Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

pokebal already 0 but still use it #2243

Closed
fari-99 opened this issue Aug 1, 2016 · 3 comments
Closed

pokebal already 0 but still use it #2243

fari-99 opened this issue Aug 1, 2016 · 3 comments

Comments

@fari-99
Copy link

fari-99 commented Aug 1, 2016

Expected Behavior

use another ball

Actual Behavior

[22:38:26] A Wild Rhyhorn appeared! [CP 49] [Potential 0.64]
[22:38:26] IV [Attack/Defense/Stamina] = [15/7/7]
[22:38:30] Using Pokeball (chance: 100.00%)... (0 left!)
[22:38:35] Lured pokemon at fort afee005c1ec94567b727a8f74202dec0.16

Steps to Reproduce

run the bot

Other Information

OS: Windows 10
Git Commit: 494bc05
Python Version: Python 2.7.12

@fari-99
Copy link
Author

fari-99 commented Aug 1, 2016

Btw this is dev issue.

@xorinzor
Copy link

xorinzor commented Aug 1, 2016

Duplicate of #1755, #1893, #2043, #2097 and #2075

Please check for an existing issue next time

@fari-99 fari-99 closed this as completed Aug 1, 2016
@fari-99
Copy link
Author

fari-99 commented Aug 2, 2016

@xorinzor hey, i still got the problem after changing catch_rate, i think the problem is when pokeball and greatball is 0 and you have VIP pokemon it still using pokeball or greatball, because it's not VIP pokemon it's still using pokeball.

btw where is the mode for farm and catch? should i delete the catch task to farm? or create a function so after i have some amount of pokeball and greatball it became normal again?

@fari-99 fari-99 reopened this Aug 2, 2016
hoanghuynh pushed a commit to hoanghuynh/PokemonGo-Bot that referenced this issue Sep 28, 2016
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

3 participants