Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

added stack_using_two_queues.py #10080

Closed
wants to merge 12 commits into from
Closed

Conversation

Samar-28
Copy link

@Samar-28 Samar-28 commented Oct 8, 2023

Describe your change:

"Fixes #9987".

  • Add an algorithm?
  • Fix a bug or typo in an existing algorithm?
  • Documentation change?

Checklist:

  • I have read CONTRIBUTING.md.
  • This pull request is all my own work -- I have not plagiarized.
  • I know that pull requests will not be merged if they fail the automated tests.
  • This PR only changes one algorithm file. To ease review, please open separate PRs for separate algorithms.
  • All new Python files are placed inside an existing directory.
  • All filenames are in all lowercase characters with no spaces or dashes.
  • All functions and variable names follow Python naming conventions.
  • All function parameters and return values are annotated with Python type hints.
  • All functions have doctests that pass the automated testing.
  • All new algorithms include at least one URL that points to Wikipedia or another similar explanation.
  • If this pull request resolves one or more open issues then the description above includes the issue number(s) with a closing keyword: "Fixes #ISSUE-NUMBER".

@algorithms-keeper algorithms-keeper bot added require tests Tests [doctest/unittest/pytest] are required require type hints https://docs.python.org/3/library/typing.html labels Oct 8, 2023
Copy link

@algorithms-keeper algorithms-keeper bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Click here to look at the relevant links ⬇️

🔗 Relevant Links

Repository:

Python:

Automated review generated by algorithms-keeper. If there's any problem regarding this review, please open an issue about it.

algorithms-keeper commands and options

algorithms-keeper actions can be triggered by commenting on this PR:

  • @algorithms-keeper review to trigger the checks for only added pull request files
  • @algorithms-keeper review-all to trigger the checks for all the pull request files, including the modified files. As we cannot post review comments on lines not part of the diff, this command will post all the messages in one comment.

NOTE: Commands are in beta and so this feature is restricted only to a member or owner of the organization.

@@ -0,0 +1,50 @@
class Stack:
def __init__(self):

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Please provide return type hint for the function: __init__. If the function does not return a value, please provide the type hint as: def function() -> None:

def __init__(self):
self.items = []

def push(self, item):

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

As there is no test file in this pull request nor any test function or class in the file data_structures/stacks/stack_using_two_queues.py, please provide doctest for the function push

Please provide return type hint for the function: push. If the function does not return a value, please provide the type hint as: def function() -> None:

Please provide type hint for the parameter: item

def push(self, item):
self.items.append(item)

def pop(self):

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

As there is no test file in this pull request nor any test function or class in the file data_structures/stacks/stack_using_two_queues.py, please provide doctest for the function pop

Please provide return type hint for the function: pop. If the function does not return a value, please provide the type hint as: def function() -> None:

else:
return "Stack is empty"

def peek(self):

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

As there is no test file in this pull request nor any test function or class in the file data_structures/stacks/stack_using_two_queues.py, please provide doctest for the function peek

Please provide return type hint for the function: peek. If the function does not return a value, please provide the type hint as: def function() -> None:

else:
return "Stack is empty"

def is_empty(self):

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

As there is no test file in this pull request nor any test function or class in the file data_structures/stacks/stack_using_two_queues.py, please provide doctest for the function is_empty

Please provide return type hint for the function: is_empty. If the function does not return a value, please provide the type hint as: def function() -> None:

def is_empty(self):
return len(self.items) == 0

def size(self):

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

As there is no test file in this pull request nor any test function or class in the file data_structures/stacks/stack_using_two_queues.py, please provide doctest for the function size

Please provide return type hint for the function: size. If the function does not return a value, please provide the type hint as: def function() -> None:

@algorithms-keeper algorithms-keeper bot added the awaiting reviews This PR is ready to be reviewed label Oct 8, 2023
@algorithms-keeper algorithms-keeper bot added tests are failing Do not merge until tests pass and removed tests are failing Do not merge until tests pass labels Oct 8, 2023
@algorithms-keeper algorithms-keeper bot removed the require tests Tests [doctest/unittest/pytest] are required label Oct 8, 2023
Copy link

@algorithms-keeper algorithms-keeper bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Click here to look at the relevant links ⬇️

🔗 Relevant Links

Repository:

Python:

Automated review generated by algorithms-keeper. If there's any problem regarding this review, please open an issue about it.

algorithms-keeper commands and options

algorithms-keeper actions can be triggered by commenting on this PR:

  • @algorithms-keeper review to trigger the checks for only added pull request files
  • @algorithms-keeper review-all to trigger the checks for all the pull request files, including the modified files. As we cannot post review comments on lines not part of the diff, this command will post all the messages in one comment.

NOTE: Commands are in beta and so this feature is restricted only to a member or owner of the organization.


class StackUsingQueues:

def __init__(self):

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Please provide return type hint for the function: __init__. If the function does not return a value, please provide the type hint as: def function() -> None:

@algorithms-keeper algorithms-keeper bot added the tests are failing Do not merge until tests pass label Oct 8, 2023
@algorithms-keeper algorithms-keeper bot removed require type hints https://docs.python.org/3/library/typing.html tests are failing Do not merge until tests pass labels Oct 8, 2023
@algorithms-keeper algorithms-keeper bot added the tests are failing Do not merge until tests pass label Oct 8, 2023
Copy link
Member

@cclauss cclauss left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

We already have #10002 open.

@cclauss cclauss self-assigned this Oct 8, 2023
@cclauss
Copy link
Member

cclauss commented Oct 15, 2023

Fixed in data_structures/stacks/stack_using_two_queues.py

@cclauss cclauss closed this Oct 15, 2023
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
awaiting reviews This PR is ready to be reviewed tests are failing Do not merge until tests pass
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

[ADD]:Stack using two Queues
2 participants