Refactor ExportRequest

[amandine-sahl]

Prise en compte remarque PR #155
Ajout paramètre --skip-newer-than et utilisation de ce dernière pour les fichiers non scheduler

[codecov]

Codecov Report

Patch coverage: 87.17% and project coverage change: +7.60 🎉

Comparison is base (8d1cd22) 53.52% compared to head (c0fca8c) 61.13%.

❗ Current head c0fca8c differs from pull request most recent head 423d835. Consider uploading reports for the commit 423d835 to get more accurate results

Additional details and impacted files

@@             Coverage Diff              @@
##           workshop     #166      +/-   ##
============================================
+ Coverage     53.52%   61.13%   +7.60%     
============================================
  Files            12       11       -1     
  Lines           680      669      -11     
============================================
+ Hits            364      409      +45     
+ Misses          316      260      -56     

Flag	Coverage Δ
pytest	61.13% <87.17%> (+7.60%)	⬆️

Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown. Click here to find out more.

Impacted Files	Coverage Δ
backend/gn_module_export/blueprint.py	56.61% <0.00%> (-0.63%)	⬇️
backend/gn_module_export/tasks.py	84.21% <ø> (+14.21%)	⬆️
backend/gn_module_export/utils_export.py	90.00% <86.20%> (+46.06%)	⬆️
backend/gn_module_export/commands.py	77.19% <100.00%> (+33.12%)	⬆️
backend/gn_module_export/models.py	95.78% <100.00%> (+0.38%)	⬆️
backend/gn_module_export/utils/export.py	96.15% <100.00%> (+0.50%)	⬆️

... and 1 file with indirect coverage changes

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Do you have feedback about the report comment? Let us know in this issue.

[bouttier]

À priori c’est pas fait pour ça test_request_context ! C’est quoi le soucis qui t’as amené à devoir le mettre ?

[amandine-sahl]

C'est l'usage d'url_for qui ne peut être appeler que dans le contexte d'une requête. Sauf si on lui spécifie le SERVER_NAME.

https://flask.palletsprojects.com/en/2.3.x/api/#flask.Flask.url_for