Skip to content

Conversation

@j0pgrm
Copy link

@j0pgrm j0pgrm commented Aug 17, 2022

Copy link
Collaborator

@ljharb ljharb left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

The linked issue doesn't explain what it's about, and it's been closed. Can you elaborate on what you're trying to achieve?

- `symbol`
- `bigint`

*Goes over numbers*
Copy link
Collaborator

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

this seems redundant

- `array`
- `function`

*Goes over arrays*
Copy link
Collaborator

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

as does this


> Why? This ensures that you can’t reassign your references, which can lead to bugs and difficult to comprehend code.

*Vars and Consts*
Copy link
Collaborator

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

and this

<a name="references--block-scope"></a><a name="2.3"></a>
- [2.3](#references--block-scope) Note that both `let` and `const` are block-scoped, whereas `var` is function-scoped.

*Goes over scopes in Javascript*
Copy link
Collaborator

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

and this

<a name="objects--no-new"></a><a name="3.1"></a>
- [3.1](#objects--no-new) Use the literal syntax for object creation. eslint: [`no-new-object`](https://eslint.org/docs/rules/no-new-object)

*Goes over objects*
Copy link
Collaborator

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

and this

Comment on lines -254 to +257
<Foo style={{ left: "20px" }} />
<Foo className='bad example' />
// good
<Foo style={{ left: '20px' }} />
<Foo className="good example" />
Copy link
Collaborator

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

these MUST remain as "style" with an object literal; there's nothing wrong with the current examples.

@ljharb ljharb marked this pull request as draft August 17, 2022 22:46
@ljharb ljharb mentioned this pull request Aug 26, 2022
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants