Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

PP constraint #1240

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Jul 22, 2014
Merged

PP constraint #1240

merged 1 commit into from
Jul 22, 2014

Conversation

marqh
Copy link
Member

@marqh marqh commented Jul 18, 2014

additional to #1237, targeted at 1.7.x

@marqh marqh mentioned this pull request Jul 18, 2014
@davidSextonWork
Copy link

👍 from me too! Tests show reading in a pp field from a list of files which contain several fields is sped up by a factor of 12. This is the sort of a gain in performance that would really encourage users to take up Iris.

@pp-mo pp-mo self-assigned this Jul 21, 2014
@rhattersley rhattersley changed the title Pp constraint PP constraint Jul 21, 2014
@@ -1677,8 +1677,35 @@ def reset_save_rules():

_save_rules = None

def _convert_constraints(constraints):
Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

PEP8 wants an extra blank line here

@pp-mo
Copy link
Member

pp-mo commented Jul 21, 2014

Nice work, it all fits in a lot more neatly than I'd have expected.
Done picking-- back to you @marqh !

#
# You should have received a copy of the GNU Lesser General Public License
# along with Iris. If not, see <http://www.gnu.org/licenses/>.
"""Unit tests for :func:`iris.fileformats.rules.load_cubes`."""
Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Since it moved, this isn't quite right any more -- also the filename (or path?) now needs to give it a bit more context.

@pp-mo
Copy link
Member

pp-mo commented Jul 22, 2014

other than #1240 (comment) , all ok now I think.
Thanks @marqh

@rhattersley
Copy link
Member

Thanks @marqh and @pp-mo for progressing quickly. It's soooo close now! ... 😁

pp-mo added a commit that referenced this pull request Jul 22, 2014
@pp-mo pp-mo merged commit c948297 into SciTools:v1.7.x Jul 22, 2014
@pp-mo
Copy link
Member

pp-mo commented Jul 22, 2014

Great stuff !
Thanks @marqh

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants