Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Common - Add FUNC(doArtilleryFire) #9260

Draft
wants to merge 56 commits into
base: master
Choose a base branch
from

Conversation

LinkIsGrim
Copy link
Contributor

@LinkIsGrim LinkIsGrim commented Jul 13, 2023

When merged this pull request will:

  • Title. Public wrapper for engine doArtilleryFire. Handles CSW magazines, reloading, and barrage sizes larger than the magazine.

Loop comes from here.

Relevant files are FUNC(doArtilleryFire) and FUNC(handleDoArtilleryFire).

Requires #9234 (and ideally #9238).

IMPORTANT

  • If the contribution affects the documentation, please include your changes in this pull request so the documentation will appear on the website.
  • Development Guidelines are read, understood and applied.
  • Title of this PR uses our standard template Component - Add|Fix|Improve|Change|Make|Remove {changes}.

@LinkIsGrim LinkIsGrim added the kind/feature Release Notes: **ADDED:** label Jul 14, 2023
@PabstMirror
Copy link
Contributor

function looks good, but I don't think it belongs in artillerytables, probably just csw?

@LinkIsGrim
Copy link
Contributor Author

If not Artillery Tables then I'd move this to Common. Maybe just move the CSW handling to a separate function in CSW and keep this in Artillery Tables?

@LinkIsGrim LinkIsGrim changed the title Artillery Tables - Add FUNC(doArtilleryFire) Common - Add FUNC(doArtilleryFire) Jul 16, 2023
@LinkIsGrim LinkIsGrim marked this pull request as draft September 9, 2023 06:31
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
kind/feature Release Notes: **ADDED:**
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants