Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

not using UltraBalls if normal pokeballs count=0 #2097

Closed
wcrwcr opened this issue Jul 31, 2016 · 4 comments
Closed

not using UltraBalls if normal pokeballs count=0 #2097

wcrwcr opened this issue Jul 31, 2016 · 4 comments

Comments

@wcrwcr
Copy link
Contributor

wcrwcr commented Jul 31, 2016

Expected Behavior

use avail pokeballs

Actual Behavior

[18:24:22] Items: 387/350
...
[18:24:22] PokeBalls: 0 | GreatBalls: 0 | UltraBalls: 86
...
[18:25:11] A Wild Staryu appeared! [CP 103] [Potential 0.27]
[18:25:11] IV [Stamina/Attack/Defense] = [0/9/3]
[18:25:13] Using Pokeball (chance: 68.91%)... (-1 left!)

Steps to Reproduce

have zero normal pokeballs, then max out items

Other Information

OS: win7
Git Commit: 3fe8eb0

@wcrwcr
Copy link
Contributor Author

wcrwcr commented Jul 31, 2016

probably duplicate of #2075

@xc-mezcal
Copy link
Contributor

Check this PR
#2113

If you set VIP pokemons in the config file, this indicates, you want to use better strategy to capture VIP pokemons, means you want to save Ultra Balls.

If you delete VIP pokemons section in config file, it will use whatever balls to catch them all.

@wcrwcr
Copy link
Contributor Author

wcrwcr commented Jul 31, 2016

sounds like really unobvious behavior, should be defined in configs imo.

@xorinzor
Copy link

xorinzor commented Aug 1, 2016

Duplicate of #2075

Please check for existing issues first

hoanghuynh pushed a commit to hoanghuynh/PokemonGo-Bot that referenced this issue Sep 28, 2016
* Makes --scan-delay argument a float value.
* Propagates --scan-delay value to REQ_SLEEP config.
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

4 participants