Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I've double-checked that the props passed here are the ones expected as from the older approach in https://github.com/WordPress/gutenberg/blob/trunk/packages/react-native-editor/src/index.js#L57-L66 👍
I was wondering if we should remove the
native.render
action or keep it if it's needed in the future, what do you think? I'm fine with keeping it by the way.There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Thanks for checking it 🙇 ! I saw that we only use the
capabilities
prop when registering the Jetpack blocks, which is already being passed.There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Good question. AFAIK it's not being used anywhere, so I understand we could remove it. If we need it in the future we can always revert it back.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Sounds good to me! Are we planning to do that in a follow-up PR? This PR is ready for my approval so let me know!
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Ah, sorry. I'm planning to apply the suggestion in this PR. In fact, I noticed that I missed adding a unit test for the new hook. I'll let you know when I pushed the changes, thanks!
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Cool! I'll keep an eye out for those, thanks!
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
@geriux I've applied you suggestion 2edd4a8.
I also updated the unit tests in 7fb8ba6. It took way longer than I expected because the test logic required some tricky changes to check the call orders. Let me know if you have any concerns/questions regarding that, thanks 🙇 !
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Thanks! I'll check it out