Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

RSS Summary #2332

Closed
kumarharsh opened this issue Mar 4, 2014 · 6 comments
Closed

RSS Summary #2332

kumarharsh opened this issue Mar 4, 2014 · 6 comments

Comments

@kumarharsh
Copy link

Normally, RSS feeds give you a summary, and when you follow the link, you get to read the whole blog post.
It seems like Ghost does not offer a way to specify a "summary" block in the post, and thus the whole post is downloaded, which is unnecessary and eats up bandwidth.

Is there a way to specify a summary for Ghost posts?

@halfdan
Copy link
Contributor

halfdan commented Mar 4, 2014

Hi @kumarharsh, this is a question most suited for our forums. To answer your question: There is currently no way of doing that, but it will be possible once apps are available (most likely in Ghost 0.5).

On a personal note: I don't like blogs that do this as it forces me to visit their website. I usually unsubscribe from feeds that don't give me the full content.

@ErisDS
Copy link
Member

ErisDS commented Mar 4, 2014

Not sure what you're basing your 'normally' on, but I echo @halfdan on this.

It's something to talk about in #2263, but I don't think we are doing it wrong.

@ErisDS ErisDS closed this as completed Mar 4, 2014
@kumarharsh
Copy link
Author

@ErisDS I am basing my normally on the fact that for all the feeds I encountered till now.

@halfdan I'm more ambivalent on the issue of blog posts not supplying a summary. Of course, you shouldn't be dictating how people serve their content. As for the unsubscribing, I'd do the same if it was link-bait or upworthy kind of summaries, but sometimes it really is required. A good usecase would be saving up on internet bandwidth in the not-so-connected parts of the world
Would you throw out a book which had a summary on it's back cover?

@javorszky
Copy link
Contributor

It is a talk for #2263 or apps. On a new note, according to this: http://www.rssboard.org/rss-specification#hrelementsOfLtitemgt, the only content field of an item is description. As soon as apps land, I would expect people to build one that allows you to filter that. We're collecting use cases for app ideas here: https://github.com/TryGhost/Ghost/wiki/App-Ideas, and the ability to filter rss feeds is already one of them.

@halfdan
Copy link
Contributor

halfdan commented Mar 5, 2014

@kumarharsh Personal experience is very subjective - https://yourlogicalfallacyis.com/anecdotal. As for bandwidth, when a user has to visit a website to view the actual content rather than seeing it embedded in the RSS feed he'd waste a lot more bandwidth.

As @javorszky already said, this is something for which you'll be able to build an app for. While I agree that description is misleading if you provide the full content it's also worth noting that the Atom format comes with both summary and content (http://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc4287#section-4.1.3) for feeds. (On a comparison between the two see: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/RSS#RSS_Compared_to_Atom).

@kumarharsh
Copy link
Author

@halfdan yes, I agree with your last point. Anyways, you're the guys building Ghost, so you'd have more knowledge in this regard. I'll probably have to implement a plugin or something for the blog.

On a lighter note: https://yourlogicalfallacyis.com/the-fallacy-fallacy

tigefa4u pushed a commit to tigefa4u/Ghost that referenced this issue Aug 3, 2022
refs TryGhost/Product#1302

* Tweaked the getIcon() function to better support the new event data variable for cancelled
* Added back in info for events across all activity lists

Co-authored-by: James Morris <moreofmorris@users.noreply.github.com>
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

4 participants