-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 1.5k
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
fix(select): select not rendering option wrapped in ng container #1280
Open
aefox
wants to merge
3
commits into
akveo:master
Choose a base branch
from
aefox:fix/select-not-rendering-option-wrapper-in-ng-container
base: master
Could not load branches
Branch not found: {{ refName }}
Loading
Could not load tags
Nothing to show
Loading
Are you sure you want to change the base?
Some commits from the old base branch may be removed from the timeline,
and old review comments may become outdated.
Open
Changes from all commits
Commits
Show all changes
3 commits
Select commit
Hold shift + click to select a range
File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
There are no files selected for viewing
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Original file line number | Diff line number | Diff line change |
---|---|---|
|
@@ -4,4 +4,3 @@ | |
<nb-option value="3">Option 3</nb-option> | ||
<nb-option value="4">Option 4</nb-option> | ||
</nb-select> | ||
|
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Not sure if it's ok to select
ng-container
here. This way it would be possible to pass arbitrary content into select. What do you think @aefox? Probably there is something we could do to restrictng-container
content (e.g. more specific selector)?There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
@yggg I totally see your point on
possible to pass arbitrary content into select
. That indeed is a problem I did not figure out, nice catch 👍At the same time, please note the following
hack/trick
:This is currently possible to do and it works. Works here means it actually renders the
div
s correctly (they ofc do not work as anoption
, but that is expected).I'm not sure if we should force the users of
nebular
to restrict them from usingng-container
in this situation as probably some devs will prefer to useng-container
for loops and keep theirnb-options
cleaner.Indeed doing this we're opening up the possibility for miss usage, but the same can happen for the pure html tags (
select
andoption
).I'm basically opened to doing this any way you think it is best.