-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 286
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
setup.py for pypi #2585
setup.py for pypi #2585
Conversation
setup.py
Outdated
author='Iris, SciTools, UK Met Office', | ||
maintainer='Iris, SciTools', | ||
license='LGPLv3', | ||
platforms='any', |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
@marqh platforms='any'
... really? Commodore64, please!
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Is this even used any more? I though it was more in classifiers.
@bjlittle any further requests for change on this? |
I left a review comment at #2544 (comment). Essentially, given http://legacy.python.org/dev/peps/pep-0423/#top-level-namespace-relates-to-code-ownership, I'd favour naming it scitools-iris. |
0423 seems to be related to namespace in code. there is no implication here on namespace in code, the namespace for iris is this name only affects pypi naming and
seems more intuitive to me than
and i would prefer
how do objectors address the comment from @lbdreyer:
if I were to flipflop, would this just get merged, or would it fire off further "i'd prefer it the other way" comments? |
Closed by #2890. |
proposed replacement for #2544