-
-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 4.6k
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Windows x64 and Ubuntu CI jobs run out of space #3387
Comments
I believe I've seen this before on multiple occasions, but not too often. Any ideas about what to do with this? @SunBlack you are into VS, are there any tricks to reduce memory requirements? |
My current machine has 40GB, so it is not relevant for me ;-). But as far as I remember I had memory issue (swapping) on my old laptop - and there it helped to turn off But in general: |
I don't think ccache will store the exception since it seems to be storing |
Hm, with It seems like free tier limitations can be increased on a per-project basis. I'm not sure if it only applies to the number of jobs, or the data volume as well. But we may try to contact them. |
I've created a support ticket about this. Let's see what they answer. |
Unfortunately, the storage space limit can not be lifted:
However, we got 2 extra parallel jobs as a consolation prize:
|
That's a bit of a sad news. I'm still plodding away at trying to reduce cache size on #3415. For Windows, I fail to see the benefit of a compiler cache in that case since we are exceeding the space limit already... (Unless we delete unneeded files while building which sounds like a hassle)
This can offset waiting time due to the new pipeline for format checking 😄 |
Thanks. We need that!
Well, that pipeline only takes 1 minute anyway. But actually, I've been planning to add another Ubuntu job to the matrix. |
18.04 hopefully!! |
I'd rather go for the most-up-to-date version, i.e. 19.04 right now (and 19.10 soon). This would allow us to catch issues with new versions of CMake, compilers, dependency packages before they get "frozen" into the next LTS. |
Marking this as stale due to 30 days of inactivity. It will be closed in 7 days if no further activity occurs. |
Instead of Release, we could try using MinSizeRel to reduce the binary size and save space on the disk |
I am not sure about Azure Pipelines, but for GitHub Actions (that share some infrastructure with Azure Pipelines) a workaround I have successfully used is to move the build directory to |
That's 500KB, right? 😕 Still huge compared to debug version. Any takers for my bet? 1 or more of these 3:
|
Nop, the |
At least on GitHub Actions the actual available size depend on the image version, so tipically I monitor the actual available space via a step that executes on bash |
Thanks @traversaro That's a nifty trick. Created 2 issues and a PR. Is there anything else we can do for this? |
@kunaltyagi I would say this issue can be closed? I believe I haven't seen a CI job running out of space since we switched the Windows CI to Docker. |
Yeah. Docker also saved a lot of time, and more coverage for windows |
There have been CI failures for Windows x64 check. Both #3386 and #3354 have the same issue
Current Behavior
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: