Supported hardware update... #5
Comments
|
Please look at https://radeonopencompute.github.io/hardware.html GFX8: Radeon R9 Nano, Radeon R9 Fury,, Radeon R9 Fury X, and FirePro S9300 x2 with revolutionary HBM memories with 512 GB/s per ASIC. Currently the highest efficiency of 46 GFLOPS/watt. R9 Nano is 8 Tflops and S9300x2 support solid 14.9 Tflops of single precision performance to attack Machine Learning, Molecular Dynamics, Energy, and Signal Processing Problems CPU Support: ROCm requires CPU's with PCIe Gen3 Atomics supports such as the Intel Xeon E5 v3 or newer Xeon processors. It will also support consumer class CPU such as the Haswell class Intel Core CPU processors or newer. We know your going to ask, yes ROCm is optimized to pull all the rich new capabilities out of the new AMD Zen based processors. |
Closed
fxkamd
pushed a commit
that referenced
this issue
Mar 4, 2018
Patch series "mm, hugetlb: allocation API and migration improvements" Motivation: this is a follow up for [3] for the allocation API and [4] for the hugetlb migration. It wasn't really easy to split those into two separate patch series as they share some code. My primary motivation to touch this code is to make the gigantic pages migration working. The giga pages allocation code is just too fragile and hacked into the hugetlb code now. This series tries to move giga pages closer to the first class citizen. We are not there yet but having 5 patches is quite a lot already and it will already make the code much easier to follow. I will come with other changes on top after this sees some review. The first two patches should be trivial to review. The third patch changes the way how we migrate huge pages. Newly allocated pages are a subject of the overcommit check and they participate surplus accounting which is quite unfortunate as the changelog explains. This patch doesn't change anything wrt. giga pages. Patch #4 removes the surplus accounting hack from __alloc_surplus_huge_page. I hope I didn't miss anything there and a deeper review is really due there. Patch #5 finally unifies allocation paths and giga pages shouldn't be any special anymore. There is also some renaming going on as well. This patch (of 6): hugetlb allocator has two entry points to the page allocator - alloc_fresh_huge_page_node - __hugetlb_alloc_buddy_huge_page The two differ very subtly in two aspects. The first one doesn't care about HTLB_BUDDY_* stats and it doesn't initialize the huge page. prep_new_huge_page is not used because it not only initializes hugetlb specific stuff but because it also put_page and releases the page to the hugetlb pool which is not what is required in some contexts. This makes things more complicated than necessary. Simplify things by a) removing the page allocator entry point duplicity and only keep __hugetlb_alloc_buddy_huge_page and b) make prep_new_huge_page more reusable by removing the put_page which moves the page to the allocator pool. All current callers are updated to call put_page explicitly. Later patches will add new callers which won't need it. This patch shouldn't introduce any functional change. Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/20180103093213.26329-2-mhocko@kernel.org Signed-off-by: Michal Hocko <mhocko@suse.com> Reviewed-by: Mike Kravetz <mike.kravetz@oracle.com> Reviewed-by: Naoya Horiguchi <n-horiguchi@ah.jp.nec.com> Cc: Andrea Reale <ar@linux.vnet.ibm.com> Cc: Anshuman Khandual <khandual@linux.vnet.ibm.com> Cc: Kirill A. Shutemov <kirill.shutemov@linux.intel.com> Cc: Vlastimil Babka <vbabka@suse.cz> Cc: Zi Yan <zi.yan@cs.rutgers.edu> Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
fxkamd
pushed a commit
that referenced
this issue
Mar 4, 2018
Scenario: 1. Port down and do fail over 2. Ap do rds_bind syscall PID: 47039 TASK: ffff89887e2fe640 CPU: 47 COMMAND: "kworker/u:6" #0 [ffff898e35f159f0] machine_kexec at ffffffff8103abf9 #1 [ffff898e35f15a60] crash_kexec at ffffffff810b96e3 #2 [ffff898e35f15b30] oops_end at ffffffff8150f518 #3 [ffff898e35f15b60] no_context at ffffffff8104854c #4 [ffff898e35f15ba0] __bad_area_nosemaphore at ffffffff81048675 #5 [ffff898e35f15bf0] bad_area_nosemaphore at ffffffff810487d3 #6 [ffff898e35f15c00] do_page_fault at ffffffff815120b8 #7 [ffff898e35f15d10] page_fault at ffffffff8150ea95 [exception RIP: unknown or invalid address] RIP: 0000000000000000 RSP: ffff898e35f15dc8 RFLAGS: 00010282 RAX: 00000000fffffffe RBX: ffff889b77f6fc00 RCX:ffffffff81c99d88 RDX: 0000000000000000 RSI: ffff896019ee08e8 RDI:ffff889b77f6fc00 RBP: ffff898e35f15df0 R8: ffff896019ee08c8 R9:0000000000000000 R10: 0000000000000400 R11: 0000000000000000 R12:ffff896019ee08c0 R13: ffff889b77f6fe68 R14: ffffffff81c99d80 R15: ffffffffa022a1e0 ORIG_RAX: ffffffffffffffff CS: 0010 SS: 0018 #8 [ffff898e35f15dc8] cma_ndev_work_handler at ffffffffa022a228 [rdma_cm] #9 [ffff898e35f15df8] process_one_work at ffffffff8108a7c6 #10 [ffff898e35f15e58] worker_thread at ffffffff8108bda0 #11 [ffff898e35f15ee8] kthread at ffffffff81090fe6 PID: 45659 TASK: ffff880d313d2500 CPU: 31 COMMAND: "oracle_45659_ap" #0 [ffff881024ccfc98] __schedule at ffffffff8150bac4 #1 [ffff881024ccfd40] schedule at ffffffff8150c2cf #2 [ffff881024ccfd50] __mutex_lock_slowpath at ffffffff8150cee7 #3 [ffff881024ccfdc0] mutex_lock at ffffffff8150cdeb #4 [ffff881024ccfde0] rdma_destroy_id at ffffffffa022a027 [rdma_cm] #5 [ffff881024ccfe10] rds_ib_laddr_check at ffffffffa0357857 [rds_rdma] #6 [ffff881024ccfe50] rds_trans_get_preferred at ffffffffa0324c2a [rds] #7 [ffff881024ccfe80] rds_bind at ffffffffa031d690 [rds] #8 [ffff881024ccfeb0] sys_bind at ffffffff8142a670 PID: 45659 PID: 47039 rds_ib_laddr_check /* create id_priv with a null event_handler */ rdma_create_id rdma_bind_addr cma_acquire_dev /* add id_priv to cma_dev->id_list */ cma_attach_to_dev cma_ndev_work_handler /* event_hanlder is null */ id_priv->id.event_handler Signed-off-by: Guanglei Li <guanglei.li@oracle.com> Signed-off-by: Honglei Wang <honglei.wang@oracle.com> Reviewed-by: Junxiao Bi <junxiao.bi@oracle.com> Reviewed-by: Yanjun Zhu <yanjun.zhu@oracle.com> Reviewed-by: Leon Romanovsky <leonro@mellanox.com> Acked-by: Santosh Shilimkar <santosh.shilimkar@oracle.com> Acked-by: Doug Ledford <dledford@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
Closed
kentrussell
pushed a commit
that referenced
this issue
Jul 30, 2021
Code in the amdgpu driver triggers a bug when using clang to build an arm64 kernel: /tmp/sdma_v4_0-f95fd3.s: Assembler messages: /tmp/sdma_v4_0-f95fd3.s:44: Error: selected processor does not support `bfc w0,#1,#5' I expect this to be fixed in llvm soon, but we can also work around it by inserting a barrier() that prevents the optimization. Link: https://bugs.llvm.org/show_bug.cgi?id=42576 Signed-off-by: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de> Signed-off-by: Alex Deucher <alexander.deucher@amd.com>
kentrussell
pushed a commit
that referenced
this issue
Feb 9, 2022
Code in the amdgpu driver triggers a bug when using clang to build an arm64 kernel: /tmp/sdma_v4_0-f95fd3.s: Assembler messages: /tmp/sdma_v4_0-f95fd3.s:44: Error: selected processor does not support `bfc w0,#1,#5' I expect this to be fixed in llvm soon, but we can also work around it by inserting a barrier() that prevents the optimization. Link: https://bugs.llvm.org/show_bug.cgi?id=42576 Signed-off-by: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de> Signed-off-by: Alex Deucher <alexander.deucher@amd.com>
kentrussell
pushed a commit
that referenced
this issue
Mar 30, 2022
Noticed the below warning while running a pytorch workload on vega10
GPUs. Change to trylock to avoid conflicts with already held reservation
locks.
[ +0.000003] WARNING: possible recursive locking detected
[ +0.000003] 5.13.0-kfd-rajneesh #1030 Not tainted
[ +0.000004] --------------------------------------------
[ +0.000002] python/4822 is trying to acquire lock:
[ +0.000004] ffff932cd9a259f8 (reservation_ww_class_mutex){+.+.}-{3:3},
at: amdgpu_bo_release_notify+0xc4/0x160 [amdgpu]
[ +0.000203]
but task is already holding lock:
[ +0.000003] ffff932cbb7181f8 (reservation_ww_class_mutex){+.+.}-{3:3},
at: ttm_eu_reserve_buffers+0x270/0x470 [ttm]
[ +0.000017]
other info that might help us debug this:
[ +0.000002] Possible unsafe locking scenario:
[ +0.000003] CPU0
[ +0.000002] ----
[ +0.000002] lock(reservation_ww_class_mutex);
[ +0.000004] lock(reservation_ww_class_mutex);
[ +0.000003]
*** DEADLOCK ***
[ +0.000002] May be due to missing lock nesting notation
[ +0.000003] 7 locks held by python/4822:
[ +0.000003] #0: ffff932c4ac028d0 (&process->mutex){+.+.}-{3:3}, at:
kfd_ioctl_map_memory_to_gpu+0x10b/0x320 [amdgpu]
[ +0.000232] #1: ffff932c55e830a8 (&info->lock#2){+.+.}-{3:3}, at:
amdgpu_amdkfd_gpuvm_map_memory_to_gpu+0x64/0xf60 [amdgpu]
[ +0.000241] #2: ffff932cc45b5e68 (&(*mem)->lock){+.+.}-{3:3}, at:
amdgpu_amdkfd_gpuvm_map_memory_to_gpu+0xdf/0xf60 [amdgpu]
[ +0.000236] #3: ffffb2b35606fd28
(reservation_ww_class_acquire){+.+.}-{0:0}, at:
amdgpu_amdkfd_gpuvm_map_memory_to_gpu+0x232/0xf60 [amdgpu]
[ +0.000235] #4: ffff932cbb7181f8
(reservation_ww_class_mutex){+.+.}-{3:3}, at:
ttm_eu_reserve_buffers+0x270/0x470 [ttm]
[ +0.000015] #5: ffffffffc045f700 (*(sspp++)){....}-{0:0}, at:
drm_dev_enter+0x5/0xa0 [drm]
[ +0.000038] #6: ffff932c52da7078 (&vm->eviction_lock){+.+.}-{3:3},
at: amdgpu_vm_bo_update_mapping+0xd5/0x4f0 [amdgpu]
[ +0.000195]
stack backtrace:
[ +0.000003] CPU: 11 PID: 4822 Comm: python Not tainted
5.13.0-kfd-rajneesh #1030
[ +0.000005] Hardware name: GIGABYTE MZ01-CE0-00/MZ01-CE0-00, BIOS F02
08/29/2018
[ +0.000003] Call Trace:
[ +0.000003] dump_stack+0x6d/0x89
[ +0.000010] __lock_acquire+0xb93/0x1a90
[ +0.000009] lock_acquire+0x25d/0x2d0
[ +0.000005] ? amdgpu_bo_release_notify+0xc4/0x160 [amdgpu]
[ +0.000184] ? lock_is_held_type+0xa2/0x110
[ +0.000006] ? amdgpu_bo_release_notify+0xc4/0x160 [amdgpu]
[ +0.000184] __ww_mutex_lock.constprop.17+0xca/0x1060
[ +0.000007] ? amdgpu_bo_release_notify+0xc4/0x160 [amdgpu]
[ +0.000183] ? lock_release+0x13f/0x270
[ +0.000005] ? lock_is_held_type+0xa2/0x110
[ +0.000006] ? amdgpu_bo_release_notify+0xc4/0x160 [amdgpu]
[ +0.000183] amdgpu_bo_release_notify+0xc4/0x160 [amdgpu]
[ +0.000185] ttm_bo_release+0x4c6/0x580 [ttm]
[ +0.000010] amdgpu_bo_unref+0x1a/0x30 [amdgpu]
[ +0.000183] amdgpu_vm_free_table+0x76/0xa0 [amdgpu]
[ +0.000189] amdgpu_vm_free_pts+0xb8/0xf0 [amdgpu]
[ +0.000189] amdgpu_vm_update_ptes+0x411/0x770 [amdgpu]
[ +0.000191] amdgpu_vm_bo_update_mapping+0x324/0x4f0 [amdgpu]
[ +0.000191] amdgpu_vm_bo_update+0x251/0x610 [amdgpu]
[ +0.000191] update_gpuvm_pte+0xcc/0x290 [amdgpu]
[ +0.000229] ? amdgpu_vm_bo_map+0xd7/0x130 [amdgpu]
[ +0.000190] amdgpu_amdkfd_gpuvm_map_memory_to_gpu+0x912/0xf60
[amdgpu]
[ +0.000234] kfd_ioctl_map_memory_to_gpu+0x182/0x320 [amdgpu]
[ +0.000218] kfd_ioctl+0x2b9/0x600 [amdgpu]
[ +0.000216] ? kfd_ioctl_unmap_memory_from_gpu+0x270/0x270 [amdgpu]
[ +0.000216] ? lock_release+0x13f/0x270
[ +0.000006] ? __fget_files+0x107/0x1e0
[ +0.000007] __x64_sys_ioctl+0x8b/0xd0
[ +0.000007] do_syscall_64+0x36/0x70
[ +0.000004] entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x44/0xae
[ +0.000007] RIP: 0033:0x7fbff90a7317
[ +0.000004] Code: b3 66 90 48 8b 05 71 4b 2d 00 64 c7 00 26 00 00 00
48 c7 c0 ff ff ff ff c3 66 2e 0f 1f 84 00 00 00 00 00 b8 10 00 00 00 0f
05 <48> 3d 01 f0 ff ff 73 01 c3 48 8b 0d 41 4b 2d 00 f7 d8 64 89 01 48
[ +0.000005] RSP: 002b:00007fbe301fe648 EFLAGS: 00000246 ORIG_RAX:
0000000000000010
[ +0.000006] RAX: ffffffffffffffda RBX: 00007fbcc402d820 RCX:
00007fbff90a7317
[ +0.000003] RDX: 00007fbe301fe690 RSI: 00000000c0184b18 RDI:
0000000000000004
[ +0.000003] RBP: 00007fbe301fe690 R08: 0000000000000000 R09:
00007fbcc402d880
[ +0.000003] R10: 0000000002001000 R11: 0000000000000246 R12:
00000000c0184b18
[ +0.000003] R13: 0000000000000004 R14: 00007fbf689593a0 R15:
00007fbcc402d820
Cc: Christian König <christian.koenig@amd.com>
Cc: Felix Kuehling <Felix.Kuehling@amd.com>
Cc: Alex Deucher <Alexander.Deucher@amd.com>
Reviewed-by: Christian König <christian.koenig@amd.com>
Reviewed-by: Felix Kuehling <Felix.Kuehling@amd.com>
Signed-off-by: Rajneesh Bhardwaj <rajneesh.bhardwaj@amd.com>
Change-Id: I963075708afaaadccd6b70ad73358bd89805f257
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Hi,
Do you have additional information about supported hardware ?
Are there specific features required (in the motherboard or cpu) ?
Ideally I would like a system with an Intel Skylake CPU and a dGPU (Nano) - would you have any recommendation to make about supported motherboard ?
The Z97-PRO motherboard said to work is not compatible with newer CPUs.
Thanks for your help
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: