Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

[Fix] nginx 용량 수정 #99

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Jun 13, 2024
Merged

[Fix] nginx 용량 수정 #99

Changes from all commits
Commits
Show all changes
1 commit
Select commit
File filter

Filter by extension

Filter by extension
Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
7 changes: 7 additions & 0 deletions ebextensions/01_nginx.config
View file
Open in desktop
Original file line number Diff line number Diff line change
@@ -0,0 +1,7 @@
files:
"/etc/nginx/conf.d/proxy.conf":
mode: "000644"
owner: "root"
group: "root"
content: |
client_max_body_size 100M;
Copy link

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

This code patch seems to be a YAML snippet intended for configuration management tools like Ansible or Puppet. Here's a brief review based on the provided information:

  1. Bug risk:

    • No obvious bugs in this snippet. It looks correct for its intended purpose.

  2. Improvement suggestions:

    • Consider adding a newline at the end of the content block to adhere to conventions and for readability.
    • Ensure that the file path "/etc/nginx/conf.d/proxy.conf" is accurate and matches your system's configuration.

  3. Potential enhancements:

    • Parameterize values like file paths, permissions, and content to make the script more reusable and versatile.
    • Error handling can be added to manage scenarios where the file cannot be created/modified successfully.
    • Check if the configuration change requires an Nginx restart/reload to take effect and handle this if necessary.

Remember that this review is based solely on the provided snippet, and additional context or code would be required for a more comprehensive assessment.

Loading