Adjust client GET read benchmarks to include chunked and content-length

[bdraco]

chunked has a different performance profile than content-length (chunked is slower currently). We need benchmarks for both.

I'm still not sure if #9823 is a good change or not so I'm adding more benchmarks to validate it

[codspeed-hq]

CodSpeed Performance Report

Merging #9827 will not alter performance

_{Comparing adjust_read_benchmarks_content_length_chunked (9907357) with master (dc7eee6)}

Summary

✅ 17 untouched benchmarks

🆕 6 new benchmarks
⁉️ 3 (👁 3) dropped benchmarks

Benchmarks breakdown

	Benchmark	master	adjust_read_benchmarks_content_length_chunked	Change
🆕	test_one_hundred_get_requests_with_1mib_chunked_payload[pyloop]	N/A	319.8 ms	N/A
🆕	test_one_hundred_get_requests_with_1mib_content_length_payload[pyloop]	N/A	300.1 ms	N/A
👁	test_one_hundred_get_requests_with_1mib_payload[pyloop]	300.1 ms	N/A	N/A
🆕	test_one_hundred_get_requests_with_2048_chunked_payload[pyloop]	N/A	39 ms	N/A
🆕	test_one_hundred_get_requests_with_2048_content_length_payload[pyloop]	N/A	38.8 ms	N/A
👁	test_one_hundred_get_requests_with_2048_payload[pyloop]	38.7 ms	N/A	N/A
🆕	test_one_hundred_get_requests_with_32768_chunked_payload[pyloop]	N/A	49 ms	N/A
🆕	test_one_hundred_get_requests_with_32768_content_length_payload[pyloop]	N/A	43.1 ms	N/A
👁	test_one_hundred_get_requests_with_32768_payload[pyloop]	42.9 ms	N/A	N/A

[codecov]

Codecov Report

All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅

Project coverage is 98.70%. Comparing base (dc7eee6) to head (9907357).
Report is 2 commits behind head on master.

✅ All tests successful. No failed tests found.

Additional details and impacted files

@@           Coverage Diff           @@
##           master    #9827   +/-   ##
=======================================
  Coverage   98.69%   98.70%           
=======================================
  Files         118      118           
  Lines       36063    36120   +57     
  Branches     4284     4290    +6     
=======================================
+ Hits        35594    35651   +57     
  Misses        315      315           
  Partials      154      154           

Flag	Coverage Δ
CI-GHA	98.59% <100.00%> (+<0.01%)	⬆️
OS-Linux	98.27% <100.00%> (+<0.01%)	⬆️
OS-Windows	96.06% <100.00%> (+<0.01%)	⬆️
OS-macOS	97.36% <100.00%> (+<0.01%)	⬆️
Py-3.10.11	97.20% <100.00%> (+<0.01%)	⬆️
Py-3.10.15	97.75% <100.00%> (-0.05%)	⬇️
Py-3.11.10	97.86% <100.00%> (+<0.01%)	⬆️
Py-3.11.9	97.25% <100.00%> (-0.01%)	⬇️
Py-3.12.7	98.34% <100.00%> (+0.01%)	⬆️
Py-3.13.0	98.28% <100.00%> (-0.05%)	⬇️
Py-3.9.13	97.12% <100.00%> (-0.01%)	⬇️
Py-3.9.20	97.71% <100.00%> (+<0.01%)	⬆️
Py-pypy7.3.16	97.29% <100.00%> (+<0.01%)	⬆️
VM-macos	97.36% <100.00%> (+<0.01%)	⬆️
VM-ubuntu	98.27% <100.00%> (+<0.01%)	⬆️
VM-windows	96.06% <100.00%> (+<0.01%)	⬆️

Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown. Click here to find out more.

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

[bdraco]

Even with tracking syscalls, chunked 1MiB is spending the majority of its time in memcpy

[patchback]

Backport to 3.10: 💚 backport PR created

✅ Backport PR branch: patchback/backports/3.10/14fcfd4c21f63cf9d3bc1ba09e041411a71c8a7a/pr-9827

Backported as #9829

🤖 @patchback
I'm built with octomachinery and
my source is open — https://github.com/sanitizers/patchback-github-app.

[patchback]

Backport to 3.11: 💚 backport PR created

✅ Backport PR branch: patchback/backports/3.11/14fcfd4c21f63cf9d3bc1ba09e041411a71c8a7a/pr-9827

Backported as #9830

🤖 @patchback
I'm built with octomachinery and
my source is open — https://github.com/sanitizers/patchback-github-app.