-
-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 5
Runtime async #62
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Draft
TheAngryByrd
wants to merge
13
commits into
master
Choose a base branch
from
runtime-async
base: master
Could not load branches
Branch not found: {{ refName }}
Loading
Could not load tags
Nothing to show
Loading
Are you sure you want to change the base?
Some commits from the old base branch may be removed from the timeline,
and old review comments may become outdated.
Draft
Runtime async #62
+2,086
−286
Conversation
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
…CancellablePoolingValueTask for .NET 6.0 or greater
…e tests for consistency
…s for improved performance
e9fa6d2 to
5d0f53e
Compare
- Updated benchmark results for SyncCompletionBenchmarks with new timestamps and .NET SDK version. - Introduced TaskBuilderRuntime in Consts.fs for categorization. - Added benchmarks for ManyWriteFile using TaskBuilderRuntime in FileWritingBenchmarks.fs. - Implemented synchronous completion benchmarks for TaskBuilderRuntime in SynchonousCompletionBenchmark.fs. - Updated project file to target .NET 10.0 only.
…groundTaskBuilderRuntime for background execution support
Owner
Author
|
Noticed some strange behavior with It should not be this fast. Made me discover we're probably blocked by dotnet/fsharp#19056 Converting to draft until then |
…prove For loop implementation
…tFrameworks and cleaning up unnecessary properties
…st global.json SDK version
…stack trace checks
…e target frameworks - Updated `FileWritingBenchmarks.fs` to raise a NotSupportedException for .NET versions below 10.0. - Modified `SynchonousCompletionBenchmark.fs` to include conditional compilation for .NET 10.0 or greater, raising exceptions for unsupported versions. - Adjusted `benchmarks.fsproj` to target multiple frameworks: net10.0, net9.0, and net8.0.
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Proposed Changes
Describe the big picture of your changes here to communicate to the maintainers why we should accept this pull request. If it fixes a bug or resolves a feature request, be sure to link to that issue.
Implements Runtime-Async features
Types of changes
What types of changes does your code introduce to IcedTasks?
Put an
xin the boxes that applyChecklist
Put an
xin the boxes that apply. You can also fill these out after creating the PR. If you're unsure about any of them, don't hesitate to ask. We're here to help! This is simply a reminder of what we are going to look for before merging your code.Further comments
If this is a relatively large or complex change, kick off the discussion by explaining why you chose the solution you did and what alternatives you considered, etc...