Skip to content

Chore: new ff release#212

Merged
EnzalRad merged 1 commit intomainfrom
chore/new_ff_version
Dec 10, 2025
Merged

Chore: new ff release#212
EnzalRad merged 1 commit intomainfrom
chore/new_ff_version

Conversation

@EnzalRad
Copy link
Contributor

@EnzalRad EnzalRad commented Dec 10, 2025

Summary by CodeRabbit

  • New Features

    • Added infrastructure provider to runner context.
  • Documentation

    • Updated changelog for version 0.4.0.
  • Chores

    • Bumped package version to 0.4.0.

✏️ Tip: You can customize this high-level summary in your review settings.

@vercel
Copy link

vercel bot commented Dec 10, 2025

The latest updates on your projects. Learn more about Vercel for GitHub.

Project Deployment Preview Comments Updated (UTC)
react-ui Ready Ready Preview Comment Dec 10, 2025 9:48am

@coderabbitai
Copy link

coderabbitai bot commented Dec 10, 2025

Important

Review skipped

Auto incremental reviews are disabled on this repository.

Please check the settings in the CodeRabbit UI or the .coderabbit.yaml file in this repository. To trigger a single review, invoke the @coderabbitai review command.

You can disable this status message by setting the reviews.review_status to false in the CodeRabbit configuration file.

Walkthrough

This pull request bumps the version of the feature-flag package from 0.3.0 to 0.4.0 and updates the changelog with a new minor release section documenting the addition of an Infrastructure provider to the runner context.

Changes

Cohort / File(s) Summary
Feature-flag package release
libs/node/feature-flag/CHANGELOG.md, libs/node/feature-flag/package.json
Version bumped to 0.4.0 with changelog entry documenting the addition of Infrastructure provider to runner context

Estimated code review effort

🎯 2 (Simple) | ⏱️ ~5 minutes

  • Version bump is straightforward and confined to package metadata
  • Changelog entry is a single line referencing a feature added elsewhere
  • No logic, dependencies, or structural changes to review

Possibly related PRs

  • New version release #138: Modifies the same feature-flag package with related runner-context changelog entries and version management

Suggested reviewers

  • noe-charmet
  • dvxam

Poem

🐰 A version hops up, from three to four,
Infrastructure in the runner's core,
With context fresh and providers new,
The feature-flag does what it's meant to do! 🚀

Pre-merge checks and finishing touches

❌ Failed checks (1 inconclusive)
Check name Status Explanation Resolution
Title check ❓ Inconclusive The title 'Chore: new ff release' is vague and does not clearly specify what changed. It uses generic phrasing ('new ff release') without indicating the specific component or version bump details. Consider using a more descriptive title such as 'Chore: bump feature-flag package to 0.4.0' or 'Chore: release feature-flag v0.4.0 with infrastructure provider context' to clarify the specific changes.
✅ Passed checks (2 passed)
Check name Status Explanation
Description Check ✅ Passed Check skipped - CodeRabbit’s high-level summary is enabled.
Docstring Coverage ✅ Passed No functions found in the changed files to evaluate docstring coverage. Skipping docstring coverage check.

Thanks for using CodeRabbit! It's free for OSS, and your support helps us grow. If you like it, consider giving us a shout-out.

❤️ Share

Comment @coderabbitai help to get the list of available commands and usage tips.

Copy link

@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Actionable comments posted: 1

📜 Review details

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI

Review profile: CHILL

Plan: Pro

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between 01ab726 and 64e7808.

📒 Files selected for processing (2)
  • libs/node/feature-flag/CHANGELOG.md (1 hunks)
  • libs/node/feature-flag/package.json (1 hunks)
🧰 Additional context used
📓 Path-based instructions (1)
**/*

⚙️ CodeRabbit configuration file

We handle errors at the edge of our applications in most cases. Do not recommend to add error handling around every single function. We prefer them to bubble up and be handled at upper layers.

Files:

  • libs/node/feature-flag/CHANGELOG.md
  • libs/node/feature-flag/package.json
🔇 Additional comments (1)
libs/node/feature-flag/package.json (1)

5-5: Version bump is correct.

The version field is properly updated to 0.4.0, consistent with the minor feature addition documented in the changelog.

Comment on lines 3 to 7
## 0..0

### Minor Changes

- a0bf18a: Add Infrastructure provider to runner context
Copy link

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

⚠️ Potential issue | 🔴 Critical

Fix malformed version number in changelog.

The version header is written as "0..0" (double dot), which is invalid semantic versioning. It should match the version in package.json (0.4.0).

-## 0..0
+## 0.4.0
📝 Committable suggestion

‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.

Suggested change
## 0..0
### Minor Changes
- a0bf18a: Add Infrastructure provider to runner context
## 0.4.0
### Minor Changes
- a0bf18a: Add Infrastructure provider to runner context
🤖 Prompt for AI Agents
In libs/node/feature-flag/CHANGELOG.md around lines 3 to 7 the release header is
written as "## 0..0" which is malformed; update that header to the correct
semantic version "## 0.4.0" (matching package.json) and ensure any other
changelog references to the version are consistent with package.json.

@EnzalRad EnzalRad enabled auto-merge (squash) December 10, 2025 09:48
@EnzalRad EnzalRad merged commit 07a65b3 into main Dec 10, 2025
4 checks passed
@EnzalRad EnzalRad deleted the chore/new_ff_version branch December 10, 2025 09:49
This was referenced Dec 10, 2025
EnzalRad added a commit that referenced this pull request Dec 10, 2025
EnzalRad added a commit that referenced this pull request Dec 10, 2025
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants