-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 365
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Add SQALE model definitions for the built-in checks #199
Comments
I think as of sonar 4.3 it should be possible to define remediation costs Regarding the model, might be a good idea just to keep the cxx-model.XML On May 4, 2014 12:54 PM, "Bert" notifications@github.com wrote:
|
Defining techn. debt using annotations will of course solves this issue for the future. |
is it ok for you if i write a simple application that takes uses only the On Sun, May 4, 2014 at 2:19 PM, Bert notifications@github.com wrote:
|
That is OK for me. So I do not need to create a XSL template to sort cxx-model.xml. |
Hi guys! is anyone interested in making a pull request for this? The annotations Jorge spoke about seem to be still not in use, so this would involve editing cxx-model.xml |
The best for now is to add those characteristics directly I to model I can On Thu, Dec 18, 2014, 12:37 Waleri Enns notifications@github.com wrote:
|
Closed by merging #330 |
The current definition for Sqale model does not specify remediation costs for cxx-checks like FunctionCyclomaticComplexity, FileCyclomaticComplexity, ... and manual updates of cxx-model.xml is a major effort.
Therefore all available cxx-checks shall be added to the Sqale model and also the cxx-model.xml file shall be formatted in a structured way to allow authoring and merging of customized settings.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: