-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 168
Node-based double linked list of Particles - DO NOT MERGE - DO NOT CLOSE #862
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Closed
Conversation
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This was referenced Jun 24, 2020
Merged
erikvansebille
added a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Sep 3, 2020
…re not (yet) used in parcels These were accidentally brought over from #862, where they were needed
4dbb5ae to
6096c78
Compare
af23339 to
3542355
Compare
a9cb562 to
dc621b5
Compare
12b5226 to
2c07907
Compare
CKehl
pushed a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Dec 1, 2020
…re not (yet) used in parcels These were accidentally brought over from #862, where they were needed
CKehl
pushed a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Dec 1, 2020
…re not (yet) used in parcels These were accidentally brought over from #862, where they were needed
CKehl
pushed a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Dec 1, 2020
…re not (yet) used in parcels These were accidentally brought over from #862, where they were needed
8f0f20f to
39e748f
Compare
1be9653 to
c040beb
Compare
49fabf2 to
3f24224
Compare
…into sorted_pset_trials
…and bickley-jet case - for prediodic studies.
…into sorted_pset_trials
This was referenced Feb 9, 2021
…he benchmarking branch
…ument write-out and the outfile-path--join in the palaeo-parcels case
…ile, as Kernel gives ParticleFile an array of particles instead of a ParticleSet. issue fixed and to-be-tested.
…more memory-conserving, as it currently caps the what is possible under memory constraints.
…c overflow of the ID generator for very-long simulations
…c overflow of the ID generator for very-long simulations
…rticleSet of nodes.
…memory footprint.
…rapolation to the deep_migration scenario
…ion if a node was created with a particle-data container but without explicit ID forward (but implicit by the Particle instance itself).
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
branch 'sorted_pset_trials' - DO NOT MERGE - DO NOT CLOSE
This is only opened as a PR to give a sneak-preview on the extensive C-Python work for changing how particles are represented as Nodes in a double-linked, sorted list (similiar to C++ STL sets). In incorporates many other changes that had to be done to facilitate the functionality, which can be taken as inspiration for general Parcels refactoring.
when watching the changes exclusive to THIS idea, start file comparison at 9a8dd02 and later
again: DO NOT MERGE - DO NOT CLOSE