Add a test to CI for checking docker build and tutorial notebooks

[caleb-johnson]

Summary

Add a test to CI for testing the jupyter build and the tutorial notebooks on pushes to main

[psschwei]

Seems like the test failure is when trying to connect to the gateway service.

It might be worth adding a step to dump the logs on failure... something like:

- name: dump logs on failure
  if: ${{ failure() }}
  run: |
    docker compose logs gateway
    docker compose logs jupyter
    ...

[psschwei]

It might be worth just running the getting started notebooks in the test, as those should let us know whether the basic functionality (setting up a provider, submitting a program, getting results) is working or not.

[caleb-johnson]

It might be worth just running the getting started notebooks in the test, as those should let us know whether the basic functionality (setting up a provider, submitting a program, getting results) is working or not.

I see where you're coming from, but I think if we build everything, we might as well make sure all our docs will actually run for the users. This is kind of like a docker build test + a notebooks test in my mind.

I'm planning on ignoring the ElectronicStructureProblem notebook for now. The Nature code in there is badly deprecated and about to be broken soon. It needs a total refactor.

There is also a strange ray visualization in 07_working_with_large_datasets -- ray.data.from_items(...).show(1) -- that is breaking only in CI (not locally). I'm going to comment that out and see if I can get these tests passing, and then we can decide where to go from there with these couple of straggler notebooks

[caleb-johnson]

We will ignore two tests here.

#671 PR will handle the ESProblem notebook
#672 explains why we will ignore the dataset notebook here to start. I will follow up with @IceKhan13 about why Ray is behaving like this in CI and address this issue in a separate PR

[caleb-johnson]

For some reason, when I go to old commits in which this docker test pased, there is no sign of those tests being run. Kind of strange... I suppose you'll have to take my word this test passes the CI? :)

[psschwei]

LGTM - kicked this test again just to see, but once it's done I think we're good to merge this