-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 84
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
from_xrpl
should not accept snake_case dict keys
#694
Merged
Merged
Changes from 13 commits
Commits
Show all changes
18 commits
Select commit
Hold shift + click to select a range
2271cc2
BaseModel.from_xrpl method should not accept snake_case keys in dicti…
ckeshava b08db2f
Update xrpl/models/base_model.py
ckeshava 76d85bc
address PR comments
ckeshava 7b38ffa
Merge branch 'noCamelCase' of https://github.com/XRPLF/xrpl-py into n…
ckeshava 7cedb8c
update CHANGELOG
ckeshava 0644ad2
remove a ipynb file, not relevant to the xrpl-py project
ckeshava 69dbdb1
addres PR comments
ckeshava 7405ba3
rectify the errors in comments
ckeshava 06ba260
Update CHANGELOG.md
ckeshava f63d8c5
address PR comments
ckeshava 244369c
Merge branch 'noCamelCase' of https://github.com/XRPLF/xrpl-py into n…
ckeshava 605202d
Merge branch 'main' into noCamelCase
ckeshava 154aa8e
Merge branch 'main' into noCamelCase
ckeshava 58ff257
split unit tests into two -- Request and Transaction model validation
ckeshava 626e504
Merge branch 'noCamelCase' of https://github.com/XRPLF/xrpl-py into n…
ckeshava d30fe18
Merge branch 'main' into noCamelCase
ckeshava c897e47
Merge branch 'main' into noCamelCase
ckeshava d1ee2c0
Fix integration test: Update regex to accomodate Amount2 AMM field
ckeshava File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
There are no files selected for viewing
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Oops, something went wrong.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
What's the difference between this test case and
tx_snake_case_keys
? Just want to make sure I'm following what's going on here :)There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Hello, both the tests dis-allow
snake_case
keys inRequest
andTransaction
models, respectively. I used different inputs for two different modelsThere was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Could you split it into 2 tests (2 functions)?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
fixed in 58ff257