Major API refactoring #25
Conversation
GabrielBarberini
requested review from
luimot,
Gui-FernandesBR,
lucasfourier,
MateusStano and
phmbressan
This comment was marked as spam.
This comment was marked as spam.
![coderabbitai[bot]](https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/in/347564?s=60&v=4){kind=small}
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 5
Outside diff range, codebase verification and nitpick comments (1)
lib/views/flight.py (1)
8-156: LGTM, but consider improving type hints and addressing TODO comments.The
FlightSummaryclass combines functionalities fromRocketSummaryandEnvSummary, which promotes a modular design. The numerous optional attributes provide flexibility in representing flight data. The code changes are approved.However, consider the following improvements:
- Replace
Anytype hints with more specific types where possible to enhance type safety and readability.- Address the TODO comments to improve the functionality of the class, such as implementing the mentioned summary routes and handling the
Callablecase forAnytype hints.
Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
Files ignored due to path filters (2)
lib/data/calisto/powerOffDragCurve.csvis excluded by!**/*.csvlib/data/calisto/powerOnDragCurve.csvis excluded by!**/*.csv
Files selected for processing (35)
- Dockerfile (2 hunks)
- README.md (6 hunks)
- lib/init.py (1 hunks)
- lib/main.py (1 hunks)
- lib/api.py (3 hunks)
- lib/controllers/environment.py (13 hunks)
- lib/controllers/flight.py (16 hunks)
- lib/controllers/motor.py (13 hunks)
- lib/controllers/rocket.py (14 hunks)
- lib/models/aerosurfaces.py (1 hunks)
- lib/models/environment.py (2 hunks)
- lib/models/flight.py (1 hunks)
- lib/models/motor.py (1 hunks)
- lib/models/rocket.py (1 hunks)
- lib/repositories/environment.py (5 hunks)
- lib/repositories/flight.py (5 hunks)
- lib/repositories/motor.py (5 hunks)
- lib/repositories/repo.py (3 hunks)
- lib/repositories/rocket.py (4 hunks)
- lib/routes/environment.py (2 hunks)
- lib/routes/flight.py (5 hunks)
- lib/routes/motor.py (3 hunks)
- lib/routes/rocket.py (4 hunks)
- lib/services/environment.py (1 hunks)
- lib/services/flight.py (1 hunks)
- lib/services/motor.py (1 hunks)
- lib/services/rocket.py (1 hunks)
- lib/settings/gunicorn.py (1 hunks)
- lib/utils.py (1 hunks)
- lib/views/environment.py (2 hunks)
- lib/views/flight.py (2 hunks)
- lib/views/motor.py (2 hunks)
- lib/views/rocket.py (2 hunks)
- pyproject.toml (2 hunks)
- requirements.txt (1 hunks)
Files skipped from review due to trivial changes (1)
- lib/main.py
Additional context used
Ruff
lib/__init__.py
28-28:
lib.api.appimported but unused; consider removing, adding to__all__, or using a redundant alias(F401)
lib/services/rocket.py
243-243: Within an
exceptclause, raise exceptions withraise ... from errorraise ... from Noneto distinguish them from errors in exception handling(B904)
271-273: Within an
exceptclause, raise exceptions withraise ... from errorraise ... from Noneto distinguish them from errors in exception handling(B904)
Additional comments not posted (139)
requirements.txt (3)
2-2: LGTM!The addition of the
dillpackage aligns with the PR objective of migrating from jsonpickle to dill binaries for serialization. It's a reasonable change.
5-5: LGTM!Specifying the exact version of
pydantichelps ensure compatibility and reproducibility across different environments. It's a good practice.
13-13: Please provide more context on the added packages.The addition of
opentelemetry.instrumentation.requestsandtenacitysuggests an expansion of the project's capabilities, possibly for enhanced observability and retry mechanisms.However, more information is needed to determine if these packages are necessary and how they will be utilized in the codebase.
Could you please provide more context on the purpose and planned usage of these packages?
Also applies to: 16-16
lib/models/flight.py (2)
6-6: Justify the decision to makeFlightinstances mutable.The removal of the
frozen=Trueparameter from theFlightclass is a significant change that affects the immutability ofFlightinstances. It allows for modifications to instance attributes after creation, which could lead to unintended consequences and make the code more error-prone.Please provide a justification for making
Flightinstances mutable. What are the specific use cases that require this change?Also, consider the potential risks and ensure that appropriate safeguards are in place to prevent unintended modifications to
Flightinstances throughout the codebase.
Line range hint
6-12: Clarify the handling of unique identifiers forFlightinstances.The removal of the
flight_idproperty method eliminates the built-in way to retrieve a unique identifier forFlightinstances. This could impact functionality that relies on unique identifiers for tracking, comparison, or other purposes.Please clarify how unique identifiers for
Flightinstances will be handled after removing theflight_idproperty. Are there alternative mechanisms in place to generate and manage unique identifiers forFlightinstances?Ensure that the removal of this property does not break any existing functionality that depends on unique identifiers.
lib/models/environment.py (2)
6-6: Justify the decision to makeEnvinstances mutable.The removal of the
frozen=Trueparameter from theEnvclass is a significant change that affects the immutability ofEnvinstances. It allows for modifications to instance attributes after creation, which could lead to unintended consequences and make the code more error-prone.Please provide a justification for making
Envinstances mutable. What are the specific use cases that require this change?Also, consider the potential risks and ensure that appropriate safeguards are in place to prevent unintended modifications to
Envinstances throughout the codebase.
Line range hint
6-17: Clarify the handling of unique identifiers forEnvinstances.The removal of the
env_idproperty method eliminates the built-in way to retrieve a unique identifier forEnvinstances. This could impact functionality that relies on unique identifiers for tracking, comparison, or other purposes.Please clarify how unique identifiers for
Envinstances will be handled after removing theenv_idproperty. Are there alternative mechanisms in place to generate and manage unique identifiers forEnvinstances?Ensure that the removal of this property does not break any existing functionality that depends on unique identifiers.
lib/settings/gunicorn.py (1)
10-10: LGTM!The service version update from "1.2.0" to "2.0.0" is approved.
Dockerfile (2)
1-1: LGTM!The Python version upgrade from 3.11 to 3.12.5 is approved.
19-19: Verify if the timeout increase aligns with the application's requirements.The timeout parameter has been increased from 30 to 35 seconds. While this change allows for longer processing times, it's important to ensure that it aligns with the expected response times of the application.
Please confirm that the increased timeout value is suitable for the application's workload and does not introduce any unintended consequences.
lib/__init__.py (1)
25-25: LGTM!The change in the error message format is approved.
lib/models/aerosurfaces.py (4)
5-9: LGTM!The changes to the
RailButtonsclass are approved:
- Removing
frozen=Trueto allow mutable instances.- Adding the
nameattribute to enhance the descriptive capabilities.
12-18: LGTM!The changes to the
NoseConeclass are approved:
- Removing
frozen=Trueto allow mutable instances.- Adding the
nameattribute to enhance the descriptive capabilities.- Removing the default values to require explicit values upon instantiation.
21-23: LGTM!The addition of the
FinsKindsclass is approved. It introduces a more structured way to categorize fins, enhancing the model's functionality.
26-36: LGTM!The changes to the
Finsclass are approved:
- Removing
frozen=Trueto allow mutable instances.- Adding the
nameattribute to enhance the descriptive capabilities.- Removing the default values to require explicit values upon instantiation.
- Adding the
fins_kindattribute to introduce a more structured way to categorize fins.pyproject.toml (2)
10-10: Verify the version bump.The version has been bumped from "1.2.0" to "2.0.0", which indicates a major release that may include breaking changes or substantial new features.
Ensure that the changes in this PR justify a major version bump and that the necessary documentation and migration guides are provided.
47-53: Verify the pylint configuration changes.The list of disabled pylint checks has been altered:
- Checks such as
line-too-long,duplicate-code, andtoo-many-instance-attributeshave been reintroduced.- Checks like
missing-module-docstring,missing-function-docstring, andtoo-many-public-methodsremain disabled.Ensure that the changes align with the project's coding standards and priorities.
lib/views/rocket.py (3)
45-45: LGTM!Renaming the attribute from
new_rocket_idto a more genericrocket_idis approved. It simplifies the interface and may improve consistency across the codebase.
50-50: LGTM!Renaming the attribute from
deleted_rocket_idto a more genericrocket_idis approved. It simplifies the interface and may improve consistency across the codebase.
54-55: LGTM!The addition of the
RocketViewclass is approved:
- It indicates a further refinement in how rocket and motor data are represented and accessed.
- Inheriting from
Rocketsuggests thatRocketViewis a specialized view of a rocket.- Including the
motorattribute of typeMotorViewindicates a composition relationship betweenRocketViewandMotorView.lib/services/environment.py (4)
14-15: LGTM!The code changes are approved.
17-34: LGTM!The code changes are approved.
44-54: LGTM!The code changes are approved.
56-63: LGTM!The code changes are approved.
lib/views/environment.py (3)
55-56: LGTM!The code changes are approved.
60-61: LGTM!The code changes are approved.
6-46: Verify the usage ofAnyand dill binary objects.The TODO comment indicates that
Anyis used to bypass Pydantic parsing and expects a dill binary object. Please ensure this aligns with the intended behavior and doesn't introduce any potential issues.LGTM for the addition of new optional attributes!
The addition of new optional attributes enhances the flexibility of the
EnvSummarymodel.lib/services/flight.py (4)
17-18: LGTM!The code changes are approved.
20-39: LGTM!The code changes are approved.
49-58: LGTM!The code changes are approved.
60-67: LGTM!The code changes are approved.
lib/models/rocket.py (2)
14-16: LGTM!The code changes are approved.
28-85: LGTM!The code changes are approved.
The changes enhance the flexibility of the
Rocketclass by allowing for multiple parachutes and detailed configurations for each component. The changes reflect a shift towards a more modular and configurable design for theRocketclass, enhancing its usability and adaptability for different rocket configurations.lib/routes/environment.py (3)
69-97: LGTM!The code changes are approved.
The function enhances the API's capability to handle different types of environment data, specifically by allowing users to download a binary file.
100-109: LGTM!The code changes are approved.
The function now utilizes a different controller method to fetch the simulation data, aligning with the updated logic.
112-121: LGTM!The code changes are approved.
lib/views/motor.py (4)
6-69: LGTM!The code changes are approved.
The changes reflect a substantial enhancement in the data model related to motors, providing a more detailed and flexible structure for representing motor characteristics and behaviors.
76-79: LGTM!The code changes are approved.
The attribute name change standardizes the naming convention across these classes, aligning them with the new structure introduced in
MotorSummary.
82-84: LGTM!The code changes are approved.
The attribute name change standardizes the naming convention across these classes, aligning them with the new structure introduced in
MotorSummary.
87-88: LGTM!The code changes are approved.
The addition suggests an enhancement in the way motor types are managed or displayed, potentially allowing for more specific interactions with different motor kinds.
lib/routes/motor.py (5)
40-41: LGTM!The code changes are approved.
45-45: LGTM!The code changes are approved.
70-71: LGTM!The code changes are approved.
74-103: LGTM!The code changes are approved.
105-106: LGTM!The code changes are approved.
lib/routes/rocket.py (6)
Line range hint
34-44: LGTM!The code changes are approved.
48-48: LGTM!The code changes are approved.
70-76: LGTM!The code changes are approved.
79-106: LGTM!The code changes are approved.
110-116: LGTM!The code changes are approved.
122-131: LGTM!The code changes are approved.
lib/api.py (3)
Line range hint
44-69: LGTM!The code changes are approved.
11-13: LGTM!The code changes are approved.
37-39: LGTM!The code changes are approved.
lib/models/motor.py (5)
9-9: LGTM!The addition of the
GENERICenum value toMotorKindsis approved.
20-22: LGTM!The addition of the
CoordinateSystemOrientationenum class is approved.
25-25: LGTM!The removal of the
frozen=Trueattribute fromTankFluidsis approved.
30-30: LGTM!The changes to the
MotorTankclass are approved:
- The removal of the
frozen=Trueattribute.- The default values for
gasandliquidattributes.- The change of
flux_timefrom a list to a tuple.- The initialization of
gas_mass_flow_rate_inandliquid_mass_flow_rate_into0.0.Also applies to: 36-38, 50-52
69-69: LGTM!The changes to the
Motorclass are approved:
- The change of
thrust_sourcefromMotorEnginestoList[List[float]].- The addition of new parameters related to the chamber dimensions and propellant mass.
- The update of
coordinate_system_orientationto use the newCoordinateSystemOrientationenum.- The simplification of the constructor by removing the motor kind parameter and introducing a
set_motor_kindmethod.- The initialization of
_motor_kindwith a default value ofMotorKinds.SOLID.Also applies to: 77-81, 100-102, 106-106, 112-113
lib/repositories/environment.py (4)
17-17: LGTM!The changes to the
__init__method are approved:
- The addition of an optional
environmentparameter of typeEnv.- The direct initialization of the
_envattribute using theenvironmentparameter.Also applies to: 19-19
81-81: LGTM!The changes to the
get_env_by_idmethod are approved:
- The update to the return type to
Self.- The refinement of error handling to catch specific exceptions
PyMongoErrorandRepositoryNotInitializedException.Also applies to: 92-95
123-142: LGTM!The addition of the
update_env_by_idmethod is approved:
- It allows for updating an existing environment in the database, enhancing the functionality of the
EnvRepositoryclass.- It follows a consistent error handling pattern, catching specific exceptions
PyMongoErrorandRepositoryNotInitializedException.
39-57: LGTM!The remaining changes in the file are approved:
- The refactoring of the
insert_env,find_env, anddelete_envmethods to utilize aget_collectionmethod.- The capture of the inserted document's ID in the
insert_envmethod and assigning it toself.env_id.- The refinement of error handling in the
create_envanddelete_env_by_idmethods to catch specific exceptionsPyMongoErrorandRepositoryNotInitializedException.Also applies to: 41-41, 70-73, 112-115
lib/routes/flight.py (2)
36-36: LGTM!The changes to the
create_flightfunction are approved:
- The removal of the
rocket_optionparameter.- The direct setting of the motor kind on the flight's rocket object.
Also applies to: 45-45
50-50: LGTM!The change to the
read_flightfunction is approved:
- The update to the return type from
FlighttoFlightView.lib/repositories/motor.py (12)
1-1: LGTM!The import is necessary for using the
Selftype hint in the file.
2-2: LGTM!The import is necessary for using the
ObjectIdtype in the file.
3-3: LGTM!The import is necessary for handling
PyMongoErrorexceptions in the file.
17-17: LGTM!The change to the
__init__method to accept an optionalmotorparameter is a good improvement as it allows initializing the repository with a specific motor instance.
19-19: LGTM!The change to set the
_motorattribute to the value of themotorparameter is necessary to store the motor instance in the repository.
32-32: LGTM!The change to return the string representation of the
_motor_idattribute is necessary to ensure that themotor_idproperty returns a string.
39-43: LGTM!The refactoring of the
insert_motormethod to use theget_collectionmethod and directly capture the inserted ID improves the code readability and maintainability.
44-49: LGTM!The addition of the
update_motormethod to update a motor in the database is a good improvement to the repository. The method follows a similar structure to the existing methods.
52-53: LGTM!The refactoring of the
find_motormethod to use theget_collectionmethod improves the code readability and maintainability.
56-58: LGTM!The refactoring of the
delete_motormethod to use theget_collectionmethod improves the code readability and maintainability.
60-77: LGTM!The simplification of the
create_motormethod to remove themotor_kindargument and directly use themotor_kindfrom themotorinstance enhances the clarity of the method. The improved error handling to specifically catchPyMongoErrorandRepositoryNotInitializedExceptionexceptions is also a good change.
