Increase NGINX body-size

[Tansito]

Summary

Fix #818
Co-authored-by: @psschwei

Confirmed with the infrastructure team and added the required label specified in the issue: proxy-body-size.

[IceKhan13]

🚀

[akihikokuroda]

I got a little confused with the changes in the value.yaml file change for the local install. There are 2 ingress instances configurations in the value file. One is installed with Ray operator and the other is installed as a dependency of the quantum-serferless chart. The changes make the change in the ingress installed with Ray operator that is not enable for the local install. The other ingress is enabled for the local install.

[Tansito]

Mmm... Which instance for Ray operator do you mean, @akihikokuroda ?

Right now I see two different instances:

• Local NGINX for local development, managed by nginxIngressControllerEnable
• NGINX configuration for 3rd party cloud platforms

I admit that there we can have a bit of confuse because depending on the provider we are going to need to change that configuration. I'm totally open to improve that (I think @psschwei mentioned before some ways to fix it).
Sorry, I don't know if I'm following you here, @akihikokuroda 🙏

[akihikokuroda]

I might be still confused. The ingress would be created by this but it is skipped for the local install by this

[psschwei]

The other ingress is enabled for the local install.

The other ingress being the quantum-serverless dependency, right?

FWIW, I've never used ingress with a local install, always just done port-forwarding of the gateway (and the notebook, if I'm running that via k8s).

[akihikokuroda]

@psschwei Yes, it is.

[psschwei]

Ahh, I missed your last comment (need to remember to refresh the page if I leave it open too long before commenting 😄 )

[Tansito]

I might be still confused. The ingress would be created by this but it is skipped for the local install by this

I see your point and I was not aware about that if. So you are right, @akihikokuroda . We should add in the hosts probably a configuration for that, then. Another discussion that we can have is what @psschwei commented about using NGINX vs port-forwarding in local. In fact, from what I was reading about the notes that @jenglick collected from the users, for local testing most of the people were using the docker-compose not the cluster so... I was reviewing our current UX because I think we can improve it a little bit and even remove the NGINX for local development. I will open a discussion for this, soon.

cc to @IceKhan13 too here 👀