Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

stack_using_two_queues #10002

Conversation

IndranjanaChatterjee
Copy link

Describe your change:

Added the code for the implementation of stack using two queues

Fixes:#9987

  • Add an algorithm?

Checklist:

  • I have read CONTRIBUTING.md.
  • This pull request is all my own work -- I have not plagiarized.
  • I know that pull requests will not be merged if they fail the automated tests.
  • This PR only changes one algorithm file. To ease review, please open separate PRs for separate algorithms.
  • All new Python files are placed inside an existing directory.
  • All filenames are in all lowercase characters with no spaces or dashes.
  • All functions and variable names follow Python naming conventions.
  • All function parameters and return values are annotated with Python type hints.
  • All functions have doctests that pass the automated testing.
  • All new algorithms include at least one URL that points to Wikipedia or another similar explanation.
  • If this pull request resolves one or more open issues then the description above includes the issue number(s) with a closing keyword: "Fixes #ISSUE-NUMBER".

@algorithms-keeper algorithms-keeper bot added the awaiting reviews This PR is ready to be reviewed label Oct 7, 2023
@algorithms-keeper algorithms-keeper bot added tests are failing Do not merge until tests pass and removed tests are failing Do not merge until tests pass labels Oct 7, 2023
Copy link
Member

@cclauss cclauss left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Looks cool...

Comment on lines +5 to +8
""" Implementing stack using two arrays"""


class Stack(Generic[T]): # Stack class to implement stack operations
Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Suggested change
""" Implementing stack using two arrays"""
class Stack(Generic[T]): # Stack class to implement stack operations
class Stack(Generic[T]):
""" Implement a stack using two queues"""

class Stack(Generic[T]): # Stack class to implement stack operations
def __init__(self) -> None:
self.insert_queue = deque() # First Queue to be used for inserting
self.suffle_queue = deque() # Second Queue to be used for suffling
Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

suffling is not a word.

Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

OPTIONAL: Should Stack be a dataclass?

self.suffle_queue = deque() # Second Queue to be used for suffling

def push(self, item: int) -> None:
self.insert_queue.append(item) # Add items into the Queue
Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

The code already says what the comment repeats.

Suggested change
self.insert_queue.append(item) # Add items into the Queue
self.insert_queue.append(item)

Comment on lines +16 to +18
self.insert_queue.append(
self.suffle_queue.popleft()
) # Popping the elements
Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Let's not wrap lines just to make room for a comment.

Suggested change
self.insert_queue.append(
self.suffle_queue.popleft()
) # Popping the elements
# Popping the elements
self.insert_queue.append(self.suffle_queue.popleft())

self.insert_queue, self.suffle_queue = self.suffle_queue, self.insert_queue

def pop(self) -> int:
if not (self.suffle_queue): # if the stack is empty
Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Suggested change
if not (self.suffle_queue): # if the stack is empty
if not self.suffle_queue: # if the stack is empty

Comment on lines +32 to +36
def printing(self) -> None:
print(self.suffle_queue)

def size(self) -> int:
return len(self.suffle_queue)
Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

These magic methods will allow us to just print(stack) and len(stack).

Suggested change
def printing(self) -> None:
print(self.suffle_queue)
def size(self) -> int:
return len(self.suffle_queue)
def __str__(self) -> str:
return tuple(self.suffle_queue)
def __len__(self) -> int:
return len(self.suffle_queue)



def test_stack() -> None:
s = Stack() # Creating a stack in S
Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Single-letter variable names makes code look like it was written in the 1970's.

Suggested change
s = Stack() # Creating a stack in S
stack = Stack() # Create a empty stack

@algorithms-keeper algorithms-keeper bot added awaiting changes A maintainer has requested changes to this PR and removed awaiting reviews This PR is ready to be reviewed labels Oct 8, 2023
@OneSouhardyo OneSouhardyo mentioned this pull request Oct 8, 2023
14 tasks
@IndranjanaChatterjee IndranjanaChatterjee mentioned this pull request Oct 8, 2023
12 tasks
@IndranjanaChatterjee
Copy link
Author

@cclauss I have tried to make the required changes in the PR #10109 . Please review. Apologies for the inconveniences caused.

@cclauss
Copy link
Member

cclauss commented Oct 15, 2023

Fixed in data_structures/stacks/stack_using_two_queues.py

@cclauss cclauss closed this Oct 15, 2023
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
awaiting changes A maintainer has requested changes to this PR
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants