Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Dynamic risk matrix #433

Closed
pzljanb opened this issue Mar 16, 2021 · 7 comments · Fixed by #873, #874 or #879
Closed

Dynamic risk matrix #433

pzljanb opened this issue Mar 16, 2021 · 7 comments · Fixed by #873, #874 or #879
Assignees
Labels
enhancement Request that will enhance the product funding required Requires funding for development
Milestone

Comments

@pzljanb
Copy link
Contributor

pzljanb commented Mar 16, 2021

Is your feature request related to a problem? Please describe.
Not all organizations uses 5x5 risk matrix.

Describe the solution you'd like
A dynamic soluton where you can configure the size of the matrix.
E.g. 4x4, 6x6
This should be configurable on Hub level to maintain similarity thru the Portfolio level.

Additional context
In case of project by project configuration the definition used should also be identified to make it groupable on portfolio level.

@pzljanb pzljanb added the enhancement Request that will enhance the product label Mar 16, 2021
@pzljanb pzljanb added the funding required Requires funding for development label Apr 8, 2021
@pzljanb pzljanb modified the milestone: 1.3.0 Apr 13, 2021
@olemp
Copy link
Collaborator

olemp commented May 26, 2021

@pzljanb Could be doable, but requires changes in the fields aswell as in the code for the risk matrix. The fields have min and max values set to fit a 5x5 risk matrix.

This also needs financing.

@olemp olemp linked a pull request Sep 2, 2021 that will close this issue
5 tasks
@olemp olemp removed a link to a pull request Sep 2, 2021
5 tasks
olemp added a commit that referenced this issue Sep 2, 2021
olemp added a commit that referenced this issue Sep 3, 2021
Rundez pushed a commit that referenced this issue Sep 28, 2021
@okms okms modified the milestone: 1.4.0 Sep 29, 2021
Rundez pushed a commit that referenced this issue Oct 12, 2021
olemp added a commit that referenced this issue Oct 12, 2021
olemp added a commit that referenced this issue Oct 13, 2021
olemp added a commit that referenced this issue Oct 13, 2021
olemp added a commit that referenced this issue Oct 13, 2021
olemp added a commit that referenced this issue Oct 14, 2021
olemp added a commit that referenced this issue Oct 14, 2021
olemp added a commit that referenced this issue Oct 14, 2021
@tarjeieo
Copy link
Member

@Rundez have a look at this one, did you support this configuration as part of the changes you made in the program branch?

@Rundez
Copy link
Contributor

Rundez commented Jan 27, 2022

@tarjeieo Yes, this configuration is supported. But it would need changes in the fields, and some css-tweaking to get the scaling right on smaller screens. Maybe @siifux could do this as part of the facelift he's doing?

@olemp olemp self-assigned this Nov 3, 2022
@olemp olemp mentioned this issue Nov 3, 2022
6 tasks
olemp added a commit that referenced this issue Nov 3, 2022
@olemp olemp linked a pull request Nov 3, 2022 that will close this issue
6 tasks
@olemp
Copy link
Collaborator

olemp commented Nov 3, 2022

Risk matrix made much more dynamic.

Can now decide between 4x4, 5x5 and 6x6 and also change the color gradatin if you'd like:

image

image

image

4x4

image

5x5

image

6x6

image

It's also supported to use full width:

image

@olemp olemp linked a pull request Nov 3, 2022 that will close this issue
6 tasks
@Remi749
Copy link
Collaborator

Remi749 commented Nov 4, 2022

Wow, this looks great @olemp !

@pzljanb
Copy link
Contributor Author

pzljanb commented Nov 4, 2022

Fantastic @olemp

@olemp
Copy link
Collaborator

olemp commented Nov 4, 2022

Good to hear! Now it's much easier to do #499

@olemp olemp linked a pull request Nov 4, 2022 that will close this issue
6 tasks
@olemp olemp mentioned this issue Nov 4, 2022
6 tasks
@Remi749 Remi749 added this to the 1.8 milestone Jan 2, 2023
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
enhancement Request that will enhance the product funding required Requires funding for development
Projects
None yet
6 participants