Line range hint
82-148: LGTM!The changes to the
get_motor_by_idmethod to returnSelfinstead ofMotorand improve the error handling by specifically catchingPyMongoErrorandRepositoryNotInitializedExceptionexceptions are good improvements. The addition of theupdate_motor_by_idmethod to update a motor in the database by ID is also a good addition to the repository and follows a similar structure to the existing methods.lib/utils.py (2)
10-31: LGTM!The
RocketPyGZipMiddlewareclass is well-structured and based on a proven implementation from the Starlette framework. The code changes are approved.
34-124: LGTM!The
GZipResponderclass is well-structured and based on a proven implementation from the Starlette framework. The code changes are approved.lib/repositories/repo.py (3)
18-23: LGTM!The
RepositoryNotInitializedExceptionclass is well-structured and provides a clear error message. The code changes are approved.
26-40: LGTM!The
RepoInstancesclass is well-structured and encapsulates related data and behavior. The code changes are approved.
Line range hint
48-166: LGTM, but verify the repository initialization and accessibility.The changes to the
Repositoryclass improve thread safety and initialization handling. The refactored code is more modular and easier to understand. The new properties and methods provide a cleaner interface for accessing the MongoDB client and collection. The code changes are approved.However, ensure that the repository is properly initialized and accessible before using it in the application.
Run the following script to verify the repository initialization and accessibility:
lib/views/flight.py (3)
165-166: LGTM!The change to standardize the naming of the
flight_idattribute improves clarity and consistency. The code changes are approved.
170-171: LGTM!The change to standardize the naming of the
flight_idattribute improves clarity and consistency. The code changes are approved.
174-175: LGTM!The
FlightViewclass provides a useful abstraction layer that encapsulates rocket-specific details within the flight context. This promotes a cleaner separation of concerns and improves code organization. The code changes are approved.lib/services/motor.py (4)
25-26: LGTM!The
__init__method is correctly implemented and follows best practices.
28-129: LGTM!The
from_motor_modelmethod correctly converts theMotormodel to the correspondingRocketPyMotorobject. It handles the different motor kinds and their specific attributes. The code is well-structured and readable.
131-137: LGTM!The
motorproperty and setter methods are correctly implemented and follow best practices.
139-148: LGTM!The
get_motor_summarymethod is correctly implemented and provides a convenient way to get the summary of the motor.lib/repositories/flight.py (10)
18-20: LGTM!The change to the constructor facilitates better state management within the repository by allowing initialization with a specific flight instance.
33-33: LGTM!The change to the
flight_idproperty ensures that theflight_idis always returned as a string.
40-43: LGTM!The change to the
insert_flightmethod enhances the integrity of the flight data by setting theflight_idbased on the actual inserted document's ID.
45-50: LGTM!The
update_flightmethod is correctly implemented and follows best practices for updating documents in MongoDB. It uses theObjectIdto ensure proper identification of the flight record during the update.
52-57: LGTM!The
update_envmethod is correctly implemented and follows best practices for updating documents in MongoDB. It uses theObjectIdto ensure proper identification of the flight record during the update.
59-64: LGTM!The
update_rocketmethod is correctly implemented and follows best practices for updating documents in MongoDB. It uses theObjectIdto ensure proper identification of the flight record during the update.
67-68: LGTM!The change to the
find_flightmethod aligns with MongoDB's best practices for document identification by using the_idfield instead of theflight_id.
71-72: LGTM!The change to the
delete_flightmethod aligns with MongoDB's best practices for document identification by using the_idfield instead of theflight_id.
75-97: LGTM!The changes to the
create_flightmethod improve its robustness and readability. The method has been simplified, unnecessary parameters have been removed, and specific exceptions are now caught and re-raised. The enhanced logging statements provide clearer insights into the operations being performed.
Line range hint
99-123: LGTM!The changes to the
get_flight_by_idmethod enhance clarity, reduce potential errors, and improve its usability. The method now directly returns the flight object fetched from the repository, catches specific exceptions, and provides enhanced logging. The return type change toSelfallows for method chaining.lib/controllers/environment.py (2)
Line range hint
49-72: LGTM!The changes to the
create_envmethod improve error handling by catchingPyMongoErrorexceptions and logging errors more effectively. Retrieving the environment ID from the repository after creating an environment ensures that the correct ID is returned.
Line range hint
92-120: LGTM!The changes to the
get_env_by_idmethod enhance clarity by directly returning the environment object fetched from the repository. The improved error handling, including catchingPyMongoErrorexceptions and more effective logging, makes the method more robust.lib/controllers/motor.py (6)
3-3: LGTM!The code changes are approved.
7-7: LGTM!The code changes are approved.
14-14: LGTM!The code changes are approved.
29-30: LGTM!The code changes are approved.
42-46: LGTM!The code changes are approved.
62-69: LGTM!The code changes are approved.
Also applies to: 80-80, 87-89, 105-113, 124-128, 139-144, 156-157, 170-170, 173-173, 192-201, 210-210, 235-242, 251-251
lib/controllers/rocket.py (8)
4-4: LGTM!The code changes are approved.
7-8: LGTM!The code changes are approved.
11-11: LGTM!The code changes are approved.
17-17: LGTM!The code changes are approved.
36-36: LGTM!The code changes are approved.
Also applies to: 47-49
59-66: LGTM!The code changes are approved.
Also applies to: 77-77, 80-80, 86-86, 102-113, 121-131, 142-144, 158-159, 172-172, 175-175, 194-201, 212-212, 237-242, 253-253
277-279: LGTM!The code changes are approved.
1-1: Verify the impact of removing methods.Several methods related to the creation of rocket components (like nose cones, fins, and parachutes) have been removed from the
RocketControllerclass. This indicates a potential shift in how these components are managed or instantiated, possibly moving to a service-oriented architecture.Please ensure that the removal of these methods does not break any existing functionality in the codebase. Consider running the following script to search for any potential usage of these methods:
Verification successful
Methods have been moved, not removed.
The methods
get_rocketpy_nose,get_rocketpy_finset,get_rocketpy_tail,get_rocketpy_parachute, andcheck_parachute_triggerhave been relocated tolib/services/rocket.pyand are still in use. This indicates a restructuring of the codebase rather than a removal of functionality. The existing functionality should remain unaffected.
lib/services/rocket.py: Contains the relocated methods.lib/views/rocket.py: Referencescheck_parachute_trigger.Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Search for potential usage of removed methods. # Test: Search for the method names in the codebase. # Expect: No occurrences of the method names. methods=( "get_rocketpy_nose" "get_rocketpy_finset" "get_rocketpy_tail" "get_rocketpy_parachute" "check_parachute_trigger" ) for method in "${methods[@]}"; do echo "Searching for $method..." rg --type python "$method" doneLength of output: 1058
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Search for potential usage of removed methods without specifying file type. # Test: Search for the method names in the codebase. # Expect: No occurrences of the method names. methods=( "get_rocketpy_nose" "get_rocketpy_finset" "get_rocketpy_tail" "get_rocketpy_parachute" "check_parachute_trigger" ) for method in "${methods[@]}"; do echo "Searching for $method..." rg "$method" doneLength of output: 1760
lib/services/rocket.py (1)
1-285: LGTM!The implementation of the
RocketServiceclass is well-structured and follows best practices for error handling and logging. The class encapsulates the logic for creating and managing rocket components, which improves the modularity and maintainability of the codebase. The code is also well-documented with docstrings and comments, making it easier to understand and maintain.Tools
Ruff
243-243: Within an
exceptclause, raise exceptions withraise ... from errorraise ... from Noneto distinguish them from errors in exception handling(B904)
271-273: Within an
exceptclause, raise exceptions withraise ... from errorraise ... from Noneto distinguish them from errors in exception handling(B904)
lib/controllers/flight.py (8)
3-3: LGTM!The new import statements are necessary for the refactored code and are approved.
Also applies to: 7-12
46-47: LGTM!The changes to the
__init__method, including the removal of unnecessary parameters and the addition of theguardmethod, are approved. These changes improve the code by reducing complexity and enhancing validation.
58-59: LGTM!The new
guardmethod is a valuable addition to theFlightControllerclass. It ensures the integrity of the flight object by validating the associated rocket, which is a good practice to prevent potential issues.
