N-[9,11]: fix ERC7984Rwa docs

[arr00]

Summary by CodeRabbit

• New Features

  • Extended confidential transfer capabilities with a new method that simplifies transfers by accepting only recipient and encrypted amount, eliminating additional parameter requirements and automatically returning transfer confirmation.

• Documentation

  • Updated documentation for transfer operations and access control.

[netlify]

✅ Deploy Preview for confidential-tokens ready!

Name	Link
🔨 Latest commit	b9a6bd5
🔍 Latest deploy log	https://app.netlify.com/projects/confidential-tokens/deploys/6914c8bfd0153e000706a1a0
😎 Deploy Preview	https://deploy-preview-249--confidential-tokens.netlify.app
📱 Preview on mobile	Toggle QR Code... Use your smartphone camera to open QR code link.

---

To edit notification comments on pull requests, go to your Netlify project configuration.

[coderabbitai]

Important

Review skipped

Auto incremental reviews are disabled on this repository.

Please check the settings in the CodeRabbit UI or the .coderabbit.yaml file in this repository. To trigger a single review, invoke the @coderabbitai review command.

You can disable this status message by setting the reviews.review_status to false in the CodeRabbit configuration file.

Walkthrough

A new overload of forceConfidentialTransferFrom is added to the ERC7984Rwa contract, enabling AGENT_ROLE to perform confidential transfers using only encrypted amounts without input proofs. The existing overload remains intact. Related method documentation is updated for clarity.

Changes

Cohort / File(s)	Summary
API Expansion & Documentation Updates contracts/token/ERC7984/extensions/ERC7984Rwa.sol	New overload of forceConfidentialTransferFrom(address from, address to, euint64 encryptedAmount) restricted to AGENT_ROLE for amount-only transfers. Existing overload with externalEuint64 and inputProof parameters preserved. Inline documentation updated for setConfidentialFrozen and both forceConfidentialTransferFrom overloads.

Estimated code review effort

🎯 2 (Simple) | ⏱️ ~10 minutes

• Verify AGENT_ROLE access control enforcement on new overload
• Confirm backward compatibility with existing overload signature
• Review updated documentation for accuracy and clarity
• Validate that both overloads serve distinct use cases without unintended overlap

Suggested reviewers

• james-toussaint

Poem

🐰 A transfer finds a lighter way,
No proofs required, just encrypted sway,
Two paths now dance in harmony divine,
The agent's touch makes confidence align! ✨

Pre-merge checks and finishing touches

❌ Failed checks (1 inconclusive)

Check name	Status	Explanation	Resolution
Title check	❓ Inconclusive	The title references fixing docs but the changeset adds a new method overload and updates inline documentation, making it only partially aligned with the primary change of adding new functionality.	Clarify whether the primary change is adding the new method overload or fixing documentation; consider a title like 'Add forceConfidentialTransferFrom overload for amount-only transfers' if the new method is the main contribution.

✅ Passed checks (2 passed)

Check name	Status	Explanation
Description Check	✅ Passed	Check skipped - CodeRabbit’s high-level summary is enabled.
Docstring Coverage	✅ Passed	No functions found in the changed files to evaluate docstring coverage. Skipping docstring coverage check.

---

_{Comment @coderabbitai help to get the list of available commands and usage tips.}

[james-toussaint]

What do you mean with does not require any permission here compared to other abilities listed below?

[arr00]

can pull tokens from a users wallet without their permission.