tips

Chat

There are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:

• Review comments: Directly reply to a review comment made by CodeRabbit. Example:
  • I pushed a fix in commit <commit_id>.
  • Generate unit testing code for this file.
  • Open a follow-up GitHub issue for this discussion.
• Files and specific lines of code (under the "Files changed" tab): Tag @coderabbitai in a new review comment at the desired location with your query. Examples:
  • @coderabbitai generate unit testing code for this file.
  • @coderabbitai modularize this function.
• PR comments: Tag @coderabbitai in a new PR comment to ask questions about the PR branch. For the best results, please provide a very specific query, as very limited context is provided in this mode. Examples:
  • @coderabbitai generate interesting stats about this repository and render them as a table.
  • @coderabbitai show all the console.log statements in this repository.
  • @coderabbitai read src/utils.ts and generate unit testing code.
  • @coderabbitai read the files in the src/scheduler package and generate a class diagram using mermaid and a README in the markdown format.
  • @coderabbitai help me debug CodeRabbit configuration file.

Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments.

CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)

• @coderabbitai pause to pause the reviews on a PR.
• @coderabbitai resume to resume the paused reviews.
• @coderabbitai review to trigger an incremental review. This is useful when automatic reviews are disabled for the repository.
• @coderabbitai full review to do a full review from scratch and review all the files again.
• @coderabbitai summary to regenerate the summary of the PR.
• @coderabbitai resolve resolve all the CodeRabbit review comments.
• @coderabbitai configuration to show the current CodeRabbit configuration for the repository.
• @coderabbitai help to get help.

Other keywords and placeholders

• Add @coderabbitai ignore anywhere in the PR description to prevent this PR from being reviewed.
• Add @coderabbitai summary to generate the high-level summary at a specific location in the PR description.
• Add @coderabbitai anywhere in the PR title to generate the title automatically.

CodeRabbit Configuration File (.coderabbit.yaml)

• You can programmatically configure CodeRabbit by adding a .coderabbit.yaml file to the root of your repository.
• Please see the configuration documentation for more information.
• If your editor has YAML language server enabled, you can add the path at the top of this file to enable auto-completion and validation: # yaml-language-server: $schema=https://coderabbit.ai/integrations/schema.v2.json

Documentation and Community

• Visit our Documentation for detailed information on how to use CodeRabbit.
• Join our Discord Community to get help, request features, and share feedback.
• Follow us on X/Twitter for updates and announcements.

[coderabbitai]

Actionable comments posted: 1

Outside diff range, codebase verification and nitpick comments (2)

.github/workflows/publish_release.yml (1)

3-13: Critical Issue: Referenced Workflow File Does Not Exist

The workflow in .github/workflows/publish_release.yml references a non-existent file .github/workflows/publish_stable_release.yml. This will cause the workflow to fail. Please ensure that the referenced file is created or update the reference to point to an existing, valid workflow.

• File Missing: .github/workflows/publish_stable_release.yml

Analysis chain

Workflow setup looks good; verify the referenced workflow.

The setup of this workflow is standard and appropriate for publishing releases. However, ensure that the referenced workflow (publish_stable_release.yml) is stable and well-maintained to avoid disruptions.

Run the following script to verify the stability and updates of the referenced workflow:

Scripts executed

The following scripts were executed for the analysis:

Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Description: Check the commit history of the referenced workflow to ensure it is stable.

# Test: Search for recent commits to the referenced workflow. Expect: No frequent or breaking changes.
git log --since="6 months ago" -- .github/workflows/publish_stable_release.yml

Length of output: 80

---

Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Check if the referenced workflow file exists
if [ -f ".github/workflows/publish_stable_release.yml" ]; then
  echo "File exists."
  # Check the full commit history of the file to understand its update frequency
  git log -- .github/workflows/publish_stable_release.yml
else
  echo "File does not exist."
fi

Length of output: 108

.github/workflows/publish_alpha.yml (1)

3-18: Workflow setup is appropriate; reconsider ignored paths.

The setup of this workflow is well-suited for alpha releases. However, reconsider ignoring changes to version.py and test/** as these files might contain relevant changes that could impact the build process.

Review details

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL

Commits

Files that changed from the base of the PR and between af16c13 and 0c81313.

Files selected for processing (8)

• .github/workflows/license_tests.yml (1 hunks)
• .github/workflows/propose_release.yml (1 hunks)
• .github/workflows/publish_alpha.yml (1 hunks)
• .github/workflows/publish_release.yml (1 hunks)
• .github/workflows/unit_tests.yml (1 hunks)
• ovos_PHAL_plugin_mk2_v6_fan_control/init.py (3 hunks)
• setup.py (1 hunks)
• version.py (1 hunks)

Files skipped from review due to trivial changes (3)

• .github/workflows/license_tests.yml
• .github/workflows/unit_tests.yml
• version.py

Additional comments not posted (4)

.github/workflows/propose_release.yml (1)

1-32: Workflow setup looks good; verify the referenced workflow.

The setup of this workflow is well-designed for proposing releases based on user input. However, ensure that the referenced workflow (propose_semver_release.yml) is stable and well-maintained to avoid disruptions.

Run the following script to verify the stability and updates of the referenced workflow:

ovos_PHAL_plugin_mk2_v6_fan_control/__init__.py (3)

44-47: Approve formatting improvements for clarity.

The reformatting of the temperature settings in the __init__ method enhances code readability and maintainability. This change is approved as it makes the configuration values more accessible and understandable.

---

30-30: Validate new hardware check logic.

The integration of is_sj201_v6 into the validation logic appears correct. It's crucial to ensure that this function behaves as expected under different hardware conditions to avoid false positives or negatives in hardware detection.

---

8-8: Approve updated import for hardware validation.

The update from is_mycroft_sj201 to is_sj201_v6 is a positive change, reflecting a more targeted hardware validation approach. Ensure that the new function is_sj201_v6 is thoroughly tested to confirm its reliability and accuracy.