69-78: LGTM!The modifications to the
create_flightmethod are approved. The changes, including the direct use of theFlightRepository, the simplified return value, and the enhanced error handling, improve the code by reducing complexity, potential errors, and improving robustness.Also applies to: 87-87, 90-90
94-96: LGTM!The updates to the
get_flight_by_idmethod are approved. The changes, including returning aFlightViewobject, enhanced error handling, and the construction of theFlightViewobject, improve the code by providing a more structured response format, improving robustness, and providing a cleaner and more consistent way of returning flight data.Also applies to: 112-122, 131-144
155-158: LGTM!The refactoring of the
get_rocketpy_flight_binarymethod is approved. The changes, including the rename, the shift from JSON to binary format, and the use of theFlightServicefor generating the binary representation, improve the separation of concerns and encapsulate the logic within the service layer. This aligns with the broader architectural improvements in the codebase.Also applies to: 160-160, 166-166, 172-173, 179-179, 186-186, 189-189
208-217: LGTM!The refactoring of the
update_flight_by_id,update_env_by_flight_id, andupdate_rocket_by_flight_idmethods is approved. The changes, including streamlining operations, focusing on updating the flight object directly, utilizing the repository for database interactions, consistent return values, and enhanced error handling, improve the code by reducing redundancy, improving error handling, clarifying responsibilities, providing cleaner and more predictable responses, and improving robustness.Also applies to: 226-226, 250-261, 272-272, 280-280, 296-307, 318-318
383-385: LGTM!The updates to the
simulate_flightmethod are approved. The changes, including the use of theFlightServicefor generating flight summaries and the retrieval of the flight using theget_flight_by_idmethod, align with the broader architectural improvements in the codebase. This improves the separation of concerns and encapsulates the logic within the service layer.lib/repositories/rocket.py (10)
18-21: LGTM!The changes to the constructor are approved. Allowing initialization with a specific
Rocketinstance can be beneficial in certain use cases.
33-33: LGTM!The change to the
rocket_idproperty is approved. Returning a string representation ensures type consistency.
40-44: LGTM!The changes to the
insert_rocketmethod are approved. Using theget_collectionmethod improves code readability, and capturing the inserted ID directly from the result is a cleaner approach.
45-49: LGTM!The changes to the
update_rocketmethod are approved. Using theget_collectionmethod improves code readability, and usingObjectIdensures proper matching of therocket_idin the database.
53-54: LGTM!The changes to the
find_rocketmethod are approved. Using theget_collectionmethod improves code readability, and usingObjectIdensures proper matching of therocket_idin the database.
57-58: LGTM!The changes to the
delete_rocketmethod are approved. Using theget_collectionmethod improves code readability, and usingObjectIdensures proper matching of therocket_idin the database.
61-79: LGTM!The changes to the
create_rocketmethod are approved. Using theinsert_rocketmethod simplifies the code and improves readability. Explicitly catching and raising specific exceptions improves error handling and propagation.
Line range hint
85-109: LGTM!The changes to the
get_rocket_by_idmethod are approved. Using thefind_rocketmethod simplifies the code and improves readability. Explicitly catching and raising specific exceptions improves error handling and propagation. Assigning the parsed rocket to therocketattribute allows easy access to the retrieved rocket.
120-123: LGTM!The changes to the exception handling in the
delete_rocket_by_idmethod are approved. Explicitly catching and raising specific exceptions improves error handling and propagation.
131-153: LGTM!The new
update_rocket_by_idmethod is approved. It provides a convenient way to update a rocket by its ID, using the existingupdate_rocketmethod for consistency. Explicitly catching and raising specific exceptions improves error handling and propagation.README.md (5)
12-16: LGTM!The addition of the "Development" section is approved. It provides clear instructions for code formatting and linting, which helps maintain a consistent code style and improves code quality. The specified tools (
black,pylint, andflake8) are widely used in Python projects.
26-26: LGTM!The renaming of the "Standard" section to "Standalone" is approved. The new name is more descriptive and clearly conveys that the server can be run independently.
46-51: LGTM!The addition of the "services" directory to the file structure is approved. Having a dedicated directory for services can improve code organization and maintainability by better separating concerns and functionalities.
90-93: LGTM!The renaming of the test files in the "test_controllers" directory is approved. Including "controller" in the file names improves clarity and maintainability by making it clear which tests correspond to the controller components. The consistent naming convention enhances readability.
95-99: LGTM!The addition of the "test_services" directory and its test files is approved. Having a dedicated directory for service tests improves code organization and maintainability. The consistent naming convention of the test files makes it clear which tests correspond to which service components.
extends opentelemetry instrumentation properly threat mongo db errors refactors environment summary serialization Minor refactoring - Enhances error handling and logging - Fine tune hybrid locks on main repository initialization and finalization refactor repositories accesses fine tunes db config turn off db connection close fixes repo name fixes get environment call on flight route
- wipe business logic from controllers - turn off entities deletion - replace hash ids by ObjectIds disables simulation routes exposes motor tank property and disable fronzen instances
fixes summary routes migrates from jsonpickle to dill binary pin pydantic version to ensure compatibility; upgrades python base image implements generic motor; removes rocket_options; fixes binary output addresses PR review increases response timeout; minor refactor on importing statements; fix parachute trigger evaluation context fixes pylint issues Updates pylint python version
GabrielBarberini
force-pushed
the
refactor
branch
from
d8d5a27
to
57d0a69
Compare
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 3
Outside diff range and nitpick comments (4)
pyproject.toml (1)
47-53: Approve: Pylint configuration changes reflect updated code quality standards.The changes to the pylint configuration align with the project's updated code quality standards and priorities. Enabling checks like
line-too-long,duplicate-code, andtoo-many-instance-attributeswill help maintain code consistency and readability.However, consider the following suggestions:
- Re-enable the
missing-module-docstringandmissing-function-docstringchecks to ensure proper documentation of modules and functions.- Review the disabled
too-many-public-methodscheck and consider refactoring classes with too many public methods to improve code organization and maintainability.lib/models/rocket.py (1)
28-85: LGTM, with a minor suggestion.The code changes are approved. The changes enhance the flexibility and modularity of the
Rocketclass by allowing for multiple parachutes and detailed configurations for each component.One minor suggestion:
Consider adding type hints for the
power_off_dragandpower_on_dragattributes to improve code readability and maintainability. For example:power_off_drag: List[Tuple[float, float]] = [ (0.0, 0.0), (0.1, 0.1), (0.2, 0.2), ] power_on_drag: List[Tuple[float, float]] = [ (0.0, 0.0), (0.1, 0.1), (0.2, 0.2), ]lib/views/motor.py (2)
8-69: Comprehensive motor data representation!The addition of the extensive set of optional attributes in the
MotorSummaryclass provides a comprehensive representation of motor data, allowing for flexibility in handling missing data.However, consider using more specific types instead of
Anyfor the attributes where possible. This will improve type safety, code clarity, and help avoid potential issues with serialization and deserialization.
87-88: NewMotorViewclass for motor kind management!The addition of the
MotorViewclass, which extends theMotorclass and introduces theselected_motor_kindattribute of typeMotorKinds, suggests an enhancement in the management or display of motor types, potentially allowing for more specific interactions with different motor kinds.To improve code clarity and maintainability, consider adding a docstring to the
MotorViewclass to explain its purpose and usage.
Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
Files ignored due to path filters (2)
lib/data/calisto/powerOffDragCurve.csvis excluded by!**/*.csvlib/data/calisto/powerOnDragCurve.csvis excluded by!**/*.csv
Files selected for processing (36)
- .github/workflows/pylint.yml (1 hunks)
- Dockerfile (2 hunks)
- README.md (6 hunks)
- lib/init.py (1 hunks)
- lib/main.py (1 hunks)
- lib/api.py (3 hunks)
- lib/controllers/environment.py (13 hunks)
- lib/controllers/flight.py (16 hunks)
- lib/controllers/motor.py (13 hunks)
- lib/controllers/rocket.py (14 hunks)
- lib/models/aerosurfaces.py (1 hunks)
- lib/models/environment.py (2 hunks)
- lib/models/flight.py (1 hunks)
- lib/models/motor.py (1 hunks)
- lib/models/rocket.py (1 hunks)
- lib/repositories/environment.py (5 hunks)
- lib/repositories/flight.py (5 hunks)
- lib/repositories/motor.py (5 hunks)
- lib/repositories/repo.py (3 hunks)
- lib/repositories/rocket.py (4 hunks)
- lib/routes/environment.py (2 hunks)
- lib/routes/flight.py (5 hunks)
- lib/routes/motor.py (3 hunks)
- lib/routes/rocket.py (4 hunks)
- lib/services/environment.py (1 hunks)
- lib/services/flight.py (1 hunks)
- lib/services/motor.py (1 hunks)
- lib/services/rocket.py (1 hunks)
- lib/settings/gunicorn.py (1 hunks)
- lib/utils.py (1 hunks)
- lib/views/environment.py (2 hunks)
- lib/views/flight.py (2 hunks)
- lib/views/motor.py (2 hunks)
- lib/views/rocket.py (2 hunks)
- pyproject.toml (2 hunks)
- requirements.txt (1 hunks)
Files skipped from review due to trivial changes (2)
- .github/workflows/pylint.yml
- lib/settings/gunicorn.py
Files skipped from review as they are similar to previous changes (17)
- Dockerfile
- lib/main.py
- lib/api.py
- lib/controllers/environment.py
- lib/controllers/flight.py
- lib/controllers/rocket.py
- lib/models/environment.py
- lib/models/flight.py
- lib/repositories/motor.py
- lib/routes/motor.py
- lib/routes/rocket.py
- lib/services/environment.py
- lib/services/flight.py
- lib/services/motor.py
- lib/services/rocket.py
- lib/utils.py
- requirements.txt
Additional context used
Ruff
lib/__init__.py
28-28:
lib.api.appimported but unused; consider removing, adding to__all__, or using a redundant alias(F401)
Additional comments not posted (88)
lib/__init__.py (1)
25-25: Verify the impact of the error message format change.The change to the
parse_errorfunction alters the format of the returned error message by removing the word "exception". This may affect how error messages are logged or displayed.Please ensure this change is thoroughly tested to confirm it behaves as expected and does not negatively impact error handling or debugging processes. Consider searching the codebase for usage of the
parse_errorfunction to assess the scope of impact.Run the following script to verify the
parse_errorfunction usage:lib/models/aerosurfaces.py (5)
5-9: LGTM!The
RailButtonsclass looks good. It follows the Pydantic model structure and captures the essential properties of rail buttons.
12-18: LGTM!The
NoseConeclass looks good. It follows the Pydantic model structure and captures the essential properties of nose cones.
21-23: LGTM!The
FinsKindsenumeration class provides a structured way to categorize fins, enhancing the model's functionality. It follows the Python enum structure.
26-36: LGTM!The
Finsclass looks good. It follows the Pydantic model structure and captures the essential properties of fins. The inclusion of thefins_kindattribute enhances the model's functionality by categorizing the fins.
44-50: LGTM!The
Tailclass looks good. It follows the Pydantic model structure and captures the essential properties of tails.pyproject.toml (1)
10-10: LGTM: Version bump to 2.0.0 for major API refactoring.The version change from 1.2.0 to 2.0.0 aligns with the significant changes introduced in this PR, such as the API refactoring, database connection pooling, and migration to MongoDB's ObjectID.
lib/views/rocket.py (5)
7-36: The TODO comment was already flagged in the previous review and an issue was opened to track its resolution. Skipping the generation of a duplicate comment.
Line range hint
38-40: LGTM!The code changes are approved.
43-46: LGTM!The code changes are approved. The attribute name change from
new_rocket_idtorocket_idimproves consistency.
49-51: LGTM!The code changes are approved. The attribute name change from
deleted_rocket_idtorocket_idimproves consistency.
54-55: LGTM!The code changes are approved. The inheritance from
Rocketand themotorattribute of typeMotorViewindicate a refinement in how rocket and motor data are represented and accessed.lib/views/environment.py (4)
5-46: Comprehensive and flexible data model.The
EnvSummaryclass provides a detailed and flexible data model for environmental summaries by defining a wide range of optional attributes. This allows for partial data and accommodates various environmental parameters.
54-56: LGTM!The changes to the
EnvUpdatedclass are approved as they simplify the interface for updating environments and ensure consistency by standardizing the naming of theenv_idfield.
59-61: LGTM!The changes to the
EnvDeletedclass are approved as they simplify the interface for deleting environments and ensure consistency by standardizing the naming of theenv_idfield.
6-6: Verify the usage ofAnytype forCallableobjects.The TODO comment suggests that
Anytype might be used forCallableobjects, which could lead to unexpected behavior. This requires further investigation and verification.To verify the usage of
Anytype forCallableobjects, run the following script:lib/models/rocket.py (2)
14-16: LGTM!The code changes are approved.
19-26: LGTM!The code changes are approved.
lib/routes/environment.py (3)
80-97: LGTM!The new
read_rocketpy_envfunction is implemented correctly and follows best practices for returning a binary response. It uses theEnvController.get_rocketpy_env_binarymethod to fetch the binary data, which is a good separation of concerns. The function is also instrumented with OpenTelemetry for tracing.
101-109: LGTM!The renamed
simulate_envfunction is implemented correctly and follows the existing pattern of using theEnvControllerto fetch data. The function is also instrumented with OpenTelemetry for tracing.
113-121: LGTM!The renamed
delete_envfunction is implemented correctly and follows the existing pattern of using theEnvControllerto perform operations. The function is also instrumented with OpenTelemetry for tracing.lib/views/motor.py (3)
Line range hint
72-74:
78-78: Improved naming consistency!The renaming of the attribute from
new_motor_idtomotor_idin theMotorUpdatedclass aligns the naming convention with theMotorDeletedclass, improving consistency across the codebase.
83-83: Improved naming consistency!The renaming of the attribute from
deleted_motor_idtomotor_idin theMotorDeletedclass aligns the naming convention with theMotorUpdatedclass, improving consistency across the codebase.lib/models/motor.py (5)
9-9: LGTM!The code changes are approved.
20-22: LGTM!The code changes are approved.
25-27: Verify the removal of thefrozenattribute.The removal of the
frozenattribute is a significant change that allows for mutable instances of the class. This change should be carefully reviewed to ensure that it aligns with the intended design and does not introduce any unintended side effects or bugs.Please provide more context on the reasoning behind this change and confirm that it has been thoroughly tested to ensure that it behaves as expected.
30-64: Verify the removal of thefrozenattribute and confirm the default values.
- The removal of the
frozenattribute is a significant change that allows for mutable instances of the class. This change should be carefully reviewed to ensure that it aligns with the intended design and does not introduce any unintended side effects or bugs.Please provide more context on the reasoning behind this change and confirm that it has been thoroughly tested to ensure that it behaves as expected.
Changing
flux_timefrom a list to a tuple is a good change as it enforces immutability for this attribute.The default values for
gas,liquid,gas_mass_flow_rate_in, andliquid_mass_flow_rate_inshould be confirmed to ensure they are appropriate for the intended use case.Please confirm that these default values align with the expected behavior of the tank's fluid dynamics.
67-113: Verify the changes tothrust_sourceand test the constructor changes.
- Changing
thrust_sourcefromMotorEnginestoList[List[float]]suggests a more generalized approach to thrust source representation. This change should be reviewed to ensure that it is compatible with the rest of the codebase and does not break any existing functionality.Please provide more context on the reasoning behind this change and confirm that it has been thoroughly tested to ensure compatibility with the rest of the codebase.
Updating
coordinate_system_orientationto use the newCoordinateSystemOrientationenum improves type safety and clarity, which is a positive change.Simplifying the constructor and introducing the
set_motor_kindmethod provides a more dynamic way to manage the motor kind, but the implications of this change should be thoroughly tested.Please confirm that these changes have been thoroughly tested to ensure that they behave as expected and do not introduce any unintended side effects or bugs.
- Initializing
_motor_kindwith a default value ensures that every motor instance has a defined type, which is a good practice.lib/repositories/environment.py (5)
17-19: LGTM!The changes to the constructor are approved. Initializing the
_envattribute directly with the optionalenvironmentparameter streamlines the object creation process.
39-42: LGTM!The changes to the
insert_envmethod are approved:
- Utilizing the
get_collectionmethod improves code readability and maintainability.- Capturing the inserted document's ID enhances the tracking of the environment's identity.
- The refined error handling allows for more precise error management.
52-53: LGTM!The changes to the
find_envmethod are approved:
- Utilizing the
get_collectionmethod improves code readability and maintainability.- The refined error handling allows for more precise error management.
56-57: LGTM!The changes to the
delete_envmethod are approved:
- Utilizing the
get_collectionmethod improves code readability and maintainability.- The refined error handling allows for more precise error management.
123-142: LGTM!The new
update_env_by_idmethod is approved:
- It enhances the functionality of the
EnvRepositoryclass by allowing for updates to existing environments.- The error handling ensures consistency in how exceptions are managed.
lib/routes/flight.py (7)
Line range hint
36-46: LGTM!The changes to the
create_flightfunction are approved:
- Removing the
rocket_optionparameter simplifies the function signature and logic.- Setting the motor kind directly on the flight's rocket object encapsulates the motor kind setting within the flight object, which can enhance clarity and maintainability.
110-129: LGTM!The changes to the
update_flight_rocketfunction are approved:
- Removing the
rocket_optionparameter simplifies the function signature and logic.- Setting the motor kind directly on the rocket object aligns with the changes made in the
create_flightfunction.
132-149: LGTM!The changes to the
update_flightfunction are approved:
- Removing the
rocket_optionparameter simplifies the function signature and logic.- Setting the motor kind directly on the flight's rocket object aligns with the changes made in the
create_flightfunction.
164-173: LGTM!The changes to the
delete_flightfunction are approved:
- Moving the function to a new endpoint is a minor modification and does not affect the functionality.
152-161: LGTM, but verify the simulation functionality.The addition of the
simulate_flightfunction is approved.However, ensure that the simulation functionality is thoroughly tested to confirm that it correctly simulates a flight based on the provided flight ID and returns the expected
FlightSummaryobject.Run the following script to verify the simulation functionality:
50-55: LGTM, but verify the return type change.The changes to the
read_flightfunction are approved.However, ensure that the change in the return type from
FlighttoFlightViewis thoroughly tested to confirm that it provides the expected user-friendly or structured response to the client.Run the following script to verify the return type change:
Verification successful
Return type change verified and consistent across the codebase.
The change in the return type of the
read_flightfunction fromFlighttoFlightViewhas been verified. TheFlightViewclass is correctly used in the codebase, ensuring that the change is integrated properly.
read_flightfunction is defined to returnFlightViewinlib/routes/flight.py.FlightViewis a subclass ofFlight, providing extended functionality.- Usage in
lib/repositories/flight.pyandlib/controllers/flight.pyconfirms correct handling of the return type.Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Verify the return type change from `Flight` to `FlightView`. # Test: Search for the function usage. Expect: Only occurrences of the new return type. rg --type python -A 5 $'read_flight'Length of output: 66
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Correct the file type and verify the return type change from `Flight` to `FlightView`. # Find the definition of `read_flight` to confirm the return type. ast-grep --lang python --pattern $'async def read_flight($_) -> FlightView:' # Search for all usages of `read_flight` in the codebase. rg 'read_flight' --type py -A 5 # Check for any documentation or comments related to `FlightView`. rg 'FlightView' --type py -A 5Length of output: 3025
72-88: LGTM, but verify the binary file download functionality.The changes to the
read_rocketpy_flightfunction are approved.However, ensure that the binary file download functionality is thoroughly tested to confirm that it serves the correct binary file with the appropriate content disposition header.
Run the following script to verify the binary file download functionality:
lib/repositories/rocket.py (6)
18-21: LGTM!The changes to the constructor are approved. Accepting an optional
Rocketinstance and setting the_rocketattribute accordingly improves the initialization of the repository.
33-33: LGTM!The change to the
rocket_idproperty is approved. Returning a string representation of_rocket_idensures type consistency.
40-43: LGTM!The refactoring of the
insert_rocketmethod is approved. Using theget_collectionmethod improves code readability and maintainability. Capturing the inserted ID directly from the result is the correct approach.
53-54: LGTM!The refactoring of the
find_rocketmethod is approved. Using theget_collectionmethod improves code readability and maintainability.
57-58: LGTM!The refactoring of the
delete_rocketmethod is approved. Using theget_collectionmethod improves code readability and maintainability.
131-153: LGTM!The addition of the
update_rocket_by_idmethod is approved. It follows the established patterns in the class and enhances the functionality of the repository by allowing updates to a rocket's details.README.md (9)
12-15: LGTM!The addition of the "Development" section with commands for code formatting and linting is a great improvement. It will help maintain a consistent code style and catch potential issues early in the development process.
26-26: Looks good!The renaming of the "Standard" section to "Standalone" is acceptable. It doesn't have any significant impact on the documentation.
46-51: Great addition!The introduction of the "services" directory in the file structure is a positive change. It suggests a better separation of concerns and aligns with the common practice of having a dedicated layer for business logic and services in the application architecture. This reorganization can improve the maintainability and readability of the codebase.
90-93: Excellent renaming!The renaming of the test files in the "test_controllers" directory to include "controller" in their names is a great improvement. It enhances the readability and maintainability of the test suite by clearly indicating which tests correspond to which components. The consistent naming convention makes it easier to understand the purpose of each test file at a glance.
95-99: Great addition of test files for services!The introduction of the "test_services" directory and its corresponding test files is a valuable addition to the test suite. It aligns with the newly added "services" directory in the main codebase and demonstrates a commitment to maintaining a comprehensive set of tests. Having dedicated test files for service components is crucial for ensuring the correctness and reliability of the service layer.
102-105: Great renaming of route test files!The renaming of the test files in the "test_routes" directory to include "route" in their names is a positive change. It improves the readability and maintainability of the test suite by clearly indicating which tests are associated with the route components. The consistent naming convention across different test directories makes it easier to navigate and understand the purpose of each test file.
108-111: Excellent renaming of repository test files!The renaming of the test files in the "test_repositories" directory to include "repo" in their names is a great improvement. It aligns with the renaming pattern applied to other test directories and enhances the clarity and maintainability of the test suite. The consistent naming convention across different test components makes it straightforward to identify which tests are related to the repository layer of the application.
114-117: Great renaming of model test files!The renaming of the test files in the "test_models" directory to include "model" in their names is a positive change. It adheres to the consistent naming convention applied throughout the test suite and enhances the readability and maintainability of the tests. The clear indication of which tests are associated with the model components of the application makes it easier to navigate and understand the purpose of each test file.
120-123: Excellent renaming of view test files!The renaming of the test files in the "test_views" directory to include "view" in their names is a great improvement. It aligns with the consistent naming convention applied throughout the test suite and enhances the readability and maintainability of the tests. The clear indication of which tests are associated with the view components of the application makes it easier to navigate and understand the purpose of each test file.
lib/repositories/repo.py (7)
18-23: LGTM!The new
RepositoryNotInitializedExceptionclass provides a clear and specific error for cases when the repository is not initialized. This improves error handling and messaging in the codebase.
26-40: LGTM!The new
RepoInstancesclass is used to track repository instances and their prospecting counts. This is part of the changes to improve thread safety in the singleton pattern implementation of theRepositoryclass.
48-61: LGTM!The changes to the
__new__method improve thread safety in the singleton pattern implementation of theRepositoryclass:
- The use of a global thread lock ensures that only one thread can create or access an instance at a time.
- The
_global_instancesdictionary now holdsRepoInstancesobjects, which track both the instance and its prospecting count.
74-79: LGTM!The changes to the constructor of the
Repositoryclass:
- Allow for customization of the maximum pool size for the MongoDB client through the new optional
max_pool_sizeparameter.- Introduce a new instance variable
_initialized_event, which is anasyncio.Event, and call a new method_initialize()at the end of the constructor. These changes are part of handling asynchronous initialization of the repository.
100-107: LGTM!The new
_initialize()method handles the asynchronous initialization of the repository based on the state of the event loop:
- If the event loop is not running, it runs the initialization directly using
asyncio.run().- If the event loop is running, it creates a new task to run the initialization and adds a done callback to handle the completion of the initialization.
Line range hint
123-133: LGTM!The changes to the
_initialize_connectionmethod adjust the connection parameters for the MongoDB client:
maxIdleTimeMSis increased to 30000 to allow idle connections to remain in the pool for a longer time before being closed.minPoolSizeis set to 10 to maintain a minimum number of connections in the pool.maxPoolSizeis set to the value ofself._max_pool_size, which is provided in the constructor, to limit the maximum number of connections in the pool.serverSelectionTimeoutMSis set to 60000 to allow more time for server selection before timing out.
These changes can help optimize connection management and performance.
163-166: LGTM!The new
get_collectionmethod provides a way to access the MongoDB collection associated with the repository:
- It checks if the repository is initialized before returning the collection.
- It raises a
RepositoryNotInitializedExceptionif the repository is not initialized.
This ensures that the collection is only accessed after the repository has been properly initialized.lib/views/flight.py (5)
Line range hint
158-161: LGTM!The code changes are approved.
163-167: LGTM!The code changes are approved. The attribute renaming improves consistency.
169-172: LGTM!The code changes are approved. The attribute renaming improves consistency.
174-175: LGTM!The code changes are approved. The class follows the naming convention of using the
Viewsuffix for classes that represent a view of an entity.
8-156: Verify the inheritance hierarchy, use more specific types, and address missing implementations.
- Inheritance: The
FlightSummaryclass inherits fromRocketSummaryandEnvSummary. Verify that this inheritance hierarchy aligns with the intended design and does not introduce any unintended side effects or conflicts.- Attribute Types: Many attributes are declared as
Optional[Any], which essentially disables type checking for those attributes. While this provides flexibility, it can make the code more prone to runtime errors and harder to maintain. Consider using more specific types where possible.- Missing Implementations: Address the missing implementations indicated by the todo comments to ensure the completeness and correctness of the class.
Run the following script to verify the usage of the
FlightSummaryclass and its attributes:lib/repositories/flight.py (14)
18-20: LGTM!The code changes are approved.
33-33: LGTM!The code changes are approved.
40-43: LGTM!The code changes are approved.
45-50: LGTM!The code changes are approved.
52-57: LGTM!The code changes are approved.
59-64: LGTM!The code changes are approved.
67-68: LGTM!The code changes are approved.
71-72: LGTM!The code changes are approved.
75-97: LGTM!The code changes are approved.
Line range hint
99-123: LGTM!The code changes are approved.
134-143: LGTM!The code changes are approved.
145-167: LGTM!The code changes are approved.
169-188: LGTM!The code changes are approved.
190-212: LGTM!The code changes are approved.
lib/controllers/motor.py (6)
29-31: LGTM!The code changes are approved.
42-46: LGTM!The code changes are approved.
Line range hint
55-83: LGTM!The code changes are approved.
Line range hint
87-137: LGTM!The code changes are approved.
139-174: LGTM!The code changes are approved.
Line range hint
176-214: LGTM!The code changes are approved.
Yes! Since Postman limits collection availability I thought It would be better to get away from it. For now we can stick with /docs for smoke testing. This PR finally formalizes the structure we'll stick with for this project. Which opens the large window for implementing unit tests -which I was avoiding while we were experimenting since requirements were not yet clear/fixed. |
| - black ./lib | ||
| - pylint --extension-pkg-whitelist='pydantic' ./lib/* | ||
| - flake8 --ignore E501,E402,F401,W503 ./lib |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Suggestion to create a Makefile with these commands.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
patched in 470eb1e
lib/models/aerosurfaces.py
Outdated
| name: str | ||
| n: int | ||
| root_chord: float | ||
| tip_chord: float |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
just in case... don't forget the elliptical fins object doesn't have a "tip_chord" attribute. this attribute is exclusive to the trapezoidal.
the future FreeFormFins will also not have this attribute.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Nice catch!
thank you
Patched along with eace9ee
| @@ -3,13 +3,9 @@ | |||
| from lib.models.environment import Env | |||
|
|
|||
|
|
|||
| class Flight(BaseModel, frozen=True): | |||
| class Flight(BaseModel): | |||
There was a problem hiding this comment.
There are more arguments in the Flight class constructor, maybe in the future we could implement a few of them in here,
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Thanks for raising this!
I've included a few more that were easy and didn't break the binary generation here: 749a4ea
I think now only initial_solution is missing, I'll create a github issue to address it in the future
There was a problem hiding this comment.
@coderabbitai , can you please create the github issue to address the TODO: implementing initial_solution init parameter for the flight class ?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
@GabrielBarberini, the GitHub issue has been successfully created: #29.
Analysis chain
@GabrielBarberini, I've created the GitHub issue to address the TODO.
Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Create a GitHub issue to implement the 'initial_solution' init parameter for the 'Flight' class
gh issue create \
--title "Implement 'initial_solution' parameter in Flight class" \
--body $'We need to implement the `initial_solution` init parameter for the `Flight` class, as noted in the TODO comment in `lib/models/flight.py`.\n\nReference PR: https://github.com/RocketPy-Team/Infinity-API/pull/25\nReference comment: https://github.com/RocketPy-Team/Infinity-API/pull/25#discussion_r1753076737\n\nRequested by @GabrielBarberini.' \
--assignee GabrielBarberini
Length of output: 518
| from pydantic import BaseModel, PrivateAttr | ||
|
|
||
|
|
||
| class MotorKinds(str, Enum): | ||
| HYBRID: str = "HYBRID" | ||
| SOLID: str = "SOLID" | ||
| GENERIC: str = "GENERIC" |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
we also have the "EmptyMotor", which btw is a bit odd, but works sometimes,
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Thanks for raising awareness.
This one I prefer to address in the next version.
@coderabbitai can you please create a github issue for us?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
@GabrielBarberini, the GitHub issue has been created: #30.
Analysis chain
@GabrielBarberini, I've created a GitHub issue as requested.
Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Create a GitHub issue to address the 'EmptyMotor' in the next version
gh issue create \
--title "Address 'EmptyMotor' in next version" \
--body "As discussed in PR https://github.com/RocketPy-Team/Infinity-API/pull/25 and comment https://github.com/RocketPy-Team/Infinity-API/pull/25#discussion_r1753077078, we need to address the 'EmptyMotor' in the next version. Requested by @GabrielBarberini." \
--assignee "GabrielBarberini"
Length of output: 421
lib/models/rocket.py
Outdated
| cd_s: float = 10 | ||
| sampling_rate: int = 105 | ||
| lag: float = 1.5 | ||
| trigger: str = "lambda p, h, y: y[5] < 0 and h < 800" |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
I really prefer triggers as strings or number...
setting "apogee" would be really nice.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
patched in e323123
one can now insert:
- lambda expressions as strings matching arity, scope and syntax three verified under
check_parachute_trigger - ints or floats as strings (will get evaluated as int/floats, respectivelly)
- "apogee"
- floats
- ints
lib/views/motor.py
Outdated
| propellant_I_22: Optional[Any] | ||
| propellant_I_23: Optional[Any] | ||
| propellant_I_33: Optional[Any] | ||
| clip_thrust: Optional[Any] |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
This is a method
| clip_thrust: Optional[Any] |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
patched in 0f0cbd5
lib/views/flight.py
Outdated
| out_of_rail_time: Optional[float] | ||
| out_of_rail_time_index: Optional[int] | ||
| parachute_cd_s: Optional[float] | ||
| post_processed: Optional[bool] |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
This is legacy code
| post_processed: Optional[bool] |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
patched in 0f0cbd5
| rocket_radius=fins.radius, | ||
| airfoil=fins.airfoil, | ||
| ) | ||
| case _: |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
why have you repeated the code for trapezoidal? suggestion to simply remove the first match condition
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Good point. I prefer to keep the good matches explicit tho, will raise an ValueError in case of default.
Patched in eace9ee
lib/services/rocket.py
Outdated
| class InvalidParachuteTrigger(Exception): | ||
| pass |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Define this class out of this method, possibly in a different file.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
patched in e323123
| rocketpy_env = RocketPyEnvironment( | ||
| latitude=env.latitude, | ||
| longitude=env.longitude, | ||
| elevation=env.elevation, | ||
| date=env.date, | ||
| ) | ||
| rocketpy_env.set_atmospheric_model( | ||
| type=env.atmospheric_model_type, file=env.atmospheric_model_file | ||
| ) | ||
| return cls(environment=rocketpy_env) |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Just take in mind that the set_atmospheric_model may not work if you use Forecast models for dates in the past.
In other words, the same code may generate different results depending on the time you execute it, this is due to the env.date attribute.
For example, you can only use Forecast/GFS model for dates in the future.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Noted!
I think this sums up to a large list of scenarios where simulation would fail due to invalid input, even if in this particular case the input was valid at some point in time.
Although I don't see env.date joining the list so soon, I've discussed with @phmbressan around such issues and we agreed that it would be great to safe-guard some of the inputs to reduce errors like that. There is a github issue to handle that in the future #26
GabrielBarberini
force-pushed
the
refactor
branch
from
771c400
to
749a4ea
Compare
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 1
Outside diff range and nitpick comments (1)
Makefile (1)
6-7: LGTM!The
flake8target correctly runs the Flake8 linter on the code in the./libdirectory while ignoring specific error codes.Consider adding a comment to document the ignored error codes and the rationale behind ignoring them. This will help maintain consistency and make it easier for other developers to understand the linting configuration.
Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
Files selected for processing (3)
- Makefile (1 hunks)
- lib/models/flight.py (1 hunks)
- lib/services/flight.py (1 hunks)
Files skipped from review as they are similar to previous changes (1)
- lib/services/flight.py
Additional comments not posted (10)
Makefile (6)
1-2: LGTM!The
blacktarget correctly uses the Black code formatter to format the code in the./libdirectory.
4-4: LGTM!The
linttarget is a good practice to ensure comprehensive linting by running bothflake8andpylinttargets.
9-10: LGTM!The
pylinttarget correctly runs the Pylint linter on all Python files in the./libdirectory while including thepydanticpackage in its checks.
12-13: LGTM!The
devtarget correctly starts a development server using Uvicorn on port 3000 with live reload enabled.
15-18: LGTM!The
cleantarget correctly stops and removes theinfinity-apiDocker container and prunes unused Docker objects.
20-21: LGTM!The
buildtarget correctly builds a Docker image namedinfinity-apiwithout using the cache.lib/models/flight.py (4)
1-2: LGTM!The new imports for
EnumandOptionalare valid and follow the correct syntax. They align with the changes introduced in the file.
8-10: LGTM!The new
EquationsOfMotionenum is correctly defined and follows the best practices. The choice of string values for the enum is valid and appropriate.
13-31: Great work on enhancing theFlightclass!The removal of
frozen=Trueand the addition of new optional attributes align with the goal of making theFlightclass more configurable and flexible. The default values for the new attributes seem reasonable.The changes also address the past review comments by adding more constructor arguments, as discussed.
18-19: LGTM!The modifications to
inclinationandheadingattributes, making them optional floats with default values, provide more flexibility and align with the overall enhancements to theFlightclass. The chosen default values seem reasonable.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 1
Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
Files selected for processing (2)
- lib/views/flight.py (2 hunks)
- lib/views/motor.py (2 hunks)
Additional comments not posted (9)
lib/views/motor.py (4)
8-68: LGTM! The addition of optional attributes enhances the motor data model.The expanded set of optional attributes in the
MotorSummaryclass provides a more comprehensive and flexible representation of motor data. The use ofOptionalaligns with best practices for handling potentially missing data.
77-77: LGTM! The attribute renaming aligns the naming convention.The renaming of
new_motor_idtomotor_idin theMotorUpdatedclass aligns the naming convention with other classes likeMotorDeleted. This improves consistency and readability without introducing any functional changes.
82-82: LGTM! The attribute renaming aligns the naming convention.The renaming of
deleted_motor_idtomotor_idin theMotorDeletedclass aligns the naming convention with other classes likeMotorUpdated. This improves consistency and readability without introducing any functional changes.
86-87: LGTM! The newMotorViewclass enhances motor-related functionality.The addition of the
MotorViewclass, which extends theMotorclass, provides a specialized view for motors. Theselected_motor_kindattribute allows for tracking or displaying the currently selected motor type, potentially enabling more specific interactions with different motor kinds. This enhancement aligns with the overall motor-related functionality in the codebase.lib/views/flight.py (5)
8-155: TheFlightSummaryclass looks good with its modular design and flexible attributes.The class inherits from
RocketSummaryandEnvSummary, which promotes code reuse and modularity. The numerous optional attributes provide flexibility in representing flight data, allowing for handling incomplete or partial data.Please consider addressing the TODO comments in future iterations to further enhance the functionality and usability of the class.
Line range hint
158-160:
163-166: LGTM!The attribute renaming from
new_flight_idtoflight_idimproves consistency with other classes.
168-171: Looks good!Renaming the attribute from
deleted_flight_idtoflight_idenhances consistency across the codebase.
173-174: The newFlightViewclass looks good!Extending the
Flightclass and incorporating therocketattribute of typeRocketViewprovides a useful abstraction layer to encapsulate rocket-specific details within the flight context. This enhances the modularity and organization of the codebase.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 0
Outside diff range and nitpick comments (1)
lib/models/rocket.py (1)
19-26: Approve theParachuteclass with a suggestion for thetriggerattribute.The new
Parachuteclass effectively encapsulates the properties of a parachute. The attributes are appropriately typed and have default values, enhancing the usability of the class.However, consider defining the
triggercondition as a separate function instead of using a string representation of a lambda function. This can improve code readability and maintainability.def default_parachute_trigger(p, h, y): return y[5] < 0 and h < 800 class Parachute(BaseModel): ... trigger: Union[str, float] = default_parachute_trigger ...
Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
Files selected for processing (2)
- lib/models/rocket.py (1 hunks)
- lib/services/rocket.py (1 hunks)
Files skipped from review as they are similar to previous changes (1)
- lib/services/rocket.py
Additional comments not posted (3)
lib/models/rocket.py (3)
14-16: LGTM!The new
CoordinateSystemOrientationenum provides a clear and structured way to define the orientation of the rocket's coordinate system. The enum values are self-explanatory and improve code readability.
28-85: Approve theRocketclass restructuring with a request for verification.The restructuring of the
Rocketclass enhances its flexibility and usability by allowing for multiple parachutes and detailed configurations for each component. The initialization logic has been simplified, and thecoordinate_system_orientationattribute now uses the newCoordinateSystemOrientationenum, improving code clarity and structure.However, please verify the impact of the changes made to the default values of
power_off_dragandpower_on_dragon the drag calculation logic and ensure that the modifications align with the intended behavior.
19-26: Duplicate comment: Prefer strings or numbers for thetriggerattribute.The existing comment by Gui-FernandesBR is still valid and applicable to the current code changes. The suggestion to use strings or numbers for the
triggerattribute aligns with the current implementation.Additionally, the comment about setting "apogee" as a nice option is a valid suggestion for enhancing the usability of the
Parachuteclass. Consider adding "apogee" as a predefined trigger option to simplify the configuration of parachute deployment.
|
@coderabbitai, can you please also make sure to bind this PR with #21 as well? The refactoring here also solves the issue brought by @Gui-FernandesBR on it. |
|
Tip For best results, initiate chat on the files or code changes. @GabrielBarberini, certainly! To bind this PR with issue #21, you can add "Closes #21" to the PR description. This will automatically close the issue when the PR is merged. Let me know if you need any assistance with this! |
Summary by CodeRabbit
Summary by CodeRabbit
New Features
Makefilefor streamlined code formatting, linting, and Docker management.AirBrakesandFinsKinds.RocketServiceandFlightServiceclasses for enhanced management of rocket and flight data within the simulation framework.FlightSummaryandMotorSummaryclasses with additional attributes for detailed data representation.Bug Fixes
Documentation
Refactor