The error message is not user-friendly when adding duplicate permissi…

[zhouchunhai]

…ons. (#12773)

What is the purpose of the change

The error message is not user-friendly when adding duplicate permissions.

[github-actions]

Thanks for your this PR. 🙏
Please check again for your PR changes whether contains any usage/api/configuration change such as Add new API , Add new configuration, Change default value of configuration.
If so, please add or update documents(markdown type) in docs/next/ for repository nacos-group/nacos-group.github.io

---

感谢您提交的PR。 🙏
请再次查看您的PR内容，确认是否包含任何使用方式/API/配置参数的变更，如：新增API、新增配置参数、修改默认配置等操作。
如果是，请确保在提交之前，在仓库nacos-group/nacos-group.github.io中的docs/next/目录下添加或更新文档（markdown格式）。

[codecov-commenter]

Codecov Report

Attention: Patch coverage is 36.36364% with 7 lines in your changes missing coverage. Please review.

Project coverage is 72.26%. Comparing base (2a0dafa) to head (b99ca34).
Report is 3 commits behind head on develop.

Files with missing lines	Patch %	Lines
...s/plugin/auth/impl/roles/NacosRoleServiceImpl.java	30.00%	3 Missing and 4 partials ⚠️

Additional details and impacted files

@@              Coverage Diff              @@
##             develop   #12805      +/-   ##
=============================================
+ Coverage      72.25%   72.26%   +0.01%     
- Complexity      9826     9834       +8     
=============================================
  Files           1287     1287              
  Lines          41445    41456      +11     
  Branches        4373     4377       +4     
=============================================
+ Hits           29947    29960      +13     
+ Misses          9396     9391       -5     
- Partials        2102     2105       +3     

Files with missing lines	Coverage Δ
...gin/auth/impl/controller/PermissionController.java	100.00% <100.00%> (ø)
...s/plugin/auth/impl/roles/NacosRoleServiceImpl.java	27.70% <30.00%> (+0.16%)	⬆️

... and 2 files with indirect coverage changes

---

Continue to review full report in Codecov by Sentry.

Legend - Click here to learn more
Δ = absolute <relative> (impact), ø = not affected, ? = missing data
Powered by Codecov. Last update 2a0dafa...b99ca34. Read the comment docs.

[wuyfee]

$\color{green}{SUCCESS}$
DETAILS
✅ - docker: success
✅ - deploy (standalone & cluster & standalone_auth): success
✅ - e2e-java-test (standalone & cluster & standalone_auth): success
✅ - e2e-go-test (standalone & cluster): success
✅ - e2e-cpp-test (standalone & cluster): success
✅ - e2e-csharp-test (standalone & cluster): success
✅ - e2e-nodejs-test (standalone & cluster): success
✅ - e2e-python-test (standalone & cluster): success
✅ - clean (standalone & cluster & standalone_auth): success

[KomachiSion]

Is relatived with #12803?

[zhouchunhai]

It's relatived with #12773

[KomachiSion]

But I think add these two http api can't solve this problem.

the console ui will not call these two api.

[zhouchunhai]

My colleague has already submitted a Pull Request (PR). The console ui will call the new API to check if the permission already exists.

[KomachiSion]

My colleague has already submitted a Pull Request (PR). The console ui will call the new API to check if the permission already exists.

So I ask you whether your pr is relative with #12803 ?

[zhouchunhai]

yes, it's relative with #12803

[wuyfee]

$\color{red}{FAILURE}$
DETAILS
✅ - docker: success
✅ - deploy (standalone & cluster & standalone_auth): success
✅ - e2e-java-test (standalone & cluster & standalone_auth): success
✅ - e2e-go-test (standalone & cluster): success
✅ - e2e-cpp-test (standalone & cluster): success
❌ - e2e-csharp-test (standalone & cluster): failure
✅ - e2e-nodejs-test (standalone & cluster): success
✅ - e2e-python-test (standalone & cluster): success
✅ - clean (standalone & cluster & standalone_auth): success

[wuyfee]

$\color{red}{FAILURE}$
DETAILS
✅ - docker: success
✅ - deploy (standalone & cluster & standalone_auth): success
✅ - e2e-java-test (standalone & cluster & standalone_auth): success
✅ - e2e-go-test (standalone & cluster): success
✅ - e2e-cpp-test (standalone & cluster): success
❌ - e2e-csharp-test (standalone & cluster): failure
✅ - e2e-nodejs-test (standalone & cluster): success
✅ - e2e-python-test (standalone & cluster): success
✅ - clean (standalone & cluster & standalone_auth): success

[wuyfee]

$\color{green}{SUCCESS}$
DETAILS
✅ - docker: success
✅ - deploy (standalone & cluster & standalone_auth): success
✅ - e2e-java-test (standalone & cluster & standalone_auth): success
✅ - e2e-go-test (standalone & cluster): success
✅ - e2e-cpp-test (standalone & cluster): success
✅ - e2e-csharp-test (standalone & cluster): success
✅ - e2e-nodejs-test (standalone & cluster): success
✅ - e2e-python-test (standalone & cluster): success
✅ - clean (standalone & cluster & standalone_auth): success

[KomachiSion]

Hello, you new code ci can't pass, please check the detail log and fix it.

[wuyfee]

$\color{green}{SUCCESS}$
DETAILS
✅ - docker: success
✅ - deploy (standalone & cluster & standalone_auth): success
✅ - e2e-java-test (standalone & cluster & standalone_auth): success
✅ - e2e-go-test (standalone & cluster): success
✅ - e2e-cpp-test (standalone & cluster): success
✅ - e2e-csharp-test (standalone & cluster): success
✅ - e2e-nodejs-test (standalone & cluster): success
✅ - e2e-python-test (standalone & cluster): success
✅ - clean (standalone & cluster & standalone_auth): success

[DirtyBit64]

角色管理模块添加重复的绑定关系（角色-用户）也存在同样的问题

[KomachiSion]

角色管理模块添加重复的绑定关系（角色-用户）也存在同样的问题

Welcome to contribute.

[DirtyBit64]

角色管理模块添加重复的绑定关系（角色-用户）也存在同样的问题

Welcome to contribute.

好的，已提交PR #